Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using OR Black Box Technology to Determine Quality Improvement Outcomes for In-situ Timeout and Debrief Simulation.
Campbell, Krystle K; Abreu, Andres A; Zeh, Herbert J; Daniel, William C; Palter, Vanessa N; Bishop, Samantha J; Sims, Suzanne; Odeh, Jaffer M; Evans, Kim; Dandekar, Priya; Scott, Daniel J.
Afiliación
  • Campbell KK; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Abreu AA; Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Zeh HJ; Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Daniel WC; Health Quality and Safety, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Palter VN; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Bishop SJ; Health Quality and Safety, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Sims S; Surgical Services, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Odeh JM; Department of Anesthesiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Evans K; Health Quality and Safety, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Dandekar P; Surgical Services, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Scott DJ; UT Southwestern Simulation Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Ann Surg ; 2024 Jul 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38989569
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to determine quality improvement outcomes following the pilot implementation of an in-situ simulation designed to enhance surgical safety checklist performance.

BACKGROUND:

OR Black Box (ORBB) technology allows near real-time assessment for surgical safety checklist performance. Before our study, timeout quality was 73.3%, compliance was 99.9%, and engagement was 89.7% (n=1993 cases); Debrief Quality was 76.0%, compliance was 66.9%, and engagement was 66.7% (n=1842 cases).

METHODS:

This IRB-approved study used prospective convergent multi-methods. During 2 months, a 15-minute in-situ simulation, incorporating rapid cycle deliberate practice, was implemented for OR teams. ORBB analytics generated Timeout and Debrief scores for actual operations performed by surgeons who participated in simulation (Sim-group) versus those who did not (No-sim group) over 6 months, including 2 months pre-intervention, during-intervention, and post-intervention. Inductive content analysis was performed based on simulation discussions to determine team member perspectives.

RESULTS:

Thirty simulations with 163 interprofessional participants were conducted. ORBB data from 1570 cases were analyzed. Scores were significantly better for the Sim-group compared with the No-sim group for debrief quality (84% vs. 79% P<0.001, during-intervention), compliance (73% vs. 66%, P<0.001, post-intervention), and engagement (80% vs. 73%, P=0.012, during-intervention). There were no between-group differences for Timeout scores. Thematic analysis identified 2 primary categories "culture of safety" and "policy."

CONCLUSIONS:

This simulation-based QI intervention created a psychologically safe training environment for OR teams. The novel use of ORBB technology facilitated outcome analysis and showed significantly better Debrief scores for simulation-trained surgeons compared with nontrained surgeons.

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article