Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Timing of multivessel revascularization in stable patients with STEMI: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Voll, Felix; Kuna, Constantin; Scalamogna, Maria; Kessler, Thorsten; Kufner, Sebastian; Rheude, Tobias; Sager, Hendrik B; Xhepa, Erion; Wiebe, Jens; Joner, Michael; Byrne, Robert A; Schunkert, Heribert; Ndrepepa, Gjin; Stähli, Barbara E; Kastrati, Adnan; Cassese, Salvatore.
Afiliación
  • Voll F; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Kuna C; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Scalamogna M; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • Kessler T; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Munich, Germany.
  • Kufner S; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Rheude T; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Sager HB; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Munich, Germany.
  • Xhepa E; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Wiebe J; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Joner M; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Munich, Germany.
  • Byrne RA; Cardiovascular Research Institute Dublin and Department of Cardiology, Mater Private Network, Dublin, Ireland; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Schunkert H; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Munich, Germany.
  • Ndrepepa G; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Stähli BE; Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kastrati A; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Munich, Germany.
  • Cassese S; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: cassese@dhm.mhn.de.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936467
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES:

Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) without cardiogenic shock. The present network meta-analysis investigated the optimal timing of MV-PCI in this context.

METHODS:

We pooled the aggregated data from randomized trials investigating stable STEMI patients with multivessel CAD treated with a strategy of either MV-PCI or culprit vessel-only PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization.

RESULTS:

Among 11 trials, a total of 10 507 patients were randomly assigned to MV-PCI (same sitting, n=1683; staged during the index hospitalization, n=3460; staged during a subsequent hospitalization within 45 days, n=3275) or to culprit vessel-only PCI (n=2089). The median follow-up was 18.6 months. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, MV-PCI staged during the index hospitalization significantly reduced all-cause death (risk ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.92; P=.008) and ranked as possibly the best treatment option for this outcome compared with all other strategies. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, a MV-PCI reduced cardiovascular mortality without differences dependent on the timing of revascularization. MV-PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, significantly reduced myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, with no significant difference between each other.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, represents the safest and most efficacious approach. The different timings of multivessel PCI did not result in any significant differences in all-cause death. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023457794).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En / Es Revista: Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En / Es Revista: Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania