Calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty in fractures of the femoral neck: a prospective observational study of 68 hips.

INTRODUCTION: The indications for cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been expanded due to encouraging results. However, no evidence in cases of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is available. We aimed to prospectively obtain data on the safety and the clinical outcomes of a cementless calcar-guided short stem in patients with FNFs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of 68 patients diagnosed with FNFs who underwent short-stem THA between 2016 and 2019 with a calcar-guided stem. Complications during follow-up leading to revision were documented, and patient reported outcome measurements recorded. Stem migration was analyzed using the Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analysis Femoral Component Analysis software. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 33.8 ± 14.8 months. The patient mortality at last follow-up was 10.6%. Two patients required stem revision, due to periprosthetic fracture and late aseptic loosening, respectively, corresponding to 96.2% stem survival. Survivorship for the endpoint of revision for any reason was 91.1% at 6 years. All revisions occurred in females. The mean Harris Hip Score at the last follow-up was 93.0 ± 8.9. The mean axial migration at last follow-up was 1.90 ± 1.81 mm. No significant influence on migration was found regarding gender, age, weight, and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and radiological findings were satisfying and most patients benefited from the minimally invasive procedure. However, as for conventional THA as well, implant survivorship and mortality were markedly worse compared to results regarding osteoarthritis. Especially in elderly female patients with FNF, cementless short-stem THA is a concern and a cemented THA should be the first choice.

An isoelastic monoblock cup versus a modular metal-back cup: a matched-pair analysis of clinical and radiological results using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse software.

INTRODUCTION: Bone preservation and long-term survival are the main challenges in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). A good bone stock is especially important for adequate anchorage of the cup in revision cases. However, the optimal acetabular cup design for preserving good bone stock is still unclear. We aimed to compare clinical outcome, radiological alterations, migration, and wear at mid-term for two different cup types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective matched-pair study was performed using the data for 98 THA cases treated with a monoblock cup composed of vitamin E-blended highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE; monoblock group) or a modular cup composed of a highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) without an antioxidant (modular group). Clinical results were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The obtained radiographs were analyzed for radiological alterations, migration, and wear using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA) software. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 73.2 ± 19.2 months (range: 32-108 months) and 60.5 ± 12.2 months (range: 20-84 months) in the monoblock and modular groups, respectively. HHS improved to 95.7 points in the monoblock group and 97.6 points in the modular group, without significant differences (p = 0.425). EBRA measurements were obtained in all cases. Acetabular bone alterations were not detected on radiological assessments. Mean cup migration was 1.67 ± 0.92 mm (range: 0.46-3.94 mm) and 1.24 ± 0.87 mm (range: 0.22-3.62 mm) in the monoblock and modular groups. The mean wear rate was 0.21 ± 0.18 mm (range: 0.00-0.70 mm) and 0.20 ± 0.13 mm (range: 0.00-0.50 mm) in the monoblock and modular groups. Both migration and wear pattern showed no significant differences (p = 0.741 and 0.243). None of the cases required revision surgery, yielding an implant survival rate of 100% in both groups. CONCLUSION: The isoelastic press-fit monoblock VEPE cup and modular metal-back HXLPE cup showed equivalent mid-term wear and cup migration. Long-term studies are required to determine the effects of modularity, isoelasticity, and polyethylene stabilization with vitamin E on cup loosening and survival rates.

Optimism and pessimism are antithetically associated with post-operative knee function in patients' undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Personality traits, such as dispositional optimism and pessimism, have impact on a variety of health-related problems. Influence on outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could only be shown for other personality trait concepts, but not for dispositional optimism/pessimism. This study aims to examine the association of dispositional optimism/pessimism with pre-operative joint function and post-operative outcome in TKA. METHODS: Data were acquired in a multicentre, cross-sectoral, prospective study (the PROMISE Trial). Patients were followed for 12 months post-operatively. Dispositional optimism/pessimism was measured pre-operatively via the revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R), pre- and post-operative function was measured via the 12 Item Knee-osteoarthritis outcome Scores (KOOS-12). Log-linear regression models considering known confounders and t-test were carried out to show the association of LOT-R scores with pre- and post-operative KOOS-12 scores. RESULTS: 740 patients were analyzed. Optimistic LOT-R was significantly positively associated to the mean scores of KOOS-12 pre- and post-operative, while pessimistic LOT-R was significantly associated negatively (pre-operative: optimistic p = 0.001, pessimistic p = 0.001; post-operative optimistic: 3M p = 0.001, 6M p = 0.001, 12M p = 0.001; post-operative pessimistic: 3M p = 0.01, 6M p = 0.004, 12M p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Optimism was positively associated with pre-operative joint function and, more importantly, post-operative functional outcome in TKA, while pessimism was associated with the opposite. Assessing patients' general personality traits prior to surgery to identify pessimistic patients, hence being at risk for poor outcome in TKA, should be considered to react to the patients' special needs and possible pessimistic expectations, i.e., through a cognitive-behavioral intervention, to potentially increase optimism and hereby post-operative outcome in TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

