Prevention of anthracycline-t and trastuzumabinduced decline in left ventricular ejection fraction with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker: a narrative systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a complication of selected cancer therapy agents associated with decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have established benefits in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but their efficacy for preventing CTRCD remains controversial. This narrative systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of ACEI/ARB in the prevention of cancer therapy LVEF decline. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from January 1980 to June 2022. Studies of interest were randomised controlled trials of patients with normal LVEF and active malignancy receiving cancer therapy, randomised to receive either an ACEI or ARB compared with a control group. The outcome was the change in LVEF from baseline to the end of the follow-up period. Death, clinical heart failure and adverse drug reactions were recorded. A total of 3731 search records were screened and 12 studies were included, comprising a total of 1645 participants. Nine studies assessed the prevention of anthracycline-induced LVEF decline, of which five showed a beneficial effect (1%-14% higher LVEF in treated groups), whereas four studies showed no effect. Three studies assessed the prevention of trastuzumab-induced LVEF decline, of which one showed a beneficial effect (4% higher LVEF) in a subset of participants. There are mixed data regarding the efficacy of ACEI/ARB in preventing the LVEF decline in patients undergoing anthracycline or trastuzumab therapy, with evidence suggesting no clinically meaningful benefit observed in recent studies.

Factors that affect risk for pancreatic disease in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pancreatic diseases place significant burdens on health care systems worldwide. However, there is lack of agreement about which factors increase or reduce risk for pancreatic disease. We reviewed high-quality studies of factors that affect risk for pancreatic diseases in the general population. METHODS: We searched 3 databases (Medline, Embase, and Scopus) for prospective cohort studies of modifiable risk and/or protective factors for acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer in adult populations. Factors that were investigated in 2 or more studies were assessed by meta-analysis if the required data were available. Subgroup analyses were performed when appropriate. Outcome measures were relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Our analysis included 51 population-based studies with more than 3 million individuals and nearly 11,000 patients with pancreatic diseases. A total of 31 different factors were investigated. Current tobacco use was the single most important risk factor for pancreatic diseases (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.54-2.27), followed by obesity (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.15-1.92) and heavy use of alcohol (RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.19-1.58). Tobacco and heavy use of alcohol had bigger effects on risk of acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis than pancreatic cancer. Vegetable consumption (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88) and fruit consumption (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90) provided the greatest degree of protection against pancreatic diseases on the basis of meta-analyses. Vegetable consumption had stronger association with protection against acute pancreatitis and fruit consumption with protection against pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of systematic review and meta-analysis, current tobacco use, obesity, and heavy use of alcohol are associated with significant increases in risk for pancreatic diseases. Vegetables and fruit consumption are associated with reduced risk for pancreatic diseases. Prevention strategies for acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer should consider these factors.

Cardiac complications of COVID-19 infection.

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, studies emerged reporting the occurrence of cardiovascular complications in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2. Initial data were likely skewed by higher risk populations and those with severe disease. Recent, larger studies have corroborated this association and provide estimates for risk of cardiovascular complications. Patients affected by COVID-19 are at increased risk of myocardial infarction, myocarditis, venous thromboembolism, arrhythmias, and exacerbation of heart failure. Furthermore, a subset of patients who recover from the acute illness have persistent symptoms, a condition termed "long COVID", and management of these symptoms is challenging. Clinicians treating patients affected by COVID-19 should remain vigilant for cardiac complications during the acute illness, particularly in high-risk populations.

Infective endocarditis in patients with rheumatic heart disease: a single-centre retrospective comparative study.

AIMS: We reviewed the baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) and compared those with and without rheumatic heart disease (RHD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥15 years with IE treated at Auckland City Hospital between January 2016 and December 2018 and excluded device-related IE and complex congenital heart disease. RHD status was based on echocardiographic features or previous history of rheumatic fever with valvular disease. Microbiologic and echocardiographic results, treatment modalities and complications were recorded. Demographics and outcomes were compared based on RHD status. RESULTS: There were 155 patients with IE. Twenty-two had RHD. The mean age at admission was 45 years for RHD patients, which was 19 years younger than for non-RHD patients. There were significantly more Pacific patients with RHD (55% vs 14%). Previous IE and prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) were more common in RHD patients (27% vs 5%, and 77% vs 29%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 29 months, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the two groups. However, 25/155 patients (16%) had died from IE-related causes (septic or cardiogenic shock post cardiac surgery, or embolic complications), with a significantly higher mortality in patients with RHD (7/22 (32%) patients, HR: 2.5) on univariate analysis. On multivariable analysis, PVE, heart failure, Staphylococcus aureus infection, diabetes, stroke and cardiac abscess were all associated with increased mortality, whereas RHD was not independently associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective single-centre audit, patients with RHD experienced IE at a younger age, had a higher incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis and a prior history of IE. Although there was no difference in all-cause mortality, mortality in patients with RHD was almost exclusively secondary to complications of IE. This highlights the need for prevention strategies against endocarditis in the RHD population, including use of antibiotic prophylaxis¬, accessible dental health care and a high clinical suspicion for IE in RHD by healthcare providers.

Idarucizumab for the treatment of dabigatran-related nephropathy.

Anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN) is a clinical syndrome of acute kidney injury in patients taking vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants. It is associated with increased mortality and there is no specific treatment. We report the case of a 78-year-old man on dabigatran who developed macroscopic haematuria and acute kidney injury 2 weeks after mitral valve repair, reaching a peak creatinine of 415 µmol/L from a normal baseline, which was successfully treated with one course of idarucizumab. This case illustrates the efficacy of an anticoagulant reversal agent for the treatment of ARN.

A pragmatic diagnostic approach to myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries.

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is an increasingly recognised condition and it accounts for approximately 10% of all cases of MI. Despite the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, patients with MINOCA are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. While many well recognised conditions can present as MINOCA, it can be difficult to reach a final diagnosis with certainty due to the relative infrequency of these conditions in the general population and the lack of diagnostic gold-standard tests. The most common causes of MINOCA are myocarditis, coronary vasospasm, coronary plaque disruption and coronary thrombus or embolism. These can be assessed by way of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, intra-coronary imaging modalities and clinically relevant diagnostic blood tests, respectively. There are less common and rarer aetiologies which should be considered in the absence of an apparent cause, each with a unique diagnostic standard. By following a systematic approach of diagnostic tests, an underlying cause of MINOCA can be found in the majority of cases, allowing a directed management strategy to be pursued.