Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification in Nonsevere Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Ye, Zi; Scott, Christopher G; Gajjar, Rohan A; Foley, Thomas; Clavel, Marie-Annick; Nkomo, Vuyisile T; Luis, S Allen; Miranda, William R; Padang, Ratnasari; Pislaru, Sorin V; Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice; Michelena, Hector I.
Afiliación
  • Ye Z; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Scott CG; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Gajjar RA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Foley T; Division of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County.
  • Clavel MA; Division of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Nkomo VT; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
  • Luis SA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Miranda WR; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Padang R; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Pislaru SV; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Enriquez-Sarano M; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
  • Michelena HI; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833585
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Aortic valve calcification(AVC) is prognostic in patients with aortic stenosis(AS). We assessed the AVC prognostic value in nonsevere AS patients. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

We conducted a retrospective study of 395 patients with nonsevere AS, LV ejection fraction ≥50%. The Agatston method was used for computed tomography AVC assessment. The log-rank test determined the best AVC cutoffs for survival under medical surveillance 1185 AU in men and 850 in women, lower than the established-cutoffs for severe AS(2064AU in men and 1274 in women). Patients were divided into three AVC groups based on these cutoffs low(<1185 AU men and <850 women), sub-severe(1185-2064AU men and 850-1274 women) and severe(>2064AU men and >1274 women). Of 395 patients(mean age 73 ± 12 years, 60.5% men, aortic valve area 1.23 ± 0.30cm2, mean pressure gradient 28 ± 8 mmHg), 218 underwent aortic valve intervention(AVI) and 158 deaths occurred during follow-up, 82 before AVI. Median survival time under medical surveillance was 2.1[0.7-4.9]years. Compared to the low AVC group, both sub-severe and severe AVC groups had higher risk for all-cause death under medical surveillance after comprehensive adjustment including echocardiographic AS severity and coronary artery calcium score(all p ≤ 0.006); while mortality risk was similar between sub-severe and severe AVC groups(all p ≥ 0.2). This mortality risk pattern persisted in the overall survival analysis after adjustment for AVI. AVI was protective of all-cause death in the sub-severe and severe AVC(all p ≤ 0.01), but not in the low AVC groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Sub-severe AVC is a robust risk-stratification parameter in patients with nonsevere AS and may inform AVI timing.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article