Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of PROphet Test in Changing Physicians' Therapeutic Decision-Making for Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Gandara, David R; Subramanian, Janakiraman; Santos, Edgardo S; Brody, Yehuda; Sela, Itamar; Elon, Yehonatan; Harel, Michal; Reiner-Benaim, Anat; Lahav, Coren; McGregor, Kimberly.
Afiliación
  • Gandara DR; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: drgandara@ucdavis.edu.
  • Subramanian J; Division of Thoracic Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA.
  • Santos ES; Division of Oncology, Florida Atlantic Institute, Aventura, FL.
  • Brody Y; Research and Development, OncoHost, Binyamina, Israel.
  • Sela I; Research and Development, OncoHost, Binyamina, Israel.
  • Elon Y; Research and Development, OncoHost, Binyamina, Israel.
  • Harel M; Research and Development, OncoHost, Binyamina, Israel.
  • Reiner-Benaim A; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  • Lahav C; Research and Development, OncoHost, Binyamina, Israel.
  • McGregor K; Scientific Affairs, OncoHost, Cary, NC.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 25(6): e252-e261.e4, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034168
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) regimens are approved for first-line treatment of metastatic nononcogene-driven NSCLC. Guidelines do not differentiate which patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% should receive ICI monotherapy. The clinically validated PROphet NSCLC plasma proteomic-based test is designed to inform this therapeutic decision.

METHODS:

One hundred oncologists were presented with 3 "virtual" metastatic NSCLC cases with PD-L1 scores and asked to recommend an approved first-line regimen. They then watched an online educational webinar on the PROphetNSCLC test. Postwebinar, the same cases were represented with the addition of a PROphet result, and oncologists again recommended a first-line regimen. Responses were compared to assess the impact on first-line treatment selection.

RESULTS:

Treatment recommendation changed in 39.6% of PROphet-tested cases, with 93% of physicians changing at least 1 case. In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group, 89% of physicians changed their recommendation, followed by 77%, in PD-L1 < 1%, and 36% in PD-L1 1% to 49%. ​In the PD-L1 ≥ 50%, PROphet POSITIVE group, the recommendation for ICI monotherapy increased from 60% to 89%. ​For the PD-L1 ≥ 50%, PROphet NEGATIVE group, the recommendation for monotherapy dropped from 60% to 9%. In the PD-L1 < 1%, PROphet NEGATIVE group, 35% of patients were spared toxicity from ICI compared to 11% in PROphet untested cases.

CONCLUSION:

Adding PROphet to PD-L1 expression impacted therapeutic decision making in first-line NSCLC. PROphet identifies those predicted to have an overall survival benefit from ICI monotherapy versus combination versus chemotherapy, improving the probability of efficacy and reducing toxicity for some patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas / Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico / Inmunoterapia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Lung Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas / Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico / Inmunoterapia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Lung Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article