Clinical outcomes for previously treated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis.

Aim: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Materials & methods: Databases were searched for studies evaluating treatments for advanced (unresectable and/or metastatic) BTC patients who progressed on prior therapy. Pooled estimates of objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Across 31 studies evaluating chemotherapy or targeted treatment regimens in an unselected advanced BTC patient population, pooled ORR was 6.9%, median OS was 6.6 months and median PFS was 3.2 months. Conclusion: The efficacy of conventional treatments for previously treated advanced BTC patients is poor and could be improved by novel therapies.

What is this article about? Most patients with biliary tract cancer are identified with advanced disease, and almost all go through a worsening of the disease after their first treatment. For patients who go on to receive their next treatment, current guidelines are unclear regarding the best treatment choice. Therefore, we examined the available medical literature and performed an analysis of multiple studies to calculate overall estimates of the clinical value of standard treatments for these patients. Our goal was to develop a benchmark against which to compare the clinical value of new treatments that are currently being assessed in clinical trials. What were the results? We identified 31 studies assessing standard treatments (involving chemotherapy or molecularly targeted treatments) in previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer patients. Across these studies, the objective tumor response rate was 6.9%, median overall survival was 6.6 months and median progression-free survival was 3.2 months. What do the results of the study mean? These results indicate that there is limited clinical value of standard treatments for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer whose disease worsened after first treatment. This medical need could potentially be met by new treatments, such as immunotherapies that restore the immune system's ability to attack cancer cells and thereby prolong patient survival.

Clinical outcomes of chemotherapy-based therapies for previously treated advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of standard therapies in previously treated, advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases (January 2000-July 2021), annual oncology conferences (2019-2021), and clinicaltrials.gov to identify studies evaluating the use of licensed interventions in second-line or later settings. The primary outcome of interest was objective response rate (ORR) and secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ORR was pooled using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. For survival outcomes, published Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and PFS were digitized to re-construct individual patient-level data and pooled following the methodology described by Combescure et al. (2014). RESULTS: Twenty-three trials evaluating standard chemotherapies with or without targeted therapies across 4,791 advanced CRC patients contributed to our meta-analysis. In the second-line setting, the random effects pooled estimate of ORR was 22.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18.0, 27.1), median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.4, 7.4), and median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI: 13.6, 16.1). In the third-line or later setting, the random effects pooled estimate of ORR was 1.7% (95% CI: 0.8, 2.7), median PFS was 2.3 months (95% CI: 2.0, 2.8), and median OS was 8.2 months (95% CI: 7.1, 9.1). CONCLUSION: Standard treatments have limited efficacy in the second-line or later setting with worsening outcomes in later lines. Given the global burden of CRC, further research into novel and emerging therapeutic options following treatment failure is needed.

Comparison of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy with vemurafenib monotherapy on health-related quality of life in patients with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous BRAF Val600-mutation-positive melanoma (COMBI-v): results of a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: In the COMBI-v trial, patients with previously untreated BRAF Val600Glu or Val600Lys mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma who were treated with the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib had significantly longer overall and progression-free survival than those treated with vemurafenib alone. Here, we present the effects of treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), an exploratory endpoint in the COMBI-v study. METHODS: COMBI-v was an open-label, randomised phase 3 study in which 704 patients with metastatic melanoma with a BRAF Val600 mutation were randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive voice response system to receive either a combination of dabrafenib (150 mg twice-daily) and trametinib (2 mg once-daily) or vemurafenib monotherapy (960 mg twice-daily) orally as first-line therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. In this pre-specified exploratory analysis, we prospectively assessed HRQoL in the intention-to-treat population with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), and Melanoma Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M), completed at baseline, during study treatment, at disease progression, and after progression. We used a mixed-model, repeated measures ANCOVA to assess differences in mean scores between groups with baseline score as covariate; all p-values are descriptive. The COMBI-v trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01597908, and is ongoing for the primary endpoint, but is not recruiting patients. FINDINGS: From June 4, 2012, to Oct 7, 2013, 1645 patients at 193 centres worldwide were screened for eligibility, and 704 patients were randomly assigned to dabrafenib plus trametinib (n=352) or vemurafenib (n=352). Questionnaire completion rates for both groups were high (>95% at baseline, >80% at follow-up assessments, and >70% at disease progression) with similar HRQoL and symptom scores reported at baseline in both treatment groups for all questionnaires. Differences in mean scores between treatment groups were significant and clinically meaningful in favour of the combination compared with vemurafenib monotherapy for most domains across all three questionnaires during study treatment and at disease progression, including EORTC QLQ-C30 global health (7·92, 7·62, 6·86, 7·47, 5·16, 7·56, and 7·57 at weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and disease progression, respectively; p<0·001 for all assessments except p=0·005 at week 40), EORTC QLQ-C30 pain (-13·20, -8·05, -8·82, -12·69, -12·46, -11·41, and -10·57 at weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and disease progression, respectively; all p<0·001), EQ-5D thermometer scores (7·96, 8·05, 6·83, 11·53, 7·41, 9·08, and 10·51 at weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and disease progression, respectively; p<0·001 for all assessments except p=0·006 at week 32), and FACT-M Melanoma Subscale score (3·62, 2·93, 2·45, 3·39, 2·85, 3·00, and 3·68 at weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and disease progression, respectively; all p<0·001). INTERPRETATION: From the patient's perspective, which integrates not only survival advantage but also disease-associated and adverse-event-associated symptoms, treatment with the combination of a BRAF inhibitor plus a MEK inhibitor (dabrafenib plus trametinib) adds a clear benefit over monotherapy with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and supports the combination therapy as standard of care in this population.

Adjusting for the Confounding Effects of Treatment Switching-The BREAK-3 Trial: Dabrafenib Versus Dacarbazine.

BACKGROUND: Patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E mutation-positive melanoma in BREAK-3 showed a median overall survival (OS) of 18.2 months for dabrafenib versus 15.6 months for dacarbazine (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.21). Because patients receiving dacarbazine were allowed to switch to dabrafenib at disease progression, we attempted to adjust for the confounding effects on OS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rank preserving structural failure time models (RPSFTMs) and the iterative parameter estimation (IPE) algorithm were used. Two analyses, "treatment group" (assumes treatment effect could continue until death) and "on-treatment observed" (assumes treatment effect disappears with discontinuation), were used to test the assumptions around the durability of the treatment effect. RESULTS: A total of 36 of 63 patients (57%) receiving dacarbazine switched to dabrafenib. The adjusted OS HRs ranged from 0.50 to 0.55, depending on the analysis. The RPSFTM and IPE "treatment group" and "on-treatment observed" analyses performed similarly well. CONCLUSION: RPSFTM and IPE analyses resulted in point estimates for the OS HR that indicate a substantial increase in the treatment effect compared with the unadjusted OS HR of 0.76. The results are uncertain because of the assumptions associated with the adjustment methods. The confidence intervals continued to cross 1.00; thus, the adjusted estimates did not provide statistically significant evidence of a treatment benefit on survival. However, it is clear that a standard intention-to-treat analysis will be confounded in the presence of treatment switching-a reliance on unadjusted analyses could lead to inappropriate practice. Adjustment analyses provide useful additional information on the estimated treatment effects to inform decision making. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Treatment switching is common in oncology trials, and the implications of this for the interpretation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the novel treatment are important to consider. If patients who switch treatments benefit from the experimental treatment and a standard intention-to-treat analysis is conducted, the overall survival advantage associated with the new treatment could be underestimated. The present study applied established statistical methods to adjust for treatment switching in a trial that compared dabrafenib and dacarbazine for metastatic melanoma. The results showed that this led to a substantially increased estimate of the overall survival treatment effect associated with dabrafenib.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for chemotherapy-based regimens in first-line MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer.

MICRO ABSTRACT: This retrospective observational study assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among first-line MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Of 150 patients in the study cohort, 38.7% were treated with chemotherapy and 61.3% with chemotherapy + EGFR/VEGF inhibitor (EGFRi/VEGFi). Clinical outcomes were better among patients who received chemotherapy + EGFR/VEGF inhibitor than those who received chemotherapy. INTRODUCTION: Prior to pembrolizumab approval in first-line (1L) treatment of MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), patients were managed with chemotherapy with or without an EGFRi or VEGFi, agnostic of biomarker testing or mutation status. This study assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among 1L MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients treated with standard of care (SOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational evaluation of patients ≥18 years diagnosed with stage IV MSI-H/dMMR mCRC who received community-based oncology care. Eligible patients were identified (01-Jun-2017 - 29-Feb-2020) and followed longitudinally until 31-Aug-2020/the last patient record/date of death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Of 150 1L MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients, 38.7% were treated with chemotherapy and 61.3% with chemotherapy + EGFRi/VEGFi. Accounting for censoring, the overall median real-world time to treatment discontinuation (95% CI) was 5.3 (4.4, 5.8) months; 3.0 (2.1, 4.4) and 6.2 (5.5, 7.6) months in the chemotherapy and chemotherapy + EGFRi/VEGFi cohorts, respectively. The combined median overall survival was 27.7 (23.2, not reached [NR]) months; 25.3 (14.5, NR) and 29.8 (23.2, NR) months in the chemotherapy and chemotherapy + EGFRi/VEGFi cohorts, respectively. The overall median real-world progression-free survival was 6.8 (5.3, 7.8) months; 4.2 (2.8, 6.1) and 7.7 (6.1, 10.2) months in the chemotherapy and chemotherapy + EGFRi/VEGFi cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 1L MSI-H/dMMR mCRC patients receiving chemotherapy with EGFRi/VEGFi had better outcomes than those receiving only chemotherapy. An unmet need and opportunity to improve outcomes exists in this population that may be addressed by newer treatments like immunotherapies.

Evaluation and Comparison of Real-World Databases for Conducting Research in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Evaluating whether patient populations in clinico-genomic oncology databases are comparable with whom in other databases without genomic component is important. METHODS: Four databases were compared for colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and stage IV CRC cases: American Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange Biopharma Collaborative (GENIE-BPC), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), SEER-Medicare, and MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental claims databases. These databases were also compared with the SEER registry database which serves as national benchmarks. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and overall survival were compared in patients with newly diagnosed CRC and patients with stage IV CRC across databases. Treatment patterns were further compared in patients with stage IV CRC. RESULTS: A total of 65,976 patients with CRC and 13,985 patients with stage IV CRC were identified. GENIE-BPC had the youngest patient population (mean age [years]: CRC, 54.1; stage IV CRC, 52.7). SEER-Medicare had the oldest patient population (CRC, 77.7; stage IV CRC, 77.3). Most patients were male and of White race across databases. GENIE-BPC had the highest proportion of patients with stage IV CRC (48.4% v other databases 13.8%-25.4%) and patients receiving treatments (95.7% v 37.6%-59.1%). Infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab was the most common regimen across databases accounting for 47.3%-78.5% of patients receiving first line of therapy. The median survival from diagnosis was 36, 94, 44 months (CRC) and 23, 36, 15 months (stage IV CRC) for patients in GENIE-BPC after left truncation, TCGA, and SEER-Medicare databases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with other databases, GENIE-BPC had the youngest patients with CRC with the most advanced disease and the largest proportion of patients receiving treatment. Investigators should consider adjustments when extrapolating results from clinico-genomic databases to the general CRC population.

Clinical Outcomes for Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Although second-line treatments improve survival compared to best supportive care in patients with advanced gastric cancer with disease progression on first-line therapy, prognosis remains poor. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to quantify the efficacy of second-or-later line systemic therapies in this target population. METHODS: A systematic literature review (January 1, 2000 to July 6, 2021) of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL with additional searches of 2019-2021 annual ASCO and ESMO conferences was conducted to identify studies in the target population. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed among studies involving chemotherapies and targeted therapies relevant in treatment guidelines and HTA activities. Outcomes of interest were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) presented as Kaplan-Meier data. Randomized controlled trials reporting any of the outcomes of interest were included. For OS and PFS, individual patient-level data were reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Forty-four trials were eligible for the analysis. Pooled ORR (42 trials; 77 treatment arms; 7256 participants) was 15.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.7-17.5%). Median OS from the pooled analysis (34 trials; 64 treatment arms; 60,350 person-months) was 7.9 months (95% CI 7.4-8.5). Median PFS from the pooled analysis (32 trials; 61 treatment arms; 28,860 person-months) was 3.5 months (95% CI 3.2-3.7). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms poor prognosis among patients with advanced gastric cancer, following disease progression on first-line therapy. Despite the approved, recommended, and experimental systemic treatments available, there is still an unmet need for novel interventions for this indication.

Health-related quality of life in patients treated with pembrolizumab for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient advanced solid tumours: Results from the KEYNOTE-158 study.

BACKGROUND: In the KEYNOTE-158 study (NCT02628067), pembrolizumab showed a high objective response rate and durable clinical benefit for patients with previously treated, unresectable/metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair‒deficient (dMMR) non-colorectal solid tumours. We present health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results from the MSI-H/dMMR population (cohort K). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had previously treated MSI-H/dMMR advanced non-colorectal solid tumours, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and ECOG performance status ≤1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for 35 cycles (2 years). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-3L were administered at baseline, at regular intervals throughout treatment, and 30 days after treatment discontinuation. Prespecified analyses (exploratory endpoints) included the magnitude of change from baseline to post-baseline timepoints in all patients and by the best overall response for QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL, QLQ-C30 functional/symptom scales/items, and EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (VAS) score. RESULTS: At data cutoff (October 5, 2020), 351 patients were enrolled, of whom 311 and 315 completed baseline QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires, respectively. QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scores improved from baseline to week 9 (mean [95% CI] change, 3.07 [0.19-5.94]), then remained stable or improved by week 111, with greater improvements observed in patients with a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (10.85 [6.36-15.35]). Patients with CR/PR showed improvements in physical (5.58 [1.91-9.25]), role (9.88 [3.80-15.97]), emotional (5.62 [1.56-9.68]), and social (8.33 [2.70-13.97]) functioning, and stable cognitive functioning (1.74 [-1.45 to 4.94]). CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab generally improved or preserved HRQoL in patients with previously treated MSI-H/dMMR advanced non-colorectal solid tumours.

Quality of life in hormone receptor-positive HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients during treatment with letrozole alone or in combination with lapatinib.

BACKGROUND: A phase III trial compared lapatinib plus letrozole (L + Let) with letrozole plus placebo (Let) as first-line therapy for hormone receptor (HR)(+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients whose tumors were human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2(+) was significantly longer for L + Let than for Let (8.2 months versus 3 months; p = .019). This analysis focuses on quality of life (QOL) in the HER-2(+) population. METHODS: QOL was assessed at screening, every 12 weeks, and at withdrawal using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B). Changes from baseline were analyzed and the proportions of patients achieving minimally important differences in QOL scores were compared. Additional exploratory analyses evaluated how QOL changes reflected tumor progression status. RESULTS: Among the 1,286 patients randomized, 219 had HER-2(+) tumors. Baseline QOL scores were comparable in the two arms. Mean changes in QOL scores were generally stable over time for patients who stayed on study. The average change from baseline on the FACT-B total score in both arms was positive at all scheduled visits through week 48. There was no significant difference between the two treatment arms in the percentage of QOL responders. CONCLUSION: The addition of lapatinib to letrozole led to a significantly longer PFS interval while maintaining QOL during treatment, when compared with letrozole alone, thus confirming the clinical benefit of the combination therapy in the HR(+) HER-2(+) MBC patient population. This all oral regimen provides an effective option in this patient population, delaying the need for chemotherapy and its accompanying side effects.

Lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone for HER2+ (ErbB2+) metastatic breast cancer: quality-of-life assessment.

The randomized phase III trial EGF100151 demonstrated that the combination of lapatinib plus capecitabine (L + C) significantly improved time to progression (TTP) compared with capecitabine alone (C) in heavily pretreated patients with HER2+ (ErbB2+) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This analysis assessed the effects of study treatments on quality of life (QOL) among patients in EGF100151. Quality of life was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and EuroQoL (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Patients completed questionnaires during efficacy and safety assessment visits (i.e., at screening visit, every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks, every 12 weeks thereafter, and at discontinuation of study treatment). Primary analyses compared the treatment groups based on change from baseline QOL. Exploratory analyses compared proportion of patients achieving minimum important differences (MID) in QOL scores and the relationship between QOL and tumor status. Quality of life for patients in both treatment groups was maintained during 24 weeks of follow-up. Adjusted mean changes from baseline in all QOL scores for the L + C arm were comparable to those for the C arm. The between-group differences ranged from 0.7 to 2.2 (FACT-B total) and 0.3 to 1.8 (EQ-5D visual analog scale) and were consistently in favor of the L + C arm, although not statistically significant. Patients with an objective tumor response or stable disease showed clinically meaningful differences in QOL scores compared to patients with progressive disease. A greater proportion of patients receiving L + C versus C achieved the MID for all five QOL scores, although differences were not statistically significant. The addition of lapatinib to capecitabine significantly increases TTP without any evidence of a deleterious effect on patients' QOL, confirming its clinical benefit in this heavily pretreated patient population with advanced HER2+ breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab therapy.

