Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
European association of urology risk stratification predicts outcome in patients receiving PSMA-PET-planned salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Scharl, Sophia; Zamboglou, Constantinos; Strouthos, Iosif; Farolfi, Andrea; Serani, Francesca; Koerber, Stefan A; Debus, Jürgen; Peeken, Jan C; Vogel, Marco M E; Kroeze, Stephanie G C; Guckenberger, Matthias; Krafcsik, Manuel; Hruby, George; Emmett, Louise; Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie; Trapp, Christian; Spohn, Simon K B; Henkenberens, Christoph; Mayer, Benjamin; Shelan, Mohamed; Aebersold, Daniel M; Thamm, Reinhard; Wiegel, Thomas.
Afiliación
  • Scharl S; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: Sophia.scharl@uniklinik-ulm.de.
  • Zamboglou C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
  • Strouthos I; Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.
  • Farolfi A; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Serani F; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Koerber SA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Debus J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Peeken JC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany.
  • Vogel MME; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany.
  • Kroeze SGC; Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Canton Hospital of Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
  • Guckenberger M; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Krafcsik M; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
  • Hruby G; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Emmett L; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Schmidt-Hegemann NS; Department of Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.
  • Trapp C; Department of Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
  • Spohn SKB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
  • Henkenberens C; Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Mayer B; Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Shelan M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Aebersold DM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Thamm R; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
  • Wiegel T; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
Radiother Oncol ; 194: 110215, 2024 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458259
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The European Association of Urology (EAU) proposed a risk stratification (high vs. low risk) for patients with biochemical recurrence (BR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Here we investigated whether this stratification accurately predicts outcome, particularly in patients staged with PSMA-PET.

METHODS:

For this study, we used a retrospective database including 1222 PSMA-PET-staged prostate cancer patients who were treated with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for BR, at 11 centers in 5 countries. Patients with lymph node metastases (pN1 or cN1) or unclear EAU risk group were excluded. The remaining cohort comprised 526 patients, including 132 low-risk and 394 high-risk patients.

RESULTS:

The median follow-up time after SRT was 31.0 months. The 3-year biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was 85.7 % in EAU low-risk versus 69.4 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.002). The 3-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 94.4 % in low-risk versus 87.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.005). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 99.0 % in low-risk versus 99.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.925). In multivariate analysis, EAU risk group remained a statistically significant predictor of BPFS (p = 0.003, HR 2.022, 95 % CI 1.262-3.239) and MFS (p = 0.013, HR 2.986, 95 % CI 1.262-7.058).

CONCLUSION:

Our data support the EAU risk group definition. EAU risk grouping for BCR reliably predicted outcome in patients staged lymph node-negative after RP and with PSMA-PET before SRT. To our knowledge, this is the first study validating the EAU risk grouping in patients treated with PSMA-PET-planned SRT.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostatectomía / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Terapia Recuperativa / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostatectomía / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Terapia Recuperativa / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article