Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins and Inflammation Process in Hemodialysis Patients: Is There a Role for Adsorption Hemodiafiltration?
Fabbrini, Paolo; Vergani, Denise; Malinverno, Anna; Pieruzzi, Federico; Marengo, Marita; Merlotti, Guido; Medana, Claudio; Quercia, Alessandro Domenico; Cantaluppi, Vincenzo.
Afiliación
  • Fabbrini P; Nephrology Department, ASST-Nord milano, AO Bassini, Cinisello Balsamo-Milano, Italy.
  • Vergani D; Nephrology Department, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
  • Malinverno A; Nephrology Department, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
  • Pieruzzi F; Nephrology Department, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
  • Marengo M; Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical Specialties, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Merlotti G; Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Piemonte Orientale (UPO), "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  • Medana C; Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Quercia AD; Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical Specialties, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Cantaluppi V; Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Piemonte Orientale (UPO), "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Blood Purif ; 52 Suppl 1: 85-94, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39047694
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Despite major advances in the field of dialysis, there are still some unmet needs such as reducing inflammation through adequate depuration. It is well known that the wide spectrum of pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic uremic toxins are inefficiently removed by current dialysis techniques. Adsorption seems to be an extra tool to remove toxins, but its effect and optimization have not been widely studied. The aim of this report was to present preliminary results regarding the possibility of performing hemodiafiltration with a highly adsorptive polymethylmethacrylate membrane.

METHODS:

The study was first conducted in 10 patients in which the safety and feasibility of hemodiafiltration with PMMA BG-U 2.1 membrane were tested through measurement of hemolysis indices, transmembrane pressures, and dialysis adequacy. Twenty patients were prospectively observed for 18-month period in which they consecutively underwent standard hemodialysis, standard post-dilution hemodiafiltration, and polymethylmethacrylate-based post-dilution hemodiafiltration. Protein-bound uremic toxins concentrations and inflammatory markers were measured throughout the observed period.

RESULTS:

HDF-PMMA was inferior to HDF in convective volume, but KT/V was similar, and no differences were noted in operating pressures during the two treatments. During HDF-PMMA period of treatment, we observed a significant reduction of CPR levels, and HDF-PMMA was superior to all other treatments in hepcidin removal even if this did not significantly affect hemoglobin levels. HDF-PMMA could significantly reduce indoxyl sulfate (indoxyl) concentration over a period of 6 months but not for p-cresyl sulfate (p-cresyl).

CONCLUSION:

PMMA BG-U 2.1 membrane can be safely and efficiently used in hemodiafiltration. Moreover, as these preliminary results show, adding adsorption properties to convection and diffusion enabled an increased removal of indoxyl uremic toxin associated to a reduction in inflammation markers as CRP and hepcidin without any negative impact on albumin levels.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Purif / Blood Purification / Blood purif Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Purif / Blood Purification / Blood purif Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia