Multi-instance learning based lung nodule system for assessment of CT quality after small-field-of-view reconstruction.

ABSTRACT

Small-field-of-view reconstruction CT images (sFOV-CT) increase the pixel density across airway structures and reduce partial volume effects. Multi-instance learning (MIL) is proposed as a weakly supervised machine learning method, which can automatically assess the image quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the disparities between conventional CT (c-CT) and sFOV-CT images using a lung nodule system based on MIL and assessments from radiologists. 112 patients who underwent chest CT were retrospectively enrolled in this study between July 2021 to March 2022. After undergoing c-CT examinations, sFOV-CT images with small-field-of-view were reconstructed. Two radiologists analyzed all c-CT and sFOV-CT images, including features such as location, nodule type, size, CT values, and shape signs. Then, an MIL-based lung nodule system objectively analyzed the c-CT (c-MIL) and sFOV-CT (sFOV-MIL) to explore their differences. The signal-to-noise ratio of lungs (SNR-lung) and contrast-to-noise ratio of nodules (CNR-nodule) were calculated to evaluate the quality of CT images from another perspective. The subjective evaluation by radiologists showed that feature of minimal CT value (p = 0.019) had statistical significance between c-CT and sFOV-CT. However, most features (all with p < 0.05), except for nodule type, location, volume, mean CT value, and vacuole sign (p = 0.056-1.000), had statistical differences between c-MIL and sFOV-MIL by MIL system. The SNR-lung between c-CT and sFOV-CT had no statistical significance, while the CNR-nodule showed statistical difference (p = 0.007), and the CNR of sFOV-CT was higher than that of c-CT. In detecting the difference between c-CT and sFOV-CT, features extracted by the MIL system had more statistical differences than those evaluated by radiologists. The image quality of those two CT images was different, and the CNR-nodule of sFOV-CT was higher than that of c-CT.