Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) in Ultrasound Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.
Patil, Yashraj; Dhande, Aryaman; Khaladkar, Sanjay M; Kirdat Patil, Prajakta P.
Afiliación
  • Patil Y; Radiodiagnosis, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
  • Dhande A; Radiodiagnosis, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
  • Khaladkar SM; Radiodiagnosis, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
  • Kirdat Patil PP; Radiodiagnosis, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Cureus ; 16(8): e66560, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252735
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) affects a significant proportion of women, particularly around the ages of menarche and menopause. While ultrasonography is a primary diagnostic tool for AUB, techniques like the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) scoring system have enhanced diagnostic accuracy for endometrial abnormalities. IETA provides a standardized approach to evaluating endometrial features, which aids in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions.

METHODS:

This study applied the IETA scoring system to the ultrasound evaluation of 50 women presenting with AUB. The study assessed various endometrial characteristics, including thickness, echogenicity, midline appearance, junction regularity, and vascular patterns. Data were analyzed to correlate IETA scores with histopathological findings and to compare the ultrasound features of benign and malignant lesions.

RESULTS:

The study found that non-uniform endometrial characteristics and irregular midline appearances were more common in malignant lesions. Specifically, interrupted or irregular endometrial-myometrial junctions, absence of the bright edge, higher color scores, and complex vascular patterns were significantly associated with malignancy. Mean endometrial thickness was notably higher in malignant cases compared to benign ones, with a statistically significant difference. The most frequent IETA scores were 7, 12, and 13.

CONCLUSION:

Integrating the IETA scoring system into ultrasound evaluation enhances the detection of endometrial abnormalities, improving the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. This approach provides a reliable framework for diagnosing and managing AUB, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures and facilitating better clinical decision-making.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article