Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 51(1)2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686681

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atrial tachyarrhythmias are common and difficult to treat in adults with congenital heart disease. Dronedarone has proven effective in patients without congenital heart disease, but data are limited about its use in adults with congenital heart disease of moderate to great complexity. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review of 21 adults with congenital heart disease of moderate to great complexity who were treated with dronedarone for atrial tachyarrhythmias was performed. RESULTS: The median (IQR) age at dronedarone initiation was 35 (27.5-39) years. Eleven patients (52%) were male. Ten patients (48%) had New York Heart Association class I disease, 10 (48%) had class II disease, and 1 (5%) had class III disease. Ejection fraction at initiation was greater than 55% in 11 patients (52%), 35% to 55% in 9 patients (43%), and less than 35% in 1 patient (5%). Prior treatments included ß-blockers (71%), sotalol (38%), amiodarone (24%), digoxin (24%), and catheter ablation (38%). Rhythm control was complete in 5 patients (24%), partial in 6 (29%), and inadequate in 10 (48%). Two patients (10%) experienced adverse events, including nausea in 1 (5%) and cardiac arrest in 1 (5%), which occurred 48 months after initiation of treatment. There were no deaths during the follow-up period. The median (IQR) follow-up time for patients with complete or partial rhythm control was 20 (1-54) months. CONCLUSION: Dronedarone can be effective for adult patients with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias for whom more established therapies have failed, and with close monitoring it can be safely tolerated.


Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos , Dronedarona , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Humanos , Dronedarona/uso terapêutico , Dronedarona/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Adulto , Cardiopatias Congênitas/complicações , Cardiopatias Congênitas/fisiopatologia , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Antiarrítmicos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Amiodarona/uso terapêutico , Amiodarona/efeitos adversos , Amiodarona/análogos & derivados , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Transl Oncol ; 11(3): 664-671, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29621664

RESUMO

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) have one of the poorest survival rates of all cancers. The main reason for this is related to the unique tumor stroma and poor vascularization of PDAC. As a consequence, chemotherapeutic drugs, such as nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, cannot efficiently penetrate into the tumor tissue. Non-invasive radiofrequency (RF) mild hyperthermia treatment was proposed as a synergistic therapy to enhance drug uptake into the tumor by increasing tumor vascular inflow and perfusion, thus, increasing the effect of chemotherapy. RF-induced hyperthermia is a safer and non-invasive technique of tumor heating compared to conventional contact heating procedures. In this study, we investigated the short- and long-term effects (~20 days and 65 days, respectively) of combination chemotherapy and RF hyperthermia in an orthotopic PDAC model in mice. The benefit of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine treatment was confirmed in mice; however, the effect of treatment was statistically insignificant in comparison to saline treated mice during long-term observation. The benefit of RF was minimal in the short-term and completely insignificant during long-term observation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA