Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between SeHCAT test and clinical response to cholestyramine in patients with chronic diarrhea and high suspicion of bile acid malabsorption: A single-center prospective study.
Schiepatti, Annalisa; Bossert, Irene; Cincotta, Marta; Zanini, Carolina Arianna; Maimaris, Stiliano; D'Ambrosio, Daniela; Trifirò, Giuseppe; Biagi, Federico.
Afiliación
  • Schiepatti A; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
  • Bossert I; Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
  • Cincotta M; Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA SB IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
  • Zanini CA; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
  • Maimaris S; Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
  • D'Ambrosio D; Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Trifirò G; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
  • Biagi F; Medical Physics Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA SB IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
J Dig Dis ; 25(5): 279-284, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973129
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to evaluate the clinical response to cholestyramine in patients with functional chronic diarrhea and a high clinical suspicion of bile-acid diarrhea (BAD) investigated with 75-selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) test.

METHODS:

Adult patients attending our outpatient clinic between January and December 2021 for chronic diarrhea with suspicion of BAD were proposed SeHCAT testing and a therapeutic trial of cholestyramine 4-8 g daily. Clinical response to cholestyramine was evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical and demographic data were analyzed according to SeHCAT test results.

RESULTS:

Among the 50 patients with chronic diarrhea and clinical suspicion of BAD, 13 (26.0%) refused either SeHCAT testing or cholestyramine therapy. Finally, 37 patients (31 females, age 44 ± 14 years) agreed to undergo SeHCAT and were started on cholestyramine (median follow-up 14 months [interquartile range 6-16 months]). Initial response to cholestyramine was similar in patients with positive and negative SeHCAT test results, but improved over time in those with a positive test result. Long-term response (100% vs 65.2%, P = 0.02) and necessity of maintenance therapy for symptom control were more common in those with positive SeHCAT test result (71.4% vs 26.1%, P = 0.02). However, response to cholestyramine was also frequent in patients with a negative test result.

CONCLUSIONS:

The SeHCAT test accurately identifies patients with BAD who benefit from long-term cholestyramine treatment. Nevertheless, cholestyramine may be also effective in patients with chronic diarrhea but negative SeHCAT test result.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ácidos y Sales Biliares / Resina de Colestiramina / Diarrea Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Dig Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ácidos y Sales Biliares / Resina de Colestiramina / Diarrea Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Dig Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia