Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of intravenous magnesium sulphate infusion on total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in adult dogs: A randomized, blinded trial.
Júnior, Gilberto Serighelli; Comassetto, Felipe; Conterno, Gabriela Borges; Victor de Souza, João; de Souza Ferreira, William; Griebeler, Leonardo Bergmann; Oleskovicz, Nilson.
Afiliación
  • Júnior GS; Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, PR, Brazil. Electronic address: gilbertojr97@hotmail.com.
  • Comassetto F; Department of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Agro-Veterinary Sciences (CAV), Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Conterno GB; Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Victor de Souza J; Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
  • de Souza Ferreira W; Veterinary Clinical Pathology, São Paulo State University (UNESP/Botucatu), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Griebeler LB; Veterinary Anesthesiology, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • Oleskovicz N; Department of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Agro-Veterinary Sciences (CAV), Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 2024 Jul 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39181818
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate cardiopulmonary, arterial blood gas and propofol-sparing effects of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) constant rate infusion (CRI) in mechanically ventilated dogs maintained under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. STUDY

DESIGN:

Blinded, randomized, clinical trial. ANIMALS A total of 24 healthy adult dogs.

METHODS:

Dogs were premedicated with intramuscular acepromazine (0.05 mg kg-1) and morphine (0.5 mg kg-1), followed by an intravenous (IV) bolus of saline or MgSO4 (50 mg kg-1 over 15 minutes) and propofol (given to effect to induce anesthesia). Anesthesia was maintained with an IV propofol infusion (beginning at 0.3 mg kg-1 minute-1, adjusted as necessary). Concurrently, one of three IV infusions were administered GS (0.9% NaCl), GM30 (MgSO4, 30 mg kg-1 hour-1) or GM80 (MgSO4, 80 mg kg-1 hour-1). Propofol induction and maintenance doses were recorded. The following variables were recorded at baseline (T0), after bolus treatment (T1), after beginning mechanical ventilation (T5) and every 15 minutes until the end of the procedure (T15-T120) mean arterial pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, end-tidal partial pressure of CO2, temperature, blood gas variables, indirect calorimetry and extubation time. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS:

Propofol induction bolus dose was lower in GM30 (31.2%, p = 0.04) and GM80 (38.9%, p = 0.003) than in GS. The maintenance propofol infusion rate in GM80 was 16.9% lower (p = 0.03), resulting in fewer propofol CRI rescues during the perioperative period. GM30 and GM80 exhibited faster extubation times than GS (46.2%, p = 0.002 and 48.9%, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Infusion of a 50 mg kg-1 bolus, followed by CRI of MgSO4 (30 and 80 mg kg-1 hour-1), reduces the propofol induction and maintenance (CRI) requirement, maintaining cardiorespiratory stability and reducing the time required to extubation.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Vet Anaesth Analg Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Vet Anaesth Analg Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article