Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Regorafenib versus TACE Combined with Camrelizumab in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Untreatable Progression After TACE Combined with Sorafenib Therapy: A Case Control Study.
Ren, Yanqiao; Liu, Yiming; Song, Songlin; Zheng, Chuansheng.
Afiliación
  • Ren Y; Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Song S; Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Zheng C; Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Cancer Control ; 31: 10732748241275004, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39163892
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib (hereafter, TACE-regorafenib) or camrelizumab (hereafter, TACE-camrelizumab) for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with untreatable progression after TACE and sorafenib therapy.

METHODS:

The medical records of patients with HCC who received TACE-regorafenib or TACE-camrelizumab between September 2018 and December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS:

A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study, with 41 and 35 patients in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups, respectively. The objective response rates in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups were 9.8% and 8.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.859). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disease control rates between the two groups (61.0% vs 68.6%, P = 0.838). The median OS was 11 months in the TACE-regorafenib group and 10 months in the TACE-camrelizumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.348). The TACE-regorafenib group had a median PFS of 7 months, which was significantly longer than that of the TACE-camrelizumab group (4 months, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the two groups (P = 0.544).

CONCLUSIONS:

TACE-regorafenib was safe, well-tolerated, and showed promising efficacy in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC, whereas TACE-camrelizumab demonstrated similar survival benefits.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Compuestos de Fenilurea / Piridinas / Quimioembolización Terapéutica / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados / Sorafenib / Neoplasias Hepáticas Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Control Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Compuestos de Fenilurea / Piridinas / Quimioembolización Terapéutica / Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados / Sorafenib / Neoplasias Hepáticas Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Control Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China