Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic impact of selection criteria of current adjuvant endocrine therapy trials NATALEE and monarchE in postmenopausal HRpos/HER2neg breast cancer patients treated with upfront letrozole.
Fasching, Peter A; Hack, Carolin C; Nabieva, Naiba; Maass, Nicolai; Aktas, Bahriye; Kümmel, Sherko; Thomssen, Christoph; Wolf, Christopher; Kolberg, Hans-Christian; Brucker, Cosima; Janni, Wolfgang; Dall, Peter; Schneeweiss, Andreas; Marme, Frederik; Sütterlin, Marc W; Ruebner, Matthias; Theuser, Anna-Katharin; Kellner, Sara; Hofmann, Nadine M; Böhm, Sybille; Almstedt, Katrin; Lück, Hans-Joachim; Schmatloch, Sabine; Kalder, Matthias; Uleer, Christoph; Jurhasz-Böss, Ingolf; Hanf, Volker; Jackisch, Christian; Müller, Volkmar; Rack, Brigitte; Belleville, Erik; Wallwiener, Diethelm; Rody, Achim; Rauh, Claudia; Bayer, Christian M; Uhrig, Sabrina; Goossens, Chloë; Huebner, Hanna; Brucker, Sara Y; Hein, Alexander; Fehm, Tanja N; Häberle, Lothar.
Afiliación
  • Fasching PA; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: peter.fasching@uk-erlangen.de.
  • Hack CC; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Nabieva N; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Maass N; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Aktas B; Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Kümmel S; Interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum an den Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
  • Thomssen C; Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
  • Wolf C; Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Kolberg HC; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany.
  • Brucker C; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
  • Janni W; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
  • Dall P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Municipal Clinical Center, Lüneburg, Germany.
  • Schneeweiss A; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Marme F; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Sütterlin MW; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Ruebner M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Theuser AK; Institut für Frauengesundheit GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Kellner S; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Hofmann NM; Institut für Frauengesundheit GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Böhm S; Institut für Frauengesundheit GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Almstedt K; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germa
  • Lück HJ; Gynäkologisch-Onkologische Praxis Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Schmatloch S; Elisabeth Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
  • Kalder M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
  • Uleer C; Gyn.-onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany.
  • Jurhasz-Böss I; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Hanf V; Frauenklinik, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany.
  • Jackisch C; Frauenklinik Sana Klinikum, Offenbach, Germany.
  • Müller V; Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Rack B; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
  • Belleville E; ClinSol GmbH & Co KG., Würzburg, Germany.
  • Wallwiener D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Rody A; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Rauh C; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Bayer CM; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; WMC HEALTHCARE GmbH, München, Germany.
  • Uhrig S; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Goossens C; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Huebner H; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Brucker SY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Hein A; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
  • Fehm TN; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Häberle L; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Cente
Eur J Cancer ; 209: 114239, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39059184
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The monarchE and NATALEE trials demonstrated the benefit of CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy in adjuvant breast cancer (BC) treatment. Patient selection, based on clinical characteristics, delineated those at high (monarchE) and high/intermediate recurrence risk (NATALEE). This study employed a historical patient cohort to describe the proportion and prognosis of patients eligible for adjuvant CDK4/6i trials.

METHODS:

Between 2009 and 2011, 3529 patients were enrolled in the adjuvant PreFace clinical trial (NCT01908556). Eligibility criteria included postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HRpos) BC for whom a five-year upfront therapy with letrozole was indicated. Patients were categorized into prognostic groups according to monarchE and NATALEE inclusion criteria, and their invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS:

Among 2891 HRpos patients, 384 (13.3 %) met the primary monarchE inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 261) qualified due to having ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes. For NATALEE, 915 out of 2886 patients (31.7 %) met the eligibility criteria, with 126 patients (13.7 %) being node-negative. Patients from monarchE with ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes and NATALEE with stage III BC exhibited the poorest prognosis (3-year iDFS rate 0.87). Patients ineligible for the trials demonstrated prognoses similar to the most favorable patient groups within the eligibility criteria.

CONCLUSION:

Patient populations eligible for monarchE and NATALEE trials differed. Nearly a third of the postmenopausal HRpos population, previously under upfront letrozole treatment, met the NATALEE prognostic eligibility criteria. As certain eligible groups had a prognosis similar to non-eligible patients, it might be interesting to explore additional patient groups for CDK4/6i therapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Posmenopausia / Selección de Paciente / Letrozol Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Posmenopausia / Selección de Paciente / Letrozol Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article