Systematic review of treatment for pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis of the hand.

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Pyogenic flexor tenosynovitis (PFT) comprises 2.5-9.4% of all primary hand infections. Management is variable, including surgical intervention, systemic antibiotics, or both. However, there are no evidence-based treatment guidelines. We conducted a systematic review to determine the best evidence for existing interventions and a meta-analysis to summarise published data quantitatively. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase (OVID) databases were searched in January 2023 and March 2024. Screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. The risk of bias was assessed using National Institute of Health study assessment tools. A protocol is available on PROSPERO (CRD42023411142), and the review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data analysis was performed in RStudio. RESULTS: 24 studies (n = 1108 patients) were included following screening of 2386 abstracts. All were retrospective (18 case series and six cohort studies). Surgical interventions were assessed in 22 studies, combined with specific antibiotic regimes in four studies. Two studies described non-operative management alone. The pooled mean hospital stay for those undergoing operative intervention was 8.3 days (SD 7.5, n = 552), compared to 4.76 days (SD 0.12, n = 58) for non-operative intervention. Two studies reported PROMs (DASH), reporting no difference when comparing operative and non-operative interventions. Most studies were of poor quality (20), with four being fair. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence in favour of one intervention regarding hospital stay or PROMs, including the superiority of operative management or non-operative approaches. Given the prevalence of PFT, management should be guided by robust data. Future experimental studies of surgical techniques and comparisons with non-operative management are warranted.