Colonic epithelial cell diversity in health and inflammatory bowel disease.

The colonic epithelium facilitates host-microorganism interactions to control mucosal immunity, coordinate nutrient recycling and form a mucus barrier. Breakdown of the epithelial barrier underpins inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the specific contributions of each epithelial-cell subtype to this process are unknown. Here we profile single colonic epithelial cells from patients with IBD and unaffected controls. We identify previously unknown cellular subtypes, including gradients of progenitor cells, colonocytes and goblet cells within intestinal crypts. At the top of the crypts, we find a previously unknown absorptive cell, expressing the proton channel OTOP2 and the satiety peptide uroguanylin, that senses pH and is dysregulated in inflammation and cancer. In IBD, we observe a positional remodelling of goblet cells that coincides with downregulation of WFDC2-an antiprotease molecule that we find to be expressed by goblet cells and that inhibits bacterial growth. In vivo, WFDC2 preserves the integrity of tight junctions between epithelial cells and prevents invasion by commensal bacteria and mucosal inflammation. We delineate markers and transcriptional states, identify a colonic epithelial cell and uncover fundamental determinants of barrier breakdown in IBD.

Accessing care during the pandemic: A UK wide survey of people with rheumatoid arthritis and adult juvenile inflammatory arthritis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 drastically changed healthcare delivery models for rheumatology services. We sought to understand the impact of these changes for patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and adult Juvenile Inflammatory Arthritis (AJIA) in established patients and those newly diagnosed during the pandemic. RESULTS: Of the 316 participants, a significant proportion regularly used analgesics (45.4%, n = 119), corticosteroids (17.9%, n = 47) and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs [(NSAIDs) (36.6%, n = 96)]. Two thirds of participants (66.5%, n = 210) did not know their Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28). Of the remaining third, moderate disease activity (12%, n = 38) was most reported. We found that 16.8% (n = 53) felt their condition was managed well during the pandemic. The remainder felt more negatively. For the newly diagnosed cohort, 34.5% (n = 10) delayed seeking GP help because of COVID-19 concerns. Once assessed, a quarter (24.1%, n = 7) were referred to rheumatology after 4 or more consultations. We found 47% (n = 77) expressed positive opinions on remote consultations, whereas 36% (n = 59) had concerns. The lack of clinical examination (42.5%, n = 25) was flagged. Changing the dynamic from health worker to a patient centred approach was the most wished for improvement (20.3%, n = 64). CONCLUSIONS: Most participants did not know their disease activity status, which is of concern. With a push towards patient-centred and patient-led care, education and supported self-management is critically important. There is high use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids. Pathways of care underwent change with subsequent delays in specialist assessment. The introduction of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) and virtual consultations further distances healthcare professionals from patients and could affect outcomes.