Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Primary Tumour Detection in Carcinoma of Unknown Primary with Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Tongue Base Mucosectomy: A Meta-analysis.
Gupta, Keshav Kumar; Khan, Hamad; Mughal, Zahir; De, Mriganka; Sharma, Neil; Garas, George.
Afiliación
  • Gupta KK; Head & Neck Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. keshav.gupta@nhs.net.
  • Khan H; Head & Neck Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Mughal Z; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall, UK.
  • De M; Head & Neck Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Sharma N; Head & Neck Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Garas G; Head & Neck Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(9): 6065-6076, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980583
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) represents a challenging diagnostic process when standard work-up fails to identify the primary tumour site. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic utility and complication profile of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) tongue base mucosectomy (TBM) in the management of CUP. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

An electronic database search was performed in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to obtain an estimate of the overall proportion for the detection and complication rates.

RESULTS:

Nine studies representing 235 patients with CUP who had TORS TBM were included in the final analysis. The overall pooled tumour detection rate was 66.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 56.1-75.8]. The incidence of tumour detection in human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive cases (81.5%, 95% CI 60.8-96.4) was significantly higher than HPV-negative cases (2.3%, 95% CI 0.00-45.7). Weighted overall complication rate was 11.4% (95% CI 7.2-16.2). The majority were grade I or II (80%) according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

CONCLUSIONS:

This meta-analysis suggests TORS to be safe and effective in localising the primary tumour site in patients with CUP. While the current data supports the use of TORS in patients who are HPV positive, larger numbers of HPV-negative cases are required to determine the true diagnostic effect with TORS before any valid conclusions can be inferred in this particular subgroup. Further research should focus on high quality prospective trials with stringent methodological work-up to minimise heterogeneity and allow for more accurate statistical analysis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido