Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is routine lymph node dissection recommended for liver resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ishii, Takamichi; Iwaki, Kentaro; Nakakura, Akiyoshi; Yoh, Tomoaki; Uchida, Yoichiro; Hatano, Etsuro.
Afiliación
  • Ishii T; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan; Department of Surgery for Abdominal Oncology and Organ Regeneration, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan. Electronic address: taishii@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
  • Iwaki K; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
  • Nakakura A; Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
  • Yoh T; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
  • Uchida Y; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
  • Hatano E; Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
HPB (Oxford) ; 26(6): 731-740, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580611
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

PURPOSE:

This meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the therapeutic effects of routine lymph node dissection (LND) with liver resection on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS:

Databases, including MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to identify studies comparing LND and non-LND for ICC liver resection. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), in-hospital morbidity, blood loss, and R0 rate.

RESULTS:

Seventeen studies involving 4407 patients were included. The OS did not differ between the LND (n = 2158) and non-LND (n = 2249) groups (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.32). The secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Subgroup analyses stratified by the risk of bias showed a significant difference in OS between the high- and low-risk groups (P = 0.0008). In the low-risk group, LND (vs. non-LND) was associated with superior OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98). Most studies in low-risk groups involved patients who were clinically node-negative.

CONCLUSIONS:

The therapeutic effects of routine LND for ICC have not been demonstrated. However, LND had a positive impact on OS in studies with a low risk of bias, thus suggesting that there may be a subset of ICC patients who would benefit from LND.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares / Colangiocarcinoma / Hepatectomía / Escisión del Ganglio Linfático Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: HPB (Oxford) Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares / Colangiocarcinoma / Hepatectomía / Escisión del Ganglio Linfático Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: HPB (Oxford) Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article