Analysis of costs associated with administration of intravenous single-drug therapies in metastatic breast cancer in a U.S. population.

BACKGROUND: An estimated $8.1 billion (in 2004 dollars) is spent annually on total health care costs for the treatment of breast cancer in the United States. Breast cancer has traditionally been treated with intravenous (IV) cancer therapies that entail not only the drug acquisition cost, but additional costs of personnel time, supplies, and equipment used in the preparation and administration of the IV drug. A systematic study of the costs of IV administration in the metastatic breast cancer (MBC) population has not been performed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost components, overall and by payer type and patient age group, for administering a single-agent IV breast cancer drug to women with MBC in the United States. METHODS: Women diagnosed with MBC (ICD-9-CM codes 174.XX and 196.XX-198.XX) reported any time between January 1, 2003, and May 31, 2006, and receiving single-agent IV breast cancer therapy (including intramuscular fulvestrant) during a visit were identified (using HCPCS and CPT codes) from an administrative claims database supporting 46 general/oncology clinics in the United States. Study drugs were either FDA-approved for breast cancer or recommended for use as preferred single agents per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer. Costs were estimated using the contracted allowed payment, which is the amount that the provider is eligible to receive from all parties, including payers and patients. Costs were measured using 2 approaches-average cost per IV-administration visit and average cost per patient per month (PPPM). RESULTS: Over the 41-month study period (through May 31, 2006), 46,273 patients had a breast cancer diagnosis, of which 8,533 (18.4%) were metastatic; 828 (9.7%) of these patients received 1 of 11 single-agent IV breast cancer drugs over 7,406 visits. Mean (SD) total payments across all drugs and cost components were $2,477 ($1,842) per visit and $4,966 ($3,841) PPPM, of which IV administration costs were 10.2% of per-visit and 11.4% of PPPM costs, and other drugs and services provided during IV administration were 30.8% of per-visit and 32.2% of PPPM costs. In both the per-visit and PPPM analyses, approximately 80% of costs for other drugs and services (approximately 25% of total treatment costs) were attributed to (a) antihypercalcemic agents (e.g., zoledronic acid: 6%-8% of total treatment cost), (b) colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) (e.g., pegfilgrastim, epoetin: 6%-7%), or (c) other anticancer agents being used off-label or for other conditions (e.g., bevacizumab, irinotecan, carboplatin, vincristine: 11%-12%). The remaining 20% of costs for other drugs and services (about 6% of total costs) were attributable primarily to antiemetic agents (e.g., palonosetron, granisetron) and miscellaneous or unclassified products. Non-protein-bound paclitaxel was the most commonly used IV therapy at a mean cost of $2,804 per visit, with IV administration accounting for $353 (12.6%) and other services accounting for $1,237 (44.1%) of total costs per visit. The second most commonly used IV therapy was trastuzumab at a mean cost of $2,526 per visit, with IV administration accounting for $214 (8.5%) and other services accounting for $336 (13.3%) of total costs per visit. CONCLUSIONS: For patients being administered a single FDA-approved or NCCN-recommended IV drug for treatment of MBC, IV administration costs accounted for approximately 10%-11% of total cost, and the study drugs accounted for 56%-59%. Other drugs and services accounted for 31%-32%, most of which was attributable to antihypercalcemic agents, CSFs, anticancer drugs being used off-label for breast cancer or for other conditions, and antiemetic agents. Although costs of IV administration are 10%-11% of total IV chemotherapy costs for MBC and would clearly be avoided with the use of oral agents, the extent to which other costs would be avoided or incurred with use of oral agents is unknown and requires further research.

Descriptive analysis of concomitant prescription medication patterns from 1999 to 2004 among US women receiving daily or weekly oral bisphosphonate therapy.

