Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation.
Horvath, Sarah; Wang, Li; Calo, William; Yazer, Mark H.
Afiliación
  • Horvath S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H103, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States. Electronic address: Shorvath1@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
  • Wang L; Department of Public Health Sciences, A210, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
  • Calo W; Department of Public Health Sciences, A210, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
  • Yazer MH; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Contraception ; : 110530, 2024 Jun 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906503
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To perform cost analyses of foregoing RhD blood type testing and administration of Rh immunoglobulin (RhIg) for bleeding in pregnancy at <12 weeks gestation in the United States. STUDY

DESIGN:

We created a decision-analytic model comparing the current standard treatment pathway for patients who have threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortion in the United States, with a new pathway foregoing RhD testing and administration of RhIg for those who are RhD-negative at <12 weeks gestation, assuming that the risk of sensitization is 0%. We derived population and cost estimates from the current literature and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to screen to avoid one case of fatal hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. We performed sensitivity analyses assuming Rh-sensitization risks of 1.5% and 3% and varying the subsequent pregnancy rates from 44% to 100%.

RESULTS:

The annual savings to health care payers in the United States of foregoing RhD testing and RhIg administration with bleeding events at <12 weeks are $5.5 million/100,000 total pregnancies, assuming the sensitization risk is 0%. In sensitivity analyses with a sensitization risk of 1.5% and subsequent pregnancy rate of 84.3% foregoing Rh testing and RhIg administration would save $2.8 million/100,000 pregnancies, with a NNT of 7322 and a number needed to screen of 48,816. At a 3% sensitization rate, the current standard treatment pathway is most economical.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is an opportunity to save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies by withholding RhIg in specific situations and conserving it for use later in pregnancy. IMPLICATIONS Cost analyses support foregoing RhD blood type screening and RhIg administration at <12 weeks gestation if the sensitization rate is <3%. By deimplementing this low-value care, payers in the United States can save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies and conserve RhIg for use later in pregnancy.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Contraception Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article