Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An in-vivo study of the safety of copper-containing intrauterine devices in 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
Moy, Jeffrey; Landon, Matthew; Vigilante, John; Lehmann, Benjamin; DeChambeau, Amber; Rohlfing, Frederick; Marks, Robert.
Afiliación
  • Moy J; Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 204, San Diego, CA, 92134, USA.
  • Landon M; Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 204, San Diego, CA, 92134, USA.
  • Vigilante J; Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 204, San Diego, CA, 92134, USA.
  • Lehmann B; Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 204, San Diego, CA, 92134, USA.
  • DeChambeau A; Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 204, San Diego, CA, 92134, USA.
  • Rohlfing F; Department of Radiology, Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group, 300 Fir Street, San Diego, CA, 92101, USA.
  • Marks R; Department of Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34800 Bob Wilson Drive, Suite 204, San Diego, CA, 92134, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 2024 Jul 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023566
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate whether women with copper-containing intrauterine devices (Cu-IUD), currently listed as MR conditional, can safely undergo 3.0 Tesla (3 T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS:

73 women, age 18-54 years old, with a Cu-IUD who were undergoing MRI for any reason were included consecutively. Pre- and post-MRI standard pelvic ultrasound examinations were completed to determine the appropriate pre- and post-MRI positioning of the Cu-IUD. Displaced IUDs were defined by IUD crossbars not in the fundal portion of the endometrial cavity, a visualized tip in the mid or lower uterus, any part of the device located in the cervical canal or outside of the endometrial canal, a fractured device, or a non-visualized IUD. Additionally, a questionnaire was completed by participants to determine the level of pre- and post-MRI pelvic pain.

RESULTS:

There were zero observed displaced Cu-IUDs on post-MRI pelvic ultrasounds (p = 0/70, 95% CI 0, .043). Three participants were dropped from the study due to malpositioned IUDs on pre-MRI pelvic ultrasound. Six patients reported new or worsening pelvic pain/discomfort during or after their MRI examination.

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that performing 3 T MRI using a low SAR setting does not cause displacement of Cu-IUDs, with zero out of 70 patients demonstrating IUD displacement.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos