Subdural electrodes versus stereoelectroencephalography for pediatric epileptogenic zone localization: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the relative safety and effectiveness of invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes (SDEs) and stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 176 patients who underwent invasive monitoring evaluations at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh between January 2000 and September 2021. To examine differences between SDE and sEEG groups, independent-samples t-tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests for categorical variables were performed. A p value < 0.1 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 134 patients (76%) in the SDE group and 42 (24%) in the sEEG group. There was a difference in the proportion with complications (17.9% in the SDE group vs 7.1% in the sEEG group, p = 0.09) and resection (75.4% SDE vs 21.4% sEEG, p < 0.01) between SDE and sEEG patients. However, there was no observable difference in the rates of postresection seizure freedom at 1-year clinical follow-up (60.2% SDE vs 75.0% sEEG, p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal a difference in rates of surgical complications and resection between SDEs and sEEG. Larger prospective, multi-institutional pediatric comparative effectiveness studies may further explore these associations.

Development of a clinical model to predict vagus nerve stimulation response in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy impacts 470,000 children in the United States. For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and unresectable seizure foci, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a treatment option. Predicting response to VNS has been historically challenging. The objective of this study was to create a clinical VNS prediction tool for use in an outpatient setting. METHODS: The authors performed an 11-year retrospective cohort analysis with 1-year follow-up. Patients < 21 years of age with DRE who underwent VNS (n = 365) were included. Logistic regressions were performed to assess clinical factors associated with VNS response (≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction after 1 year); 70% and 30% of the sample were used to train and validate the multivariable model, respectively. A prediction score was subsequently developed. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Variables associated with VNS response were < 4-year epilepsy duration before VNS (p = 0.008) and focal motor seizures (p = 0.037). The variables included in the clinical prediction score were epilepsy duration before VNS, age at seizure onset, number of pre-VNS antiseizure medications, if VNS was the patient's first therapeutic epilepsy surgery, and predominant seizure semiology. The final AUCs were 0.7013 for the "fitted" sample and 0.6159 for the "validation" sample. CONCLUSIONS: The authors developed a clinical model to predict VNS response in a large sample of pediatric patients treated with VNS. Despite the large sample size, clinical variables alone were not able to accurately predict VNS response. This score may be useful after further validation, although its predictive ability underscores the need for more robust biomarkers to predict treatment response.

Stereotactic laser interstitial thermal therapy corpus callosotomy for the treatment of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Corpus callosotomy is a safe and effective procedure for reducing the frequency of drop attacks. MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) offers a minimally invasive alternative to conventional open craniotomy for callosotomy. We hypothesized that MRgLITT callosotomy could be safely performed in pediatric patients with similar seizure control. METHODS: We present an institutional case series of 11 procedures in 10 patients for the treatment of drop attacks in drug-refractory primary generalized epilepsy. MRgLITT was used for complete callosotomy, anterior two-thirds, posterior, or ablation of residual callosal fibers following prior callosotomy (open or MRgLITT). We retrospectively reviewed clinical course, operative details, radiographic imaging, clinical outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Operative time ranged from 4-8 hours, and median hospitalization was 2 days. No complications were encountered. Among the 7 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up, 71% experienced freedom from drop attacks at longest follow-up and 57% of cases showed improvement in their other seizure semiologies as well (Engel Class II: 28%, Class III: 28%, Class IV: 43%). SIGNIFICANCE: MR-guided LITT callosotomy is safe and effective modality in the management of pediatric patients with medically intractable epilepsy characterized by drop attacks. While this is among the largest pediatric series to date, further studies are required to delineate its safety and efficacy among such patients.

Comparison of traditional and closed loop vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: A propensity-matched retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: For epilepsy patients with drug-resistant, unresectable epilepsy, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an option for seizure control. Approximately 40-70% of patients will achieve ≥50% seizure reduction with VNS. New closed loop VNS models detect ictal tachycardia and responsively stimulate the vagus nerve. The effectiveness of closed loop VNS compared to traditional VNS for pediatric epilepsy is unknown. METHODS: An 11-year retrospective electronic medical record review at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh was performed. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent VNS implantation were included. Patients were divided into groups based on VNS model: traditional versus closed loop. Those who transitioned from traditional to closed loop VNS were excluded. Given potential for selection bias, propensity scores matching was utilized to compare traditional to closed loop VNS patients. Patients with focal versus generalized epilepsy were also separately analyzed. The primary outcome was "VNS response", defined as at least 50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline. RESULTS: A total of 320 patients were included in this sample. The percentage of matched patients (total n = 220: n = 179 traditional VNS, n = 41 closed loop VNS) who responded to VNS after one year of therapy was 43% for traditional VNS and 39% for closed loop VNS (p = 0.64). After two years of therapy, a higher proportion of closed loop VNS patients than traditional VNS patients responded to VNS among all subgroups, though no differences were statistically significant (p>0.05). Notably, for those with generalized epilepsy, 73% of closed loop patients responded to VNS compared to only 46% of traditional patients (p = 0.10). After two years of VNS therapy, patients were taking approximately the same quantity of antiseizure medications as baseline (change of +0.074 +/- 0.90 ) with no difference between VNS models (p = 0.87). SIGNIFICANCE: Among pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, closed loop VNS trends towards a higher rate of VNS response after two years of treatment, especially among generalized epilepsy patients. Neither model of VNS allows patients to reduce antiseizure medication quantity after two years.