Cardioneuroablation for Cardioinhibitory Vasovagal Syncope: Rationale, Approaches, and Its Role in Long-Term Management.

ABSTRACT

Purpose of Review Cardioneuroablation (CNA) has emerged as a potential alternative to pacemaker therapy in well-selected cases with vasovagal syncope (VVS). In recent years, the number of CNA procedures performed by electrophysiologists has considerably risen. However, some important questions, including proper patient selection and long-term results, remain unanswered. The present article aims to critically review and interpret latest scientific evidence for clinical indications and how to approach long-term management. Recent Findings: CNA is a new approach that has been supported mainly by retrospective or observational data for its use in syncope. Overall, in mixed population studies treated with CNA, 83.3 to 100% have been reported to be free of syncope over follow-up periods of 6 to 52.1 months. For studies including patients who underwent CNA with pure VVS, 73.2 to 100% have been reported to be syncope-free over follow-up periods of 4 to 45.1 months. One large meta-analysis showed 91.9% freedom from syncope after CAN. To date, only one randomized controlled trial with small case number has been performed of CNA compared to non-pharmacological treatment in VVS. In this study of 48 patients with an average of 10 ± 9 spontaneous syncopal episodes prior to study enrollment and 3 ± 2 episodes in the year prior to CNA. After CNA, 92% were free of syncope compared with 46% treated with optimal non-pharmacological treatment to prevent new syncope episodes (P = 0.0004). To date, most studies have included younger patients (< 60 years of age). There are only limited data in patients older than 60, and some studies suggest less of an effect in relatively older patients. Summary: Cardioneuroablation can be performed to decrease syncope recurrence in adult patients aged < 60 years, with severe or recurrent cardioinhibitory syncope without prodromal symptoms, after proven failure of conventional therapies. Due to a paucity of data supporting efficacy in older individuals or for vasodepressor components, CNA in adult patients aged > 60 years or in the presence of a dominant vasodepressor should be considered investigational in severely symptomatic patients after proven failure of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies.