Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal timing of re-planning for head and neck adaptive radiotherapy.
Gan, Yong; Langendijk, Johannes A; Oldehinkel, Edwin; Lin, Zhixiong; Both, Stefan; Brouwer, Charlotte L.
Afiliación
  • Gan Y; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands; Shantou University, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Department of Radiotherapy, China. Electronic address: kongzhgy@aliyun.com.
  • Langendijk JA; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Oldehinkel E; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Lin Z; Shantou University, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Department of Radiotherapy, China.
  • Both S; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Brouwer CL; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Radiother Oncol ; 194: 110145, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38341093
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) relies on re-planning to correct treatment variations, but the optimal timing of re-planning to account for dose changes in head and neck organs at risk (OARs) is still under investigation. We aimed to find out the optimal timing of re-planning in head and neck ART. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A total of 110 head and neck cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled. A semi auto-segmentation method was applied to obtain the weekly mean dose (Dmean) to OARs. The K-nearest-neighbour method was used for missing data imputation of weekly Dmean. A dose deviation map was built using the planning Dmean and weekly Dmean values and then used to simulate different ART scenarios consisting of 1 to 6 re-plannings. The difference between accumulated Dmean and planning Dmean before re-planning (ΔDmean_acc_noART) and after re-planning (ΔDmean_acc_ART) were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS:

Among all the OARs, supraglottic showed the largest ΔDmean_acc_noART (1.23 ± 3.13 Gy) and most cases of ΔDmean_acc_noART > 3 Gy (26 patients). The 3rd week is suggested in the optimal timing of re-planning for 10 OARs. For all the organs except arytenoid, 2 re-plannings were able to guarantee the ΔDmean_acc_ART below 3 Gy while the average |ΔDmean_acc_ART| was below 1 Gy. ART scenarios of 2_4, 3_4, 3_5 (week of re-planning separated with "_") were able to guarantee ΔDmean_acc_ART of 99 % of patients below 3 Gy simultaneously for 19 OARs.

CONCLUSIONS:

The optimal timing of re-planning was suggested for different organs at risk in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy. Generic scenarios of timing and frequency for re-planning can be applied to guarantee the increase of accumulated mean dose within 3 Gy simultaneously for multiple organs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosificación Radioterapéutica / Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Órganos en Riesgo / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosificación Radioterapéutica / Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Órganos en Riesgo / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article