Comparison of radiation exposure and surgery time between an intraoperative CT with automatic surface registration and a preoperative CT with manual surface registration in navigated spinal surgeries.

PURPOSE: This retrospective matched case-control study was conducted to compare two CT based surgery techniques for navigated screw placement in spinal surgery, whether a reduction of radiation exposure and surgery time could be achieved. METHODS: We matched cases treated with an intraoperative CT (iCT), regarding the type and number of implants, with cases treated with a preoperative CT (pCT) of one main surgeon. Outcome measures were radiation exposure due to intraoperative control x-rays, radiation exposure due to CT images, and the duration of surgery. RESULTS: The required radiation exposure could be significantly reduced in the iCT group. For the intraoperative control X-rays by 69% (median (MED) 88.50/standard deviation (SD) 107.84 and MED 286.00/SD 485.04 for iCT and pCT respectively-in Gycm2; p < 0.001) and for the CT examinations by 25% (MED 317.00/SD 158.62 and MED 424.50/SD 225.04 for iCT and pCT respectively-in mGycm; p < 0.001) with no significant change in surgery time. The correlation between the number of segments fused and the necessary surgery time decreased significantly for the iCT group (Pearson product-moment-correlation: r = 0.569 and r = 0.804 for iCT and pCT respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results show that spinal navigation using an intraoperative CT with automatic registration compared to a preoperative CT and intraoperative manual surface registration, allows a significant reduction of radiation exposure, without prolonged surgery time. A significant benefit regarding cut-to-suture-time can be gained with surgeries of a larger scale.

Downsizing in total hip arthroplasty. A short stem as a revision implant.

BACKGROUND: Short stems have constantly gained popularity in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) over the last decade. Although cementless short stems are not primarily designed to be used as revision implants, there may be certain indications for which downsizing the femoral component in failed conventional THA is potentially advantageous. METHODS: In this single center retrospective case series, six patients who underwent revision using a calcar-guided short stem after failed THA are presented. The mean follow-up was 3.32 years (SD 0.63 years). The health status was evaluated by the EQ-5D-5L score. Patient reported outcome measurements (PROM) were recorded using the Harris hip score (HHS) and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Pain and satisfaction were assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Radiographic analysis was performed by evaluating osteolysis, stress shielding, alignment and signs of aseptic loosening. Complications were documented. RESULTS: At last follow-up the mean EQ-5D-5L index was 0.851 (SD 0.098). Clinical outcome was excellent (HHS ≥ 90) in 4 patients and moderate (HHS 71 and 79) in 2 patients. The mean WOMAC score was 9.20% (SD 12.61%). Pain and satisfaction on VAS were 1.00 (SD 1.15) and 9.17 (SD 0.37), respectively. No major complications occurred. To date, no further revision surgery was needed. Radiologically, no signs of subsidence, aseptic loosening, stress shielding and fractures were obvious. CONCLUSION: The present case series indicates that in failed conventional THA downsizing may be considered a treatment option, using short stem THA in selected cases.

Conversion of failed internal fixation in proximal femur fractures using calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Reoperations for secondary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, or hardware failure following failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) or femoral neck fracture (FNF) are common. An effective salvage treatment often involves complete removal of the hardware followed by total hip arthroplasty (THA). Almost no data are available regarding conversion to short-stem THA. This study aimed to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes, potential complications, and the survival rate of short-stem THA following revision surgery. METHODS: We investigated 27 patients who underwent conversion THA using a calcar-guided short stem. Patient-reported outcome measurements were obtained, including the Harris hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, as well as pain and satisfaction on the visual analogue scale. Radiological follow-up was also performed. RESULTS: We identified 18 (66.7%) patients diagnosed with FNF and 9 (33.3%) patients with ITF. Clinical and radiological outcomes were satisfactory at the last follow-up (30.56 ± 11.62 months). One patient required early revision surgery due to dislocation and greater trochanter fracture. At the last follow-up, none of the short stems required revision. No other major complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Given the low rate of complications and 100% survival, our findings indicate that short stems for conversion THA due to failed internal fixation may be considered an option in a properly selected patient population. However, it should not be considered a standard procedure and should only be performed by experienced surgeons.

The concept of a cementless isoelastic monoblock cup made of highly cross-linked polyethylene infused with vitamin E: radiological analyses of migration and wear using EBRA and clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The newest generation of cementless titanium-coated, isoelastic monoblock cup with vitamin E-blended highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) was introduced to the market in 2009. The aim of the present study was to obtain mid-term follow-up data including migration and wear analyses. METHODS: This prospective study investigated 101 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases in 96 patients treated at a single institution. Patients were allowed full weight-bearing on the first day postoperatively. Harris hip score (HHS) and pain and satisfication on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 79.0 months. Migration and wear were assessed using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse (EBRA) software. Radiological acetabular bone alterations and complications were documented. RESULTS: At mid-term follow-up (mean 79.0 months, range: 51.8-101.7), 81 cases with complete clinical and radiological data were analyzed. Utilisable EBRA measurements were obtained for 42 hips. The mean HHS was 91.1 (range 38.0-100.0), VAS satisfaction was 9.6 (range 6.0-10.0), VAS rest pain was 0.2 (range 0.0-4.0), and VAS load pain was 0.6 (range 0.0-9.0). Mean migration was 0.86 mm (range: 0.0-2.56) at 24 months and 1.34 mm (range: 0.09-3.14) at 5 years, and the mean annual migration rate was 0.22 (range: - 0.24-1.34). The mean total wear was 0.4 mm (range: 0.03-1.0), corresponding to a mean annual wear rate of 0.06 mm per year (range: 0.0-0.17). Radiographic analysis did not reveal any cases of osteolysis, and no revision surgeries had to be performed. CONCLUSIONS: After using vitamin-E blended HXLPE in cementless isoelastic monoblock cups, there were no obvious signs of osteolysis or aseptic loosening occurred. No patients required revision surgery after mid-term follow-up. Cup migration and wear values were well below the benchmarks considered predictive for potential future failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number on ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04322916 (retrospectively registered at 26.03.2020).

Primary stability of calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: migration analysis using EBRA-FCA.

INTRODUCTION: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a disabling condition that often results in secondary arthritis necessitating total hip arthroplasty (THA). Short-stem THA has constantly gained popularity. It remains controversial, whether ONFH represents a risk factor for failure after the implantation of short stems with pronounced metaphyseal anchorage. The potential spread of the osteonecrotic area and bone marrow edema into the metaphyseal bone might result in compromised stability. Early implant migration is considered predictive of subsequent aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was a migration analysis of a modern, calcar-guided short-stem implant in patients with ONFH in a mid-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis investigated the migration pattern of 45 calcar-guided short stems in patients with ONFH, using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse Femoral-Component-Analysis (EBRA-FCA). Influencing factors such as ARCO categories, age, gender, body weight and BMI were analyzed. Complications and adverse events were documented. RESULTS: At mid-term [48.1 months (SD 20.7 months)], mean axial migration was 1.56 mm (SD 1.77 mm). Mean migration rate stabilized after 2 years. No influence of ARCO categories, age and BMI was found. A tendency of increased axial migration was observed in male patients and in overweight patients. No revision surgeries had to be performed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a migration pattern comparable to that of primary osteoarthritis patients with slight initial migration under full load followed by subsequent stabilization in the metaphyseal femur. The 100% survival rate at mid-term supports the usage of this short-stem design in patients with ONFH.

[Disproportionately increased incidence of proximal femoral fractures in a level one trauma center : Epidemiological analysis from 2016 to 2022]. / Überproportional angestiegene Inzidenz proximaler Femurfrakturen in einem Level-One-Traumazentrum : Epidemiologische Analyse von 2016 bis 2022.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures represent the most frequent fracture entity in Germany accounting for more than 20% of all fractures. According to a decision of the Federal Joint Committee from 2019, proximal femoral fractures also have to be surgically treated within 24 h. In order to quantify a subjectively perceived increase in workload in trauma surgery at a supraregional trauma center, a retrospective analysis of the number of surgically treated proximal femoral fractures was performed. Proximal femoral fractures were chosen due to their high incidence and homogeneous treatment. METHODS: Using ICD-10 codes, all surgically treated proximal femoral fractures from 2016 to 2022, including the patient's zip code, were retrieved from the database of the trauma center. RESULTS: The number of surgically treated proximal femoral fractures doubled from 2016 to 2022. The highest increase (60%) was recorded from 2020 to 2022. Heat maps show an increase in the catchment area radius as well. CONCLUSION: When compared (inter)nationally, a disproportionate increase in the amount of surgically treated proximal femoral fractures was recorded at the trauma center studied. The increase of the catchment area radius and the number of patients treated in the urban area show that less and less hospitals participate in emergency treatment. Possible explanations are a lack of resources aggravated by the recent COVID-19 pandemic and a lack of qualified personnel, interface problems between the federal states or the strict requirements of the Federal Joint Committee in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. It must be assumed that there is a clearly increased workload for all professions involved in the trauma center investigated, although the infrastructure has remained unchanged.

Functional outcomes after intramedullary nailing (C-Nail®) of severe calcaneal fractures with mean follow-up of 36 months.

PURPOSE: Calcaneal fractures (CFs) are rare but potentially debilitating injuries. Apart from the open, far lateral or sinus tarsi approach, operative treatment can be performed minimally invasive and percutaneously with intramedullary nailing. In this study, we sought to investigate the functional outcome of severe CFs treated with the C-Nail® implant. METHODS: Twenty-two CFs (9 × Sanders III and 8 × Sanders IV), operated between 2016 and 2019, were followed up with a mean duration of 36 (± 11) months. The AOFAS score, pre- and postoperative Böhler angles, wound healing disorders, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) like pain levels and return to work/sport levels were assessed. RESULTS: The mean AOFAS score was 72.0 (± 9.8). Four patients sustained wound healing disorders, yet no implant-associated surgical revision was required. Fifty percent of patients were pain-free within 1 year. Within 1 year, about 50% of the patients could return to sports, and about 80% of the patients could return to work. PROMs and functional results align with those from other implants reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: Intramedullary nailing of severe CFs with the C-Nail® implant can be considered a safe treatment alternative that yields acceptable results at mid-terms.

Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears Might Not Be an Urgency: The Time to Meniscus Repair Does Not Seem to Affect the Mid-Term Outcome-A Retrospective Study of Sixty Tears with a Mean Follow-Up of 6 Years.

Background: Bucket-handle meniscal tears are mostly treated arthroscopically. However, there is no clear evidence as to whether the time to surgery impacts the outcome and whether or not lesions should be treated urgently. Methods: Sixty patients were interviewed about the current status of their knee with a mean follow-up of 6.1 years (SD = 3.5). Forty-one patients underwent meniscus repair, and fifteen patients received partial resections. The primary outcome was the rate of reoperation after meniscus repair. Secondary outcomes were pain at rest and during exercise, return to sports, and Tegner and Lysholm scores. Results: The average time to surgery was 14.4 days, with no significant impact of surgical timing on the rate of reoperation. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in pain levels, return to sports, or Tegner and Lysholm scores based on the timing of surgery. Conclusions: In our cohort, the time to surgery was not a prognostic factor for the reoperation rate or postoperative outcome in repairing bucket-handle meniscal tears. Therefore, arthroscopic repair should not be performed in an emergency setting but conducted after careful planning by experienced arthroscopy surgeons. Regarding the return to sports, postoperative factors such as rehabilitation protocols or surgical techniques could be more important than the time to surgery.

Cementless Short Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Chances and Limits. / Zementfreie Kurzschaftprothesen in der Hüftendoprothetik: Möglichkeiten und Limits.

In recent decades, a large number of cementless short stems have been introduced to the market. The concept aims at saving soft tissue using minimally invasive surgery and at the same time preserving as much bone as possible. In particular, the latest generation of short stems, which are implanted using a calcar-guided round-the-corner technique, are attracting increasing attention. An individualised resection level allows individual stem alignment and thus an ideal reconstruction of the hip anatomy. The early clinical results of short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) are promising and have led to an expansion of the indications and limitations for the use of short stems. In particular, the individual positioning in valgus or varus and the resulting individual metaphyseal or metadiaphyseal anchorage offers various possibilities to reconstruct even abnormal joint morphologies. Consequently, short stems are increasingly used in patients with complex anatomical variations or in cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. In some various cases, they can also be used in revision or conversion arthroplasty. In some patients, short stems can also be used after femoral neck fracture. Currently, scientific data on those areas of indication of short-stem THA is scarce.

Secondary Osseous Integration of Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty After Internal Fixation of a Felix Type IIIB Fracture: A Case Report.

CASE: A 76-year-old man presented with periprosthetic tibial plateau fracture (TPF), with a completely loosened tibial component 3 weeks after cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Internal fixation by buttress plating was performed, and the tibial component was retained and left in situ primarily as a spacer. Revision was planned after fracture consolidation, but at 3 months, the patient was able to walk without support, without pain, and with full range of motion. At 1 year, he is free of complaints. The initial loosened tibial component reintegrated. CONCLUSION: Internal fixation combined with preserving the loosened tibial component may be a treatment option for TPF involving a cementless UKA.

One-stage bilateral versus unilateral short-stem total hip arthroplasty: A matched-pair analysis of 216 hips.

BACKGROUND: One-stage, bilateral, short-stem total hip arthroplasty (1B-ssTHA) represents an alternative to staged, unilateral, short-stem total hip arthroplasty (U-ssTHA); however, the safety and reliability of 1B-ssTHA remain unknown. The objective of the present study was to compare the functional outcomes, complications, and mortality rates between 1B-ssTHA and U-ssTHA at mid-term. METHODS: A retrospective, matched-pair study was performed, including 216 short stems implanted in 162 patients. Among the study population, 54 patients were treated with 1B-ssTHA. Patients were matched by gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. A total of 46 full matches could be accomplished. The mean follow-up time for the 1B-ssTHA group was 61.7 months (standard deviation [SD] 6.2 months), compared with was 63.4 months (SD 8.0 months) for the U-ssTHA group. Mortality, complication, and revision rates were documented. For clinical examinations, the visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate satisfaction, rest pain, and load pain, and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was determined. RESULTS: No surgery-related deaths were observed. At mid-term, none of the 1B-ssTHA patients required stem revision. The rate of complications for both groups was low. The mean drop in haemoglobin measured in the 1B-ssTHA group was 4.42 mg/dl, compared with 3.18 mg/dl in the U-ssTHA group. The mean HHS in the 1B-ssTHA group was 98.3 points (SD 2.80), whereas, in the U-ssTHA group, the mean HHS was 97.9 points (SD 3.44) (p = 0.478). Satisfaction rates were significantly higher in the 1B-ssTHA group (p = 0.04) than in the U-ssTHA group, whereas no significant differences were found for pain at rest and pain at load (p = 0.56 and p = 0.26, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that 1B-ssTHA is an effective and beneficial procedure for a select population. Mortality, complications, implant survival, and clinical outcomes were comparable to those for a matched group with unilateral osteoarthritis treated with U-ssTHA. However, an increase in blood loss must be acknowledged for the 1B-ssTHA procedure.

Can hip resurfacing be safely revised with short-stem total hip arthroplasty? A case series of six patients.

BACKGROUND: The usage of short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has constantly gained popularity over the last decade, however, to date, short stems are not eligible to be used as revision implants. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcome of revision surgery of failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) using short-stem THA. METHODS: In a single center, retrospective analysis, 6 consecutive patients who were treated with a calcar-guided short stem after failure of HRA were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 3.25 years (SD 0.45). Patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) were recorded using the Harris hip score (HHS) and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The health status was evaluated by the EQ-5D-5L score. Pain and satisfaction were obtained using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Radiographic analysis was performed by evaluating osteolysis, stress shielding, alignement and signs of aseptic loosening. Complications were documented. RESULTS: At last follow-up, clinical outcome was excellent (HHS ≥ 90) in 5 patients and good (HHS = 87) in 1 patient. The mean WOMAC score was 5.73% (SD 3.66%). The mean EQ-5D-5L index was 0.914 (SD 0.07). Pain and satisfaction on VAS was 1.83 (SD 5.18) and 8.67 (SD 0.94), respectively. Radiologically, no signs of subsidence, aseptic loosening, stress shielding and fracture were obvious. No major complications occurred. To date, no further revision surgery was needed. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the present case series propose that HRA can be safely revised using short-stem THA in a selected patient group. Clinical and radiological results are encouraging. Based on the present data, short stems may be considered as a revision implant for failed HRA for experienced surgeons.