Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AI model to detect contact relationship between maxillary sinus and posterior teeth.
Ding, Wanghui; Jiang, Yindi; Pang, Gaozhi; Liu, Ziang; Wu, Yuefan; Li, Jianhua; Wu, Fuli.
Afiliación
  • Ding W; Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Jiang Y; Hangzhou Linping Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, China.
  • Pang G; College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, China.
  • Liu Z; Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Wu Y; Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Li J; Hangzhou Dental Hospital, China.
  • Wu F; College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, China.
Heliyon ; 10(10): e31052, 2024 May 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38799758
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To establish a novel deep learning networks (MSF-MPTnet) based on panoramic radiographs (PRs) for automatic assessment of relationship between maxillary sinus floor (MSF) and maxillary posterior teeth (MPT), and to compare accuracy of MSF-MPTnet, dentists and radiologists identifying contact relationship. Study

design:

A total of 1035 PRs and 1035 Cone-beam computed tomographys (CBCT)images were collected from January 2018 to April 2022. The relationships were classified into class I and II by CBCT. Class I represents non-contact group, and class II represents contact group. 350 PRs were randomly selected as test dataset and accuracy of MSF-MPTnet, dentists, and radiologists was compared.

Results:

The intraclass correlation coefficient of dentists was 0.460-0.690 and it was 0.453-0.664 for radiologists. Sensitivity and accuracy of MSF-MPTnet were 0.682-0.852and 0.890-0.951, indicating that the output performance of MSF-MPTnet was reliable. Accuracy of maxillary premolars and molars were 79.7%-90.3 %, 76.2%-89.2 % and 72.9%-88.3 % in MSF-MPTnet model, dentists and radiologists. Accuracy of class I relationship in the MSF-MPTnet model (67.7%-94.6 %) was higher than that of dentists (56.5%-84.6 %) in maxillary first premolars and right second premolar, and accuracy of class I relationship in the MSF-MPTnet model is also higher than radiologists (40.0%-78.1 %) in all teeth positions (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

MSF-MPTnet model could increase detecting accuracy of the relationship between MSF and MPT, minimize pseudo contact relationship and reduce frequency of CBCT use.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China