Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
National Beef Quality Audit-2022: Transportation, mobility, live cattle, and hide assessments to determine producer-related defects that affect animal welfare and the value of market cows and bulls at processing facilities.
Borders, Sydni E; Schwartz, Trent E; Mayer, Thachary R; Gehring, Kerri B; Griffin, Davey B; Kerth, Christopher R; Belk, Keith E; Edwards-Callaway, Lily; Scanga, John A; Nair, Mahesh N; Morgan, J Brad; Douglas, Jarrett B; Pfeiffer, Morgan M; Mafi, Gretchen G; Harr, Keayla M; Lawrence, Ty E; Tennant, Travis C; Lucherk, Loni W; O'Quinn, Travis G; Beyer, Erin S; Bass, Phil D; Garcia, Lyda G; Bohrer, Benjamin M; Pempek, Jessica A; Garmyn, Andrea J; Maddock, Robert J; Carr, C Chad; Pringle, T Dean; Scheffler, Tracy L; Scheffler, Jason M; Stelzleni, Alexander M; Gonzalez, John M; Underwood, Keith R; Harsh, Bailey N; Waters, Crystal M; Savell, Jeffrey W.
Afiliación
  • Borders SE; Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA.
  • Schwartz TE; Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA.
  • Mayer TR; Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA.
  • Gehring KB; Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA.
  • Griffin DB; Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA.
  • Kerth CR; Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA.
  • Belk KE; Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA.
  • Edwards-Callaway L; Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA.
  • Scanga JA; Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA.
  • Nair MN; Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA.
  • Morgan JB; Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA.
  • Douglas JB; Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1171, USA.
  • Pfeiffer MM; Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
  • Mafi GG; Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
  • Harr KM; Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
  • Lawrence TE; Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, 79016, USA.
  • Tennant TC; Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, 79016, USA.
  • Lucherk LW; Department of Agricultural Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, 79016, USA.
  • O'Quinn TG; Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
  • Beyer ES; Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
  • Bass PD; Department of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844-2330, USA.
  • Garcia LG; Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
  • Bohrer BM; Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
  • Pempek JA; Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
  • Garmyn AJ; Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
  • Maddock RJ; Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA.
  • Carr CC; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA.
  • Pringle TD; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA.
  • Scheffler TL; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA.
  • Scheffler JM; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0910, USA.
  • Stelzleni AM; Animal & Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-6755, USA.
  • Gonzalez JM; Animal & Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-6755, USA.
  • Underwood KR; Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
  • Harsh BN; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
  • Waters CM; College of Agriculture, California State University, Chico, CA, 95929, USA.
  • Savell JW; Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2471, USA.
Transl Anim Sci ; 8: txae033, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616995
ABSTRACT
The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA)-2022 serves as a benchmark of the current market cow and bull sectors of the U.S. beef industry and allows comparison to previous audits as a method of monitoring industry progress. From September 2021 through May 2022, livestock trailers (n = 125), live animals (n = 5,430), and post-slaughter hide-on animals (n = 6,674) were surveyed at 20 commercial beef processing facilities across the U.S. Cattle were transported in a variety of trailer types for an average distance of 490.6 km and a mean transport time of 6.3 h. During transit, cattle averaged 2.3 m2 of trailer space per animal indicating sufficient space was provided according to industry guidelines. Of all trailers surveyed, 55.3% transported cattle from an auction barn to a processing facility. When surveyed, 63.6% of all truck drivers reported to be Beef Quality Assurance certified. The majority (77.0%) of cattle were sound when evaluated for mobility. Mean body condition scores (9-point scale) for beef cows and bulls were 3.8 and 4.4, respectively, whereas mean body condition scores (5-point scale) for dairy cows and bulls were 2.3 and 2.6, respectively. Of the cattle surveyed, 45.1% had no visible live animal defects, and 37.9% had only a single defect. Of defects present in cows, 64.6% were attributed to an udder problem. Full udders were observed in 47.5% of all cows. Nearly all cattle were free of visible abscesses and knots (97.9% and 98.2%, respectively). No horns were observed in 89.4% of all cattle surveyed. Beef cattle were predominantly black-hided (68.9% and 67.4% of cows and bulls, respectively). Holstein was the predominant dairy animal observed and accounted for 85.7% of the cows and 98.0% of the bulls. Only 3.1% of all animals had no form of identification. Findings from the NBQA-2022 show improvements within the industry and identify areas that require continued education and research to improve market cow and bull welfare and beef quality.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Transl Anim Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Transl Anim Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos