Implementation of Guideline-Based HBV Reactivation Management in Patients with Chronic HBV Infections of HBsAg or Resolved HBV Infection Undergoing Immunosuppressive Therapy.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although patients with HBV have a risk of reactivation after immunosuppressive therapy (IST), the status of their risk management is unclear in Japan. This study aims to describe the proportion of patients who received preventive management of HBV reactivation during ISTs in patients with chronic HBV infection of HBsAg or resolved HBV infection. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the JMDC Japanese claims database from April 2011 to June 2021. Patients with HBV infections of HbsAg who received ISTs or patients who had resolved HBV infections who received ISTs were identified from the database and evaluated for appropriate management to prevent HBV reactivation. RESULTS: In total, 6242 eligible patients were identified. The proportions of patients with appropriate HBV reactivation management, stratified by the HBV reactivation risk level of IST, was 43.1% (276/641) for high-risk, 40.2% (223/555) for intermediate-risk and 14.9% (741/4965) for low-risk patients. When the evaluation period for the outcome calculation was shortened from 360 to 180 days, the proportion for high risk increased to 52.7%. The odds ratios of large hospitals for receiving appropriate management were 2.16 (95% CI 1.12-4.44) in the high-risk, 4.63 (95% CI 2.34-10.25) in the intermediate-risk and 3.60 (95% CI 3.07-4.24) in the low-risk patients. CONCLUSION: HBV reactivation management was tailored according to the reactivation risk associated with IST. However, adherence to HBV reactivation management guidelines was sub-optimal, even among high-risk patients. This is especially the case for ensuring smaller-sized medical institutions, highlighting the need for further educational activities.

The study assesses the implementation of guideline-based management of hepatitis B virus reactivation during immunosuppressive therapy in Japan. The appropriate management of hepatitis B virus treatment involves prophylactic nucleos(t)ide analog (NUC) therapy and regular monitoring of hepatitis B virus DNA. This study aims to assess the extent to which these management practices are implemented in a clinical setting in Japan using a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Medical Claims Database. The analysis identified 6242 eligible patients and identified whether they received appropriate management to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation based on the level of risk associated with their immunosuppressive therapy. Based on the guidelines, the proportions of patients receiving appropriate reactivation management were 43.1% for high-risk, 40.2% for intermediate-risk and 14.9% for low-risk immunosuppressive therapy patients. Shortening the evaluation period from 360 to 180 days showed an increase in the proportion of high-risk patients to 52.7%, which indicated the potential challenge for continued monitoring after immunosuppressive therapy administration. The study shows that large hospitals present higher odds of patients receiving appropriate management. Overall, adherence to hepatitis B virus reactivation management guidelines was suboptimal, especially in smaller medical institutions, emphasizing the need for additional educational activities.