Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 49(9): e100-e103, 2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34694274

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: We compared detection of Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , and Trichomonas vaginalis using dry and wet self-collected samples using brushes among females who engage in sex work in Mombasa, Kenya. Detection of T. vaginalis and N. gonorrhoeae in dry and wet samples was similar, but C. trachomatis detection in dry samples appeared lower.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Trichomonas vaginalis , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Chlamydia trachomatis , Feminino , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Quênia/epidemiologia , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Prevalência , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico
2.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 78(3): 276-282, 2018 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29543635

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about fertility desire in HIV-positive female sex workers. Fertility desire could increase HIV transmission risk if it was associated with condomless sex or lower adherence to antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among 255 HIV-positive female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya. Using generalized estimating equations, fertility desire was evaluated as a risk factor for semen detection in vaginal secretions by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, a biomarker of condomless sex, detectable plasma viral load (VL), and HIV transmission potential, defined as visits with positive PSA and detectable VL. RESULTS: The effect of fertility desire on PSA detection varied significantly by nonbarrier contraception use (P-interaction < 0.01). At visits when women reported not using nonbarrier contraception, fertility desire was associated with higher risk of semen detection [82/385, 21.3% vs. 158/1007, 15.7%; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12 to 2.23]. However, when women used nonbarrier contraception, fertility desire was associated with lower risk of PSA detection (10/77, 13.0% vs. 121/536, 22.6%; aRR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.94). Fertility desire was not associated with detectable VL (31/219, 14.2% vs. 128/776, 16.5%; aRR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.45) or higher absolute risk of transmission potential (10/218, 4.6% vs. 21/769, 2.7%; adjusted risk difference = 0.011, 95% CI -0.031 to 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Fertility desire was associated with higher risk of biological evidence of semen exposure when women were not using nonbarrier contraceptives. Low HIV transmission potential regardless of fertility desire suggests that the combination of condoms and antiretroviral therapy adherence was effective.


Assuntos
Fertilidade , Infecções por HIV/virologia , Profissionais do Sexo , Sexo sem Proteção , Carga Viral , Biomarcadores , Feminino , Humanos , Quênia , Limite de Detecção , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Sêmen/virologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA