Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery.
Lee, Hayoung; Lee, Jong Lyul; Lee, Ji Sung; Kim, Chan Wook; Yoon, Yong Sik; Park, In Ja; Lim, Seok-Byung.
Afiliación
  • Lee H; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee JL; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee JS; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim CW; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yoon YS; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park IJ; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lim SB; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
World J Surg ; 48(6): 1534-1544, 2024 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666738
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prophylactic antibiotics (PAs) are standard for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) post-colorectal surgery. This study aims to compare the effect of additional empiric oral antibiotics (OAs) alongside routine PAs to identify SSI risk factors.

METHODS:

A retrospective observatory analysis was conducted from January 2019 to December 2022 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. The cohort was divided into two groups PA given 1 h before surgery and discontinued within 24 h, and OA administered empiric OAs during mechanical bowel preparation in addition to PA.

RESULTS:

From a total of 6736 patients, 3482 were in the PA group and 3254 in the OA group. SSI incidence showed no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.374) even after propensity score matching (p = 0.338). The multivariable analysis revealed male sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.153, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.626-2.852, and p = 0.001], open surgery (OR 3.335, 95% CI 2.456-4.528, and p = 0.001), dirty wound (OR 2.171, 95% CI 1.256-3.754, and p = 0.006), and an operation time of more than 145 min (OR 2.110, 95% CI 1.324-3.365, and p = 0.002) as SSI risk factors. In rectal surgery subgroup, OA demonstrated a protective effect against SSI (OR 0.613, 95% CI 0.408-0.922, and p = 0.019) and in laparoscopic approach (OR 0.626, 95% CI 0.412-0.952, and p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS:

OA did not affect SSI incidence in colorectal surgeries. Male sex, open surgery, dirty wounds, and longer operation time were risk factors for SSI. However, for rectal and laparoscopic surgery, OA was a protective factor for SSI.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica / Profilaxis Antibiótica / Antibacterianos Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica / Profilaxis Antibiótica / Antibacterianos Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article