BACKGROUND: To improve medication-taking behavior, it is important to identify factors that may contribute to suboptimal compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this descriptive analysis was to identify concurrent prescription medication use (number and type) among women receiving daily or weekly oral bisphosphonate therapy. METHODS: Patient prescription data were collected from November 1999 to June 2004 from a US patient claims database accessed through Wolters Kluwer Health (formerly NDC Health), which represents >65 million patients annually. Women aged >or=50 years who were receiving daily or weekly oral bisphosphonate medication during the study months were included. Concomitant medications were defined based on >or=14 days of prescription supply in the same month as bisphosphonate therapy. Data were examined to determine the frequency with which certain drugs and drug classes were prescribed concomitantly with bisphosphonates. Each study month was treated independently to assess concomitant medication use. RESULTS: Over the study period, the number of female bisphosphonate recipients in the database increased from 78,909 to 250,286. At the end of the study, 16.2%, 12.2%, 8.7%, and 19.1% of bisphosphonate recipients were prescribed 3, 4, 5, or >or=6 concomitant medications, respectively. The most commonly prescribed concomitant drug classes were cholesterol reducers, diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, synthetic thyroid hormones, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, systemic analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs, and antispasmodics/antisecretory drugs. From July 2001 until the end of the study, the number of concomitant medications was higher for women receiving daily bisphosphonates than for those receiving weekly bisphosphonates, 4.16 versus 3.77 as of June 2004. In addition, the mean number of concomitant medications prescribed increased with age: in the aged 50 to 64 years cohort, the aged 65 to 74 years cohort, and the aged >or=75 years cohort, the mean number was 3.09, 3.62, and 3.97, respectively, as of June 2004. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that women prescribed bisphosphonates have a high medication burden, with the majority of patients (56%) taking >or=3 concomitant prescription medications.

Impact of depression on utilization patterns of oral hypoglycemic agents in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) are an important component in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Large-scale studies have demonstrated that tight glycemic control with such agents can reduce the frequency and severity of long-term DM-related complications. OBJECTIVES: The main goal of this study was to examine the impact of depression on utilization patterns of OHAs in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 DM. A secondary objective was to estimate the impact of depression on discontinuation and modification of pharmacotherapy for DM in these patients. METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with type 2 DM during a 3-year period (1998-2000) were identified from a Medicaid claims database. Presence of preexisting depression was determined on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. The patient cohort was followed up until they received their first prescription for an OHA (1998-2001); this date was treated as the index date for the study. Utilization patterns (ie, discontinuation, augmentation, switching, non-modification) for OHAs were computed for a 12-month follow-up period after the index date. A multivariate framework was used to estimate the impact of depression on utilization patterns, controlling for confounders such as demographics, comorbidity, provider interaction, drug regimen complexity, and DM severity. RESULTS: A total of 1237 newly diagnosed type 2 DM patients were identified (depressed, n=446; nondepressed, n=791). A higher number of depressed patients (23.32%) switched or augmented therapy compared with nondepressed patients (16.18%). Also, a higher fraction of depressed patients (39.46%) discontinued OHA therapy compared with nondepressed patients (32.87%). Results of a multinomial logistic regression indicated that, controlling for covariates, patients with depression were 1.72 times more likely to switch (P=0.046) and 1.89 times more likely to augment therapy (P=0.004) compared with nondepressed patients. Logistic regression analysis also indicated that, controlling for confounding covariates, patients with depression were 1.72 times more likely to modify initial OHA therapy compared with patients without depression (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Depression was significantly associated with utilization patterns of OHAs in these patients newly diagnosed with type 2 DM, thus possibly affecting their disease management.

Psychometric evaluation of the Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q), a novel measure to assess satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: The Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) is a new measure of patient satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the OPSAT-Q. METHODS: The OPSAT-Q contains 16 items in four subscales: Convenience, Confidence with Daily Activities, Side Effects, and Overall Satisfaction. All four subscale scores and an overall composite satisfaction score (CSS) can be computed. The OPSAT-Q, Osteoporosis Targeted Quality of Life (OPTQoL), and sociodemographic/clinical questionnaires, including 3 global items on convenience, functioning and side effects, were self-administered to women with osteoporosis or osteopenia recruited from four US clinics. Analyses included item and scale performance, internal consistency reliability, reproducibility, and construct validity. Reproducibility was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) via a follow-up questionnaire completed by participants 2 weeks post baseline. RESULTS: 104 women with a mean age of 65.1 years participated. The majority were Caucasian (64.4%), living with someone (74%), and not currently employed (58.7%). 73% had osteoporosis and 27% had osteopenia. 80% were taking weekly bisphosphonates and 18% were taking daily medication (2% missing data). On a scale of 0-100, individual patient subscale scores ranged from 17 to 100 and CSS scores ranged from 44 to 100. All scores showed acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70) (range 0.72 to 0.89). Reproducibility ranged from 0.62 (Daily Activities) to 0.79 (Side Effects) for the subscales; reproducibility for the CSS was 0.81. Significant correlations were found between the OPSAT-Q subscales and conceptually similar global measures (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings from this study confirm the validity and reliability of the OPSAT-Q and support the proposed composition of four subscales and a composite score. They also support the use of the OPSAT-Q to examine the impact of bisphosphonate dosing frequency on patient satisfaction.

