Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT) Study: Design and Report on the Inaugural Cohort.
Lee, Cecilia S; Ferguson, Alina N; Gibbons, Laura E; Walker, Rod; Su, Yu-Ru; Krakauer, Chloe; Brush, Michael; Kam, Jason; Larson, Eric B; Arterburn, David E; Crane, Paul K.
Afiliación
  • Lee CS; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Ferguson AN; The Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Gibbons LE; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Walker R; The Roger and Angie Karalis Johnson Retina Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Su YR; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Krakauer C; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Brush M; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Kam J; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Larson EB; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Arterburn DE; Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Crane PK; Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 100(1): 309-320, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875039
ABSTRACT

Background:

Conflicting research on retinal biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) is likely related to limited sample sizes, study design, and protocol differences.

Objective:

The prospective Eye Adult Changes in Thought (Eye ACT) seeks to address these gaps.

Methods:

Eye ACT participants are recruited from ACT, an ongoing cohort of dementia-free, older adults followed biennially until AD/ADRD, and undergo visual function and retinal imaging assessment either in clinic or at home.

Results:

330 participants were recruited as of 03/2023. Compared to ACT participants not in Eye ACT (N = 1868), Eye ACT participants (N = 330) are younger (mean age 70.3 versus 71.2, p = 0.014), newer to ACT (median ACT visits since baseline 3 versus 4, p < 0.001), have more years of education (17.7 versus 16.2, p < 0.001) and had lower rates of visual impairment (12% versus 22%, p < 0.001). Compared to those seen in clinic (N = 300), Eye ACT participants seen at home (N = 30) are older (77.2 versus 74.9, p = 0.015), more frequently female (60% versus 49%, p = 0.026), and have significantly worse visual acuity (71.1 versus 78.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, p < 0.001) and contrast sensitivity (-1.9 versus -2.1 mean log units at 3 cycles per degree, p = 0.002). Cognitive scores and retinal imaging measurements are similar between the two groups.

Conclusions:

Participants assessed at home had significantly worse visual function than those seen in clinic. By including these participants, Eye ACT provides a unique longitudinal cohort for evaluating potential retinal biomarkers of dementia.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Alzheimers Dis Asunto de la revista: GERIATRIA / NEUROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Alzheimers Dis Asunto de la revista: GERIATRIA / NEUROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos