Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of patient-reported outcome measures after breast reconstruction in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
Malapati, Sri Harshini; Hyland, Colby J; Liang, George; Edelen, Maria O; Fazzalari, Amanda; Kaur, Manraj N; Bain, Paul A; Mody, Gita N; Pusic, Andrea L.
Afiliación
  • Malapati SH; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. smalapati@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Hyland CJ; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Liang G; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Edelen MO; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Fazzalari A; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Kaur MN; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Bain PA; Countway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Mody GN; Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Pusic AL; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
J Patient Rep Outcomes ; 8(1): 25, 2024 Feb 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416222
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly administered in high-income countries to monitor health-related quality of life of breast cancer patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Although low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face a disproportionate burden of breast cancer, little is known about the use of PROMs in LMICs. This scoping review aims to examine the use of PROMs after post-mastectomy breast reconstruction among patients with breast cancer in LMICs.

METHODS:

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched in August 2022 for English-language studies using PROMs after breast reconstruction among patients with breast cancer in LMICs. Study screening and data extraction were completed. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS:

The search produced 1024 unique studies, 33 of which met inclusion criteria. Most were observational (48.5%) or retrospective (33.3%) studies. Studies were conducted in only 10 LMICs, with 60.5% in China and Brazil and none in low-income countries. Most were conducted in urban settings (84.8%) and outpatient clinics (57.6%), with 63.6% incorporating breast-specific PROMs and 33.3% including breast reconstruction-specific PROMs. Less than half (45.5%) used PROMs explicitly validated for their populations of interest. Only 21.2% reported PROM response rates, ranging from 43.1 to 96.9%. Barriers and facilitators of PROM use were infrequently noted.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite the importance of PROM collection and use in providing patient-centered care, it continues to be limited in middle-income countries and is not evident in low-income countries after breast reconstruction. Further research is necessary to determine effective methods to address the challenges of PROM use in LMICs.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamoplastia Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Rep Outcomes Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamoplastia Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Rep Outcomes Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos