Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A qualitative co-design-based approach to identify sources of workplace-related distress and develop well-being strategies for cardiovascular nurses, allied health professionals, and physicians.
Jelen, Ahlexxi; Goldfarb, Rebecca; Rosart, Jennifer; Graham, Leanna; Rubin, Barry B.
Afiliación
  • Jelen A; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 585 University Avenue LPMB 119 K, M5G 2N2, Toronto, ON, Canada. ahlexxi.jelen@uhn.ca.
  • Goldfarb R; Goldfarb Intelligence Marketing, Toronto, Canada.
  • Rosart J; Healthcare Human Factors, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Graham L; Office of Professional Practice & Policy, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Rubin BB; Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 246, 2024 Feb 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408946
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Clinician distress is a multidimensional condition that includes burnout, decreased meaning in work, severe fatigue, poor work-life integration, reduced quality of life, and suicidal ideation. It has negative impacts on patients, providers, and healthcare systems. In this three-phase qualitative investigation, we identified workplace-related factors that drive clinician distress and co-designed actionable interventions with inter-professional cardiovascular clinicians to decrease their distress and improve well-being within a Canadian quaternary hospital network.

METHODS:

Between October 2021 and May 2022, we invited nurses, allied health professionals, and physicians to participate in a three-phase qualitative investigation. Phases 1 and 2 included individual interviews and focus groups to identify workplace-related factors contributing to distress. Phase 3 involved co-design workshops that engaged inter-professional clinicians to develop interventions addressing drivers of distress identified. Qualitative information was analyzed using descriptive thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

Fifty-one clinicians (24 nurses, 10 allied health professionals, and 17 physicians) participated. Insights from Phases 1 and 2 identified five key thematic drivers of distress inadequate support within inter-professional teams, decreased joy in work, unsustainable workloads, limited opportunities for learning and professional growth, and a lack of transparent leadership communication. Phase 3 co-design workshops yielded four actionable interventions to mitigate clinician distress in the workplace re-designing daily safety huddles, formalizing a nursing coaching and mentorship program, creating a value-added program e-newsletter, and implementing an employee experience platform.

CONCLUSION:

This study increases our understanding on workplace-related factors that contribute to clinician distress, as shared by inter-professional clinicians specializing in cardiovascular care. Healthcare organizations can develop effective interventions to mitigate clinician distress by actively engaging healthcare workers in identifying workplace drivers of distress and collaboratively designing tailored, practical interventions that directly address these challenges.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Agotamiento Profesional Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Agotamiento Profesional Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá