Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive gastrectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis in China.
Cui, Hao; Liang, Wenquan; Cui, Jianxin; Song, Liqiang; Yuan, Zhen; Chen, Lin; Wei, Bo.
Afiliación
  • Cui H; School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, P. R. China.
  • Liang W; Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
  • Cui J; Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
  • Song L; Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
  • Yuan Z; School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, P. R. China.
  • Chen L; Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China.
  • Wei B; School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, P. R. China.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) ; 12: goae005, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38425656
ABSTRACT

Background:

The effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes between MIG after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (NICT-MIG) and MIG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (NCT-MIG), and determine risk factors for post-operative complications (POCs).

Methods:

This retrospective study included clinicopathologic data from 193 patients who underwent NCT-MIG or NICT-MIG between January 2020 and February 2023 in the Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital First Medical Center (Beijing, China). Propensity score-matched analysis at a ratio of 12 was performed to reduce bias from confounding patient-related variables and short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results:

The baseline characteristics were comparable between 49 patients in the NICT-MIG group and 86 patients in the NCT-MIG group after propensity score matching. Objective and pathologic complete response rates were significantly higher in the NICT-MIG group than in the NCT-MIG group (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of treat-related adverse events, intraoperative bleeding, operation time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, time to the first flatus, post-operative duration of hospitalization, overall morbidity, and severe morbidity were comparable between the NCT-MIG and NICT-MIG groups (P > 0.05). By multivariate logistic analysis, estimated blood loss of >200 mL (P = 0.010) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) score of <45 (P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for POCs after MIG following neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusions:

Safety and feasibility of NICT were comparable to those of NCT in patients undergoing MIG for LAGC. Patients with an estimated blood loss of >200 mL or a PNI score of <45 should be carefully evaluated for increased POCs risk.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article