Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral Prostacyclin Pathway Agents Used in PAH: A Targeted Literature Review.
Burger, Charles D; Tsang, Yuen; Chivers, Marie; Vekaria, Riya Vijay; Doad, Gurinderpal; Atkins, Nikki; Panjabi, Sumeet.
Afiliación
  • Burger CD; Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
  • Tsang Y; Janssen Scientific Affiars, Titusville, NJ, USA.
  • Chivers M; Avalere Health, Fleet, UK.
  • Vekaria RV; Avalere Health, Fleet, UK.
  • Doad G; Janssen Scientific Affiars, Titusville, NJ, USA.
  • Atkins N; Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc, A Johnson and Johnson Co., Titusville, NJ, USA.
  • Panjabi S; Avalere Health, Fleet, UK.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 16: 447-459, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831921
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive pulmonary vascular disease that can result in right heart failure and death. Oral prostacyclins play an important role in the management of intermediate-low risk PAH. This targeted literature review (TLR) aimed to identify and compare evidence supporting use of oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs selexipag and oral treprostinil) in intermediate-low risk PAH.

Methods:

A targeted literature review was conducted. Literature databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane reviews) were searched for studies describing clinical practice and treatment outcomes for oral treprostinil and selexipag globally, published in English (2012 to 2022). Electronic searches were supplemented by manual-searches of targeted conferences (2020 to 2022), and reference lists of identified publications were reviewed. One reviewer assessed studies for eligibility.

Results:

In total, 95 publications met inclusion criteria 47 full-text articles (selexipag n = 22; oral treprostinil n = 16; selexipag and oral treprostinil n = 9) and 48 conference materials. Selexipag and oral treprostinil target the prostacyclin pathway differently; their label-supporting trials had different primary endpoints (disease progression and hospitalization vs exercise capacity and disease progression), differing baseline therapy (0, 1 or 2 vs 0 or 1 baseline treatments), titration duration and dosing (personalized dose capped at 1600 ug twice daily (BID) vs increasing doses over time with no maximum dose), respectively. While both oral PPAs have demonstrated reduced risk of disease progression, only selexipag showed reduction in hospitalization rates. Oral PPAs have been shown to reduce healthcare costs in real-world clinical practice. This difference is reflected in labeled indications.

Conclusion:

Given differences in trial- and real-world outcomes, number of prior therapies, and dosing, personalizing the choice of oral PPA is critical to maximizing the benefit for individual patients.
PAH is a condition that causes heart failure. It is important to take medicines to slow down this process. For people with early disease, there are some medicines that can be taken as a tablet rather than as an injection to slow down disease progression. The differences between two of the tablet options ­ selexipag and oral treprostinil, are unclear. We reviewed publications describing how, when and why these medicines are used and how well they work, to improve our understanding of the value of these medicines to people with PAH.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos