Detecting HRD in whole-genome and whole-exome sequenced breast and ovarian cancers.

Breast and ovarian cancers harboring homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) are sensitive to PARP inhibitors and platinum chemotherapy. Conventionally, detecting HRD involves screening for defects in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other relevant genes. Recent analyses have shown that HRD cancers exhibit characteristic mutational patterns due to the activities of HRD-associated mutational signatures. At least three machine learning tools exist for detecting HRD based on mutational patterns. Here, using sequencing data from 1,043 breast and 182 ovarian cancers, we trained Homologous Recombination Proficiency Profiler (HRProfiler), a machine learning method for detecting HRD using six mutational features. HRProfiler's performance is assessed against prior approaches using additional independent datasets of 417 breast and 115 ovarian cancers, including retrospective data from a clinical trial involving patients treated with PARP inhibitors. Our results demonstrate that HRProfiler is the only tool that robustly and consistently predicts clinical response from whole-exome sequenced breast and ovarian cancers.

Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Predicts Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Platinum Response From Histologic Slides.

PURPOSE: Cancers with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) can benefit from platinum salts and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Standard diagnostic tests for detecting HRD require molecular profiling, which is not universally available. METHODS: We trained DeepHRD, a deep learning platform for predicting HRD from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathological slides, using primary breast (n = 1,008) and ovarian (n = 459) cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). DeepHRD was compared with four standard HRD molecular tests using breast (n = 349) and ovarian (n = 141) cancers from multiple independent data sets, including platinum-treated clinical cohorts with RECIST progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR), and overall survival (OS) endpoints. RESULTS: DeepHRD predicted HRD from held-out H&E-stained breast cancer slides in TCGA with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.85). This performance was confirmed in two independent primary breast cancer cohorts (AUC, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71 to 0.82]). In an external platinum-treated metastatic breast cancer cohort, samples predicted as HRD had higher complete CR (AUC, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.93]) with 3.7-fold increase in median PFS (14.4 v 3.9 months; P = .0019) and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.45 (P = .0047). There were no significant differences in nonplatinum treatment outcome by predicted HRD status in three breast cancer cohorts, including CR (AUC, 0.39) and PFS (HR, 0.98, P = .95) in taxane-treated metastatic breast cancer. Through transfer learning to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, DeepHRD-predicted HRD samples had better OS after first-line (HR, 0.46; P = .030) and neoadjuvant (HR, 0.49; P = .015) platinum therapy in two cohorts. CONCLUSION: DeepHRD can predict HRD in breast and ovarian cancers directly from routine H&E slides across multiple external cohorts, slide scanners, and tissue fixation variables. When compared with molecular testing, DeepHRD classified 1.8- to 3.1-fold more patients with HRD, which exhibited better OS in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and platinum-specific PFS in metastatic breast cancer.

The Complexity of Tobacco Smoke-Induced Mutagenesis in Head and Neck Cancer.

Tobacco smoke, alone or combined with alcohol, is the predominant cause of head and neck cancer (HNC). Here, we further explore how tobacco exposure contributes to cancer development by mutational signature analysis of 265 whole-genome sequenced HNC from eight countries. Six tobacco-associated mutational signatures were detected, including some not previously reported. Differences in HNC incidence between countries corresponded with differences in mutation burdens of tobacco-associated signatures, consistent with the dominant role of tobacco in HNC causation. Differences were found in the burden of tobacco-associated signatures between anatomical subsites, suggesting that tissue-specific factors modulate mutagenesis. We identified an association between tobacco smoking and three additional alcohol-related signatures indicating synergism between the two exposures. Tobacco smoking was associated with differences in the mutational spectra and repertoire of driver mutations in cancer genes, and in patterns of copy number change. Together, the results demonstrate the multiple pathways by which tobacco smoke can influence the evolution of cancer cell clones.