Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Process evaluation of the implementation of the ABC method, an intervention for nurses dealing with challenging behaviour of patients with brain injury.
Pouwels, Climmy; Spauwen, Peggy; Verbeek, Hilde; Winkens, Ieke; Ponds, Rudolf.
Afiliación
  • Pouwels C; Multidisciplinary Specialist Centre for Brain Injury and Neuropsychiatry, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, The Netherlands. climmy.pouwels@dezorggroep.nl.
  • Spauwen P; De Zorggroep Noord- en Midden-Limburg, P.O. Box 694, Venlo, 5900 AR, The Netherlands. climmy.pouwels@dezorggroep.nl.
  • Verbeek H; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. climmy.pouwels@dezorggroep.nl.
  • Winkens I; Multidisciplinary Specialist Centre for Brain Injury and Neuropsychiatry, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, The Netherlands.
  • Ponds R; Clinical Centre of Excellence for Personality Disorders in Older Adults, Mondriaan Mental Health Center, Heerlen-Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Nurs ; 23(1): 354, 2024 May 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802845
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Introducing new working methods is common in healthcare organisations. However, implementation of a new method is often suboptimal. This reduces the effectiveness of the innovation and has several other negative effects, for example on staff turnover. The aim of the current study was to implement the ABC method in residential departments for brain injured patients and to assess the quality of the implementation process. The ABC method is a simplified form of behavioural modification based on the concept that behaviour operates on the environment and is maintained by its consequences.

METHODS:

Four residential departments for brain injured patients introduced the ABC method sequentially as healthcare innovation using a stepped-wedge design. A systematic process evaluation of the implementation was carried out using the framework of Saunders et al. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data; open questions were clustered.

RESULTS:

The training of the ABC method was well executed and the nursing staff was enthusiastic and sufficiently involved. Important aspects for successful implementation had been addressed (like a detailed implementation plan and implementation meetings). However, facilitators and barriers that were noted were not addressed in a timely manner. This negatively influenced the extent to which the ABC method could be properly learned, implemented, and applied in the short and long term.

CONCLUSIONS:

The most challenging part of the introduction of this new trained and introduced method in health care was clearly the implementation. To have a successful implementation serious attention is needed to tailor-made evidence-based implementation strategies based on facilitators and barriers that are identified during the implementation process. Bottlenecks in working with the ABC method have to be addressed as soon as possible. This likely requires 'champions' who are trained for the job, next to an organisation's management that facilitates the multidisciplinary teams and provides clarity about policy and agreements regarding the training and implementation of the new method. The current process evaluation and the recommendations may serve as an example for the implementation of new methods in other healthcare organisations.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BMC Nurs Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BMC Nurs Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos