Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of treatment response measures in cutaneous sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Pidala, Joseph A; Onstad, Lynn; Baumrin, Emily; Carpenter, Paul A; Cutler, Corey S; Arai, Sally; Kitko, Carrie L; Chen, George Liwei; Lee, Stephanie J.
Afiliación
  • Pidala JA; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States.
  • Onstad L; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States.
  • Baumrin E; Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Carpenter PA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research Division, Seattle, Washington, United States.
  • Cutler CS; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Arai S; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States.
  • Kitko CL; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Chen GL; Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States.
  • Lee SJ; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Blood Adv ; 2024 Jun 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885484
ABSTRACT
Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current NIH Response Measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs. rituximab, and a Consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different Consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline, and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 subjects were included (training 183, validation 164). While multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, PROM total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0-3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (AUC 0.83 training, 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the HAP AAS, SF36 vitality change, LSS skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC 0.86 training, 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment response, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Adv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Adv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos