Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of mask mandates on subways to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United States.
Park, Joohyun; Joo, Heesoo; Kim, Daniel; Mase, Sundari; Christensen, Deborah; Maskery, Brian A.
Afiliación
  • Park J; Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Joo H; Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Kim D; Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Mase S; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
  • Christensen D; Georgia Institute of Technology, H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Maskery BA; Division of Global Migration Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302199, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748706
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Community-based mask wearing has been shown to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. However, few studies have conducted an economic evaluation of mask mandates, specifically in public transportation settings. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of implementing mask mandates for subway passengers in the United States by evaluating its potential to reduce COVID-19 transmission during subway travel. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We assessed the health impacts and costs of subway mask mandates compared to mask recommendations based on the number of infections that would occur during subway travel in the U.S. Using a combined box and Wells-Riley infection model, we estimated monthly infections, hospitalizations, and deaths averted under a mask mandate scenario as compared to a mask recommendation scenario. The analysis included costs of implementing mask mandates and COVID-19 treatment from a limited societal perspective. The cost-effectiveness (net cost per averted death) of mandates was estimated for three different periods based on dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants Alpha, Beta, and Gamma (November 2020 to February 2021); Delta (July to October 2021); and early Omicron (January to March 2022).

RESULTS:

Compared with mask recommendations only, mask mandates were cost-effective across all periods, with costs per averted death less than a threshold of $11.4 million (ranging from cost-saving to $3 million per averted death). Additionally, mask mandates were more cost-effective during the early Omicron period than the other two periods and were cost saving in January 2022. Our findings showed that mandates remained cost-effective when accounting for uncertainties in input parameters (e.g., even if mandates only resulted in small increases in mask usage by subway ridership).

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings highlight the economic value of mask mandates on subways, particularly during high virus transmissibility periods, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study may inform stakeholders on mask mandate decisions during future outbreaks of novel viral respiratory diseases.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Análisis Costo-Beneficio / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Máscaras Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Análisis Costo-Beneficio / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Máscaras Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos