Prevalence and prognosis of fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus in The Middle East: a comparative analysis in a 5-year nationwide cohort.

PURPOSE: To analyze the prevalence and progression of fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) in Qatar. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed consecutive index- diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) admissions (2015-2020) among patients with new-onset T1D (NT1D) in Qatar. RESULTS: Of the 242 patients, 2.5% fulfilled the FT1D diagnostic criteria. FT1D patients were younger (median-age 4-years vs.15-years in classic-T1D). Gender distribution in FT1D was equal, whereas the classic-T1D group showed a female predominance at 57.6% (n = 136). FT1D patients had a mean C-peptide of 0.11 ± 0.09 ng/ml, compared to 0.53 ± 0.45 ng/ml in classic-T1D. FT1D patients had a median length of stay (LOS) of 1 day (1-2.2) and a DKA duration of 11.25 h (11-15). The median (length of stay) LOS and DKA duration in classic-T1D patients were 2.5 days (1-3.9) and 15.4 h (11-23), respectively. The FT1D subset primarily consisted of moderate (83.3%) and severe 916.7%) DKA, whereas classic T1D had 25.4% mild, 60.6% moderate, and 14% severe DKA cases. FT1D was associated with a higher median white cell count (22.3 × 103/uL) at admission compared to classic T1D (10.6 × 103/uL). ICU admission was needed for 66.6% of FT1D patients, compared to 38.1% of classic-T1D patients. None of the patients in the FT1D group had mortality, while two died in the classic-T1D group. CONCLUSION: This is the first study establishing the existence of FT1D in ME, which presented distinctively from classic-T1D, exhibiting earlier age onset and higher critical care requirements. However, the clinical outcomes in patients with FT1D seem similar to classic T1D.

A systematic review of literature on Insulin-like growth factor-2-mediated hypoglycaemia in non-islet cell tumours.

INTRODUCTION: Insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF-2)-mediated hypoglycemia is a rare yet clinically significant entity with considerable morbidity and mortality. Existing literature is limited and fails to offer a comprehensive understanding of its clinical trajectory, management and prognostication. METHODS: Systematic review of English-language articles reporting primary patient data on IMH was searched using electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus and Embase) from any date up to 21 December 2022. Data were analysed in STATA-16. RESULTS: The systematic review contains 172 studies, including 1 Randomised controlled trial, 1 prospective observational study, 5 retrospective observational studies, 150 case reports, 11 case series and 4 conference abstracts. A total of 233 patients were analysed, averaging 60.6 ± 17.1 years in age, with comparable proportions of males and females. The commonest tumours associated with Insulin-like Growth Factor-2-mediated hypoglycaemia were fibrous tumours (N = 124, 53.2%), followed by non-fibrous tumours originating from the liver (N = 21, 9%), hemangiopericytomas (N = 20, 8.5%) and mesotheliomas (N = 11, 4.7%). Hypoglycaemia was the presenting feature of NICT in 42% of cases. Predominant clinical features included loss of consciousness (26.7%) and confusion (21%). The mean IGF-2 and IGF-1 levels were 882.3 ± 630.6 ng/dL and 41.8 ± 47.8, respectively, with no significant correlation between these levels and patient outcomes. Surgical removal was the most employed treatment modality (47.2%), followed by medication therapy. The recovery rate was 77%, with chronic liver disease (CLD) significantly associated with a poor outcome (OR: 7.23, P: 0.03). Tumours originating from fibrous tissues were significantly associated with recovery (p < .001). In the logistic regression model, CLD remained a significant predictor of poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: This systematic review highlights that most non-islet-cell tumour-hypoglycaemia (NICTH) is due to fibrous tumours. NICTs demonstrate a variable prognosis, which is fair if originating from fibrous tissue. Management such as octreotide, corticosteroids, diazoxide, embolization, radiotherapy and surgical resection have disparate success rates.

SARS-CoV-2 and chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review.

Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus causing the coronavirus disease of 2019. The disease has caused millions of deaths since the first pandemic at the end of 2019. Immunocompromised individuals are more likely to develop severe infections. Numerous mutations had developed in SARS-CoV-2, resulting in strains (Alfa Beta Delta Omicron) with varying degrees of virulence disease severity. In CML (chronic myeloid leukemia) patients, there is a lot of controversy regarding the effect of the treatment on the patient outcome. Some reports suggested potential better outcomes among patients with CML, likely due to the use of TKI; other reports showed no significant effects. Additionally, it is unknown how much protection immunization provides for cancer patients. Method: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, we conducted a systematic review. Retrospective, prospective studies, reviews, case series, and case reports of chronic myeloid leukemia patients aged above 18 years who had SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. English literature was screened using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. Search terms include chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, and SARS-CoV-2 and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We searched the reference lists of the included studies for any new articles. The search included all articles published up to April 20, 2023. The review is registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022326674). Results: We reviewed 33 articles of available published literature up to April 2023 and collected data from a total of 682 CML patients with COVID-19. Most patients were in the chronic phase, seven were in the accelerated phase, and eight were in the blast phase. Disease severity was classified according to WHO criteria. Mortality was seen in 45 patients, and there were no reports of thrombotic events. Two hundred seventy-seven patients were in the era before vaccination; among them, eight were in the intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality was 30 (11%). There were 405 patients after the era of vaccination; among them, death was reported in 15 (4%) patients and ICU in 13 patients. Limitations and conclusion: The major limitation of this review is the lack of details about the use or hold of TKIs during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, after the appearance of the different variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, few studies mentioned the variant of the virus, which makes it difficult to compare the outcome of the other variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in patients with CML. Despite the limitations of the study, CML patients with COVID-19 have no significant increase in mortality compared to other hematological malignancy. Hematological cancers are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, which is expected to increase in patients with COVID-19. However, patient with CML has not been reported to have a significant increase in thrombosis risk. The available data indicates that COVID-19's effect on patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) still needs to be better understood due to the limited data. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php? RecordID:326674.