Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 5(9): 1059-1067, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537335

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine outcomes of our approach to managing a large cohort of patients with Sprint Fidelis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) leads. BACKGROUND: The optimal management approach for patients with leads under advisory is unknown. Concerns regarding the risk of device infection and complications associated with delaying lead extraction have recently been suggested to argue against abandoning leads under advisory. METHODS: All patients with a Sprint Fidelis lead implanted at our institute were included. Lead management options were discussed with patients who presented for device surgery at the time of device upgrade, lead fracture, or elective replacement indicator. Implantation of a new lead with abandonment of the Sprint Fidelis lead was the recommended strategy. Patients were subsequently followed at the device clinic at 6-month intervals and were enrolled prospectively in a longitudinal registry. RESULTS: A total of 520 patients had Sprint Fidelis leads implanted between December 2003 and October 2007 at the study center; 217 patients underwent lead replacement (213 underwent a lead abandonment strategy and 4 underwent a lead extraction strategy). Mean follow-up after lead replacement was 55 ± 33 months. In patients undergoing lead abandonment, 10 of 213 (4.7%) had a procedural complication and 3 of 213 (1.4%) developed subsequent device infection requiring system extraction. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a Sprint Fidelis lead, implanting a new lead without prophylactic extraction may be a feasible and safe strategy but requires longer follow-up.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Remoção de Dispositivo , Idoso , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/normas , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Remoção de Dispositivo/instrumentação , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Recall de Dispositivo Médico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Ann Transl Med ; 6(1): 15, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29404361

RESUMO

Lateral medullary syndrome (LMS), also known as Wallenberg's syndrome, PICA syndrome, results from occlusion of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, with associated infarction of parts of medulla oblongata, and cerebellum on the ipsilateral side. It often manifests as various patterns of sensory, motor, and autonomic deficits. While sensorimotor dysfunction presents as a predicted pattern of clinical signs and symptoms, autonomic dysfunction is usually less clinically apparent, and can be easily mistaken as a concomitant pathology in the end organ it affects. In this case, we present a case of an unusual pattern of cardiac arrhythmia as the first objective finding of LMS, caused by autonomic instability following infarction of vagus nerve nuclei in the medulla.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA