Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A study on the improvement in the ability of endoscopists to diagnose gastric neoplasms using an artificial intelligence system.
Zhang, Bojiang; Zhang, Wei; Yao, Hongjuan; Qiao, Jinggui; Zhang, Haimiao; Song, Ying.
Afiliación
  • Zhang B; Department of Gastroenterology, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an, China.
  • Zhang W; Clinical Medical College, Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, China.
  • Yao H; Department of Gastroenterology, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an, China.
  • Qiao J; Department of Gastroenterology, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an, China.
  • Zhang H; College of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, China.
  • Song Y; Department of Gastroenterology, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1323516, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38348337
ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence-assisted gastroscopy (AIAG) based on deep learning has been validated in various scenarios, but there is a lack of studies regarding diagnosing neoplasms under white light endoscopy. This study explored the potential role of AIAG systems in enhancing the ability of endoscopists to diagnose gastric tumor lesions under white light.

Methods:

A total of 251 patients with complete pathological information regarding electronic gastroscopy, biopsy, or ESD surgery in Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital were retrospectively collected and comprised 64 patients with neoplasm lesions (excluding advanced cancer) and 187 patients with non-neoplasm lesions. The diagnosis competence of endoscopists with intermediate experience and experts was compared for gastric neoplasms with or without the assistance of AIAG, which was developed based on ResNet-50.

Results:

For the 251 patients with difficult clinical diagnoses included in the study, compared with endoscopists with intermediate experience, AIAG's diagnostic competence was much higher, with a sensitivity of 79.69% (79.69% vs. 72.50%, p = 0.012) and a specificity of 73.26% (73.26% vs. 52.62%, p < 0.001). With the help of AIAG, the endoscopists with intermediate experience (<8 years) demonstrated a relatively higher specificity (59.79% vs. 52.62%, p < 0.001). Experts (≥8 years) had similar results with or without AI assistance (with AI vs. without AI; sensitivities, 70.31% vs. 67.81%, p = 0.358; specificities, 83.85% vs. 85.88%, p = 0.116).

Conclusion:

With the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, the ability of endoscopists with intermediate experience to diagnose gastric neoplasms is significantly improved, but AI systems have little effect on experts.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China