The effect of depression on health care utilization and costs in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The objective of the study was to estimate the effect of depression on health care utilization and costs in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Patients were identified during a four-year enrollment period (1998-2001) from a Medicaid claims database. The final cohort consisted of 4,294 patients with type 2 diabetes (1,525 patients with depression; 2,769 patients without depression). Multivariate results indicated that significant utilization differences existed between the two groups: Patients who were depressed incurred a higher number of physician office visits, emergency room/inpatient admissions, and more prescriptions compared with patients who had diabetes but were not depressed. Patients with depression had nearly 65% higher overall health care costs than those without depression. Recognizing that depression is as a risk factor for increasing health care expenditures has the potential to improve diabetes management and related outcomes.

Cost and economic burden of adverse events associated with metastatic melanoma treatments in five countries.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate per-event cost and economic burden associated with managing the most common and/or severe metastatic melanoma (MM) treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in Australia, France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. METHODS: AEs associated with chemotherapy (dacarbazine, paclitaxel, fotemustine), immunotherapy (ipilimumab), and targeted therapy (vemurafenib) were identified by literature review. Medical resource use data associated with managing AEs were collected through two blinded Delphi panel cycles in each of the five countries. Published costs were used to estimate per-event costs and combined with AEs incidence, treatment usage, and MM prevalence to estimate the economic burden for each country. RESULTS: The costliest AEs were grade 3/4 events due to immunotherapy (Australia/France: colitis; UK: diarrhea) and chemotherapy (Germany/Italy: neutropenia/leukopenia). Treatment of AEs specific to chemotherapy (Australia/Germany/Italy/France: neutropenia/leukopenia) and targeted therapy (UK: squamous cell carcinoma) contributed heavily to country-specific economic burden. LIMITATIONS: Economic burden was estimated assuming that each patient experienced an AE only once. In addition, the context of settings was heterogeneous and the number of Delphi panel experts was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Management costs for MM treatment-associated AEs can be substantial. Results could be incorporated in economic models that support reimbursement dossiers. With the availability of newer treatments, establishment of a baseline measure of the economic burden of AEs will be crucial for assessing their impact on patients and regional healthcare systems.

Adjusting for treatment switching in the METRIC study shows further improved overall survival with trametinib compared with chemotherapy.

Trametinib, a selective inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) and MEK2, significantly improves progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive advanced or metastatic melanoma (MM). However, the pivotal clinical trial permitted randomized chemotherapy control group patients to switch to trametinib after disease progression, which confounded estimates of the overall survival (OS) advantage of trametinib. Our purpose was to estimate the switching-adjusted treatment effect of trametinib for OS and assess the suitability of each adjustment method in the primary efficacy population. Of the patients randomized to chemotherapy, 67.4% switched to trametinib. We applied the rank-preserving structural failure time model, inverse probability of censoring weights, and a two-stage accelerated failure time model to obtain estimates of the relative treatment effect adjusted for switching. The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis estimated a 28% reduction in the hazard of death with trametinib treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.98) for patients in the primary efficacy population (data cut May 20, 2013). Adjustment analyses deemed plausible provided OS HR point estimates ranging from 0.48 to 0.53. Similar reductions in the HR were estimated for the first-line metastatic subgroup. Treatment with trametinib, compared with chemotherapy, significantly reduced the risk of death and risk of disease progression in patients with BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive advanced melanoma or MM. Adjusting for switching resulted in lower HRs than those obtained from standard ITT analyses. However, CI are wide and results are sensitive to the assumptions associated with each adjustment method.

Use of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: evidence from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

BACKGROUND: The use of colonoscopy as a primary screening tool for colorectal cancer is gaining momentum owing to several studies suggesting superior effectiveness and the recent, favorable decision by Medicare to cover all routine screening colonoscopies. This study documents the use of colonoscopy versus other tests to screen for colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey were analyzed. Fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy done for any reason and for routine screening only were analyzed for those >/=50 years without previously diagnosed colorectal cancer (n = 12,505). RESULTS: The proportion of the total eligible population receiving any of the recommended tests for all possible reasons and for screening purposes only is 34.6% and 25.1%, respectively. For routine screening purposes, the test most commonly utilized was FOBT (55.6%) followed by colonoscopy (29.1%) and sigmoidoscopy (15.3%). When usage was assessed for all reasons, FOBT was still most commonly utilized (45.8%) followed by colonoscopy (38.7%) and sigmoidoscopy (15.5%). The elderly, non-White males and those with private insurance have a higher probability of receiving colonoscopy than FOBT. Several regional differences exist, including higher probability of undergoing sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy in the West. CONCLUSIONS: Only one fourth (upper limit one third) of the study population complied with colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Nearly one third of the routine screening tests done in 2000 were colonoscopies. This study provides baseline values that can be used to project future colonoscopy demand and identify potential supply barriers.

