Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Colorectal cancer genetic referral: Are we doing enough?
Broyles, Whitnee C; Narvekar, Priyanka; Lee, Hanjoo; Fleshman, James W; Fichera, Alessandro; Wells, Katerina K O.
Afiliación
  • Broyles WC; Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Narvekar P; Texas A&M School of Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Lee H; Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Fleshman JW; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Fichera A; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Wells KKO; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 37(2): 250-254, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343462
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Guidelines are published for referral to genetic counseling and multigene panel genetic testing for colorectal cancer. We hypothesize that these guidelines are not recognized in practice, resulting in the underreferral of patients to genetic counseling. We aimed to investigate the clinical impact of these guidelines.

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using a single academic-institution colorectal cancer patient registry. The registry included all patients ≥18 years old with a pathologic diagnosis of colon cancer, rectal cancer, or polyposis from January 2018 to January 2020 with complete chart data to determine inclusion into the genetic referral cohort.

Results:

Out of 225 colon cancer patients, 92 met criteria for referral to genetic testing, but only 56 patients obtained referral and 39 completed testing. For rectal cancer, 29 out of 127 patients met criteria for referral, but only 11 obtained referral and 8 completed testing. Actionable variants, defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, were identified in 18 colon cancer and 5 rectal cancer patients. Age made a significant difference in the referral rate for colon cancer (P = 0.02) but not rectal cancer (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrates poor adherence to guideline-based genetic testing. These data emphasize the need for more consistent referral to genetic testing for diagnosis of underlying inherited cancer syndromes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos