Defining the characteristics of intermediate care models including transitional care: an international Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Although there is growing utilisation of intermediate care to improve the health and well-being of older adults with complex care needs, there is no international agreement on how it is defined, limiting comparability between studies and reducing the ability to scale effective interventions. AIM: To identify and define the characteristics of intermediate care models. METHODS: A scoping review, a modified two-round electronic Delphi study involving 27 multi-professional experts from 13 countries, and a virtual consensus meeting were conducted. RESULTS: Sixty-six records were included in the scoping review, which identified four main themes: transitions, components, benefits and interchangeability. These formed the basis of the first round of the Delphi survey. After Round 2, 16 statements were agreed, refined and collapsed further. Consensus was established for 10 statements addressing the definitions, purpose, target populations, approach to care and organisation of intermediate care models. DISCUSSION: There was agreement that intermediate care represents time-limited services which ensure continuity and quality of care, promote recovery, restore independence and confidence at the interface between home and acute services, with transitional care representing a subset of intermediate care. Models are best delivered by an interdisciplinary team within an integrated health and social care system where a single contact point optimises service access, communication and coordination. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified key defining features of intermediate care to improve understanding and to support comparisons between models and studies evaluating them. More research is required to develop operational definitions for use in different healthcare systems.

Predictors of Enrollment in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Spain.

PURPOSE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is very effective for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disorders. The objective of this study was to analyze population factors associated with nonenrollment of cardiac patients in these programs. METHODS: Retrospective study of 756 patients referred to the cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) of a tertiary referral hospital with a service area population of more than 640 000 from January 2009 to June 2012. We assessed the relationship between population characteristics of these patients and nonenrollment by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 2386 hospital admissions for an acute coronary syndrome during the study period. Out of the 2355 patients who were alive at discharge, 756 (632 men and 124 women) were referred for CR (32.1% vs 3% state average and vs 51% European average). Of these patients, 20.9% did not enroll. The referral rate was lower among women than among men (P < .001). The characteristics associated with a lower rate of enrollment in the program were age (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.09), living alone (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 2.53-8.16), living further than 50 km from the CR unit (OR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.29-6.41) and, in women, having a history of cardiovascular disease (recurrent myocardial infarction) (OR: 6.35; 95% CI: 2.53-11.81). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of referral for CR in our setting is well above the national average but still could be improved. We identified older age, living alone, travel distance to the cardiac rehabilitation unit, and, in women, a history of a previous myocardial infarction as barriers to enrollment in CRPs.