Differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by ultrasonography combined with multiphase enhanced computed tomography.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are primary liver cancers with different therapeutic methods and prognoses. This study aims to investigate the ultrasonography and enhanced computed tomography (CT) features of these cancers and improve the early diagnosis rate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of 319 patients diagnosed with HCC and 124 patients diagnosed with ICC, confirmed by pathology. Results: A total of 443 patients were eligible in this study. From the perspective of clinical data, between HCC and ICC patients existed significant differences in age, gender, hepatic background, serum tumor markers of AFP and CA19.9, chronic hepatitis B/C and lymph node infiltration (p<0.05), but not in tumor size, microvascular invasion, serum tumor markers of CEA and CA125 (P>0.05). With respect to ultrasonography features, HCC patients had a higher proportion than ICC patients in splenomegaly (p=0.001), while ICC patients had a higher proportion than HCC patients in absence/not rich vascularity and intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (p<0.05). With respect to CT features, HCC patients were significantly different from ICC patients in the three-phase enhanced CT value mean, enhanced intensity and homogeneity of nodules (P<0.05). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to further clarify the correlation of these indices. However, only age≤60 years (OR=1.861, P=0.045), male (OR=3.850, P<0.001), AFP>7ng/ml (OR=0.119, P<0.001), lymph node infiltration (OR=5.968, P<0.001), intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (OR=2.414, P=0.04), splenomegaly (OR=0.081, P<0.001), rim APHE (OR=3.109, P=0.002), and iso- or hyper enhancement (OR=0.188, P<0.001) were independent risk factors. Conclusions: While there are overlapping ultrasonography and CT features between HCC and ICC, the integration of tumor markers and specific imaging characteristics can be beneficial in distinguishing between the two.