Surveillance patterns and polyp recurrence following diagnosis and excision of colorectal polyps in a medicare population.

OBJECTIVE: Study objectives were to determine surveillance and polyp recurrence rates among older, increased-risk patients who have been diagnosed and excised of colorectal polyps. The high incidence of colorectal cancers in the Medicare-eligible population, the strong evidence linking reductions in mortality from colorectal cancer by removal of colorectal polyps, and the paucity of postpolypectomy surveillance data in this population all supported the need for this study. METHODS: This retrospective study used Medicare claims data to identify a cohort of 19,895 beneficiaries ages >/=65 years diagnosed and excised of colorectal polyps in 1994. Survival analysis was used to compute surveillance and polyp recurrence rates over 5 years. Log-rank test was used for all statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Median time to first surveillance was 2.6 years. Surveillance rates for 1, 3, and 5 years were 17.6%, 55.8%, and 74.5%, respectively. Twenty-six percent had no surveillance event. Polyp recurrence rates for 1, 3, and 5 years were 10.9%, 38.2%, and 52.6%, respectively. Males and younger patients were more likely to undergo surveillance and showed higher polyp recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: The high likelihood of polyp recurrence underscores the need for continued efforts to promote awareness of and compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance. Efforts to increase surveillance rates among individuals diagnosed with colorectal polyps and making available additional treatment options that may prevent the recurrence of polyps and/or their possible progression to colorectal cancer should help make significant progress in reaching the Healthy People 2010 goal of reducing colorectal cancer deaths by 34% by the year 2010.

Evaluating the effect on patient outcomes of appropriate and inappropriate use of beta-blockers as secondary prevention after myocardial infarction in a medicaid population.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with high mortality in the United States. Beta-blockers have been shown to reduce mortality and reinfarction rates when used for long-term prevention after an AMI. However, this therapy is both underused and misused. The effect of this practice on outcomes needs to be investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect on patient outcomes (ie, fatality, health care utilization, and costs) of appropriate and inappropriate prescribing of beta-blocker therapy after AMI in a Medicaid population aged <65 years. METHODS: Data for 1 year before and after AMI were extracted from West Virginia Medicaid claims from January 1, 1996, to June 30, 2001. Information was obtained regarding prescriptions for beta-blockers for these patients within 90 days after discharge. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who were prescribed therapy appropriately and those who were prescribed therapy inappropriately (underuse or misuse). Fatality rates during 1 year after discharge were compared using chi-square analysis. The study used regression analysis to model health care utilization and costs as a function of appropriately/inappropriately prescribed groups. RESULTS: Data were assessed for 488 eligible patients (mean [SD] age, 53.70 [8.14] years; 246 men [50.4%], 242 women [49.6%]). Overall, 309 patients (63.3%) had appropriate prescribing of beta-blockers; at the end of 1 year, these patients had a significantly lower all-cause death rate compared with those who were prescribed therapy inappropriately (P = 0.030). Although the cardiac death rate was slightly lower for the appropriate group, the difference was not statistically significant. The appropriately prescribed group had significantly higher health care utilization in the follow-up period (P < 0.050 for hospital visits, emergency department visits, and length of stay). These groups demonstrated differences in a few variables at baseline (age, presence of absolute contraindications, presence of hypertension, number of noncardiac admissions before AMI, and use of beta-blockers before AMI: all, P < 0.050), implying different severity levels. Patient health status at the time of the incident AMI had a confounding effect on health care utilization, and there were indications that the appropriate group had greater severity compared with the inappropriate group. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate prescribing of beta-blockers for secondary prevention after an AMI was associated with better survival in this population. However, the effects of inappropriate and appropriate beta-blocker prescribing on health care utilization need to be evaluated prospectively so that all severity indicators can be properly adjusted.