A Review About the Assessment of the Bleeding and Thrombosis Risk for Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Scheduled for Surgery.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) present a unique challenge in surgical management due to their inherent predisposition to both bleeding and thrombosis. MPNs are a heterogenous group of acquired clonal conditions. The three classic MPNs are essential thrombocythemia (ET), myelofibrosis (PMF), and polycythemia vera (PV). All subtypes of MPN are associated with both thrombotic and bleeding complications. There are four risk categories for thrombosis in MPN patients: age, thrombosis history, and JAK-2 mutation. They are further classified as very low, low, intermediate, and high risk. The genetic landscape of MPN is fascinating and complex like all myeloid disorders. Bleeding risk can be assessed through leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS), and a previous history of bleeding in a patient. Risk assessment and perioperative management are important aspects of improving the quality of life and preventing complications in surgeries. Preoperative management includes a risk assessment of venous thromboembolism, use of appropriate pharmacological treatment, platelet count control, and correction and cardiovascular risk factors. This review summarizes the assessment of bleeding and thrombosis risk for patients with MPNs scheduled for surgery. Furthermore, this review discusses various tools that can be used to identify MPN patients at risk of thrombosis prior to surgery.

Immune Evasion Through Human Leukocyte Antigen Implications and Its Impact on Targeted Therapy.

The malfunctioning of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I antigens has a substantial negative impact on the effectiveness of leukemia treatment, particularly in the development of immunotherapies that rely on T-cell activation. HLA-G, a molecule that suppresses the immune response, plays a role in repressing the activation and proliferation of T cells, natural killer cells, and antigen-presenting cells. The expression of HLA-G is associated with various pathological conditions. Tumor cells exploit the immune evasion capabilities of HLA, allowing them to evade detection and elimination by the immune system. Understanding and modifying the HLA molecules is crucial for the advancement of innovative immunotherapies targeting chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Numerous mechanisms have been investigated to elucidate how HLA facilitates tumor evasion in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other malignancies. These mechanisms include inhibiting immune cell cytolysis, altering cytokine production levels, promoting immune cell programmed cell death, and impairing chemotaxis. This review provides a comprehensive overview of immune evasion mediated by HLA and its implications for targeted therapy.

MMP1, MMP9, MMP11 and MMP13 in melanoma and its metastasis - key points in understanding the mechanisms and celerity of tumor dissemination.

BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)1, MMP9, MMP11, and MMP13 are overexpressed in malignant melanoma (MM), being associated with tumor invasive phase, metastases, and more aggressive neoplastic phenotypes. AIM: The main objective of the current study was to correlate the expression of the MMPs with the evolution of MM toward distant metastasis. PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study, including 13 patients with metastatic MM. Data concerning age, sex, localization of the primary lesion and metastasis, and histological and immunohistochemical features (intensity of expression and percent of positive cells for MMPs) were statistically processed. RESULTS: The time between the diagnosis of primitive melanoma and the diagnosis of metastasis ranged between 0 and 73 months, with a mean value of 18.3 months. The metastases rich in MMP1- and MMP9-positive cells occurred earlier than the metastases with low levels of positive cells. The mean period until metastasis was shorter for the MMP1-expressing tumors than the ones without MMP1 expression. MMP13 expression in the tumor and its metastasis was significantly linked with the time until the metastasis occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the roles of MMP1, MMP9, and MMP13 in the process of metastasis in melanoma and the opportunity to use them as therapeutic targets and surveillance molecules.

Variations in the expression of TIMP1, TIMP2 and TIMP3 in cutaneous melanoma with regression and their possible function as prognostic predictors.

Regression in melanoma is a frequent biological event of uncertain prognostic value as the lesion exhibits heterogeneous phenotypical features, both at the morphological and immunohistochemical level. In the present study, we examined the expression of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP1, TIMP2 and TIMP3) in melanoma with regression. We specifically examined the expression levels of these TIMPs in regressed components (RC) and non-regressed components (NRC) of the tumor and compared their expression levels with those in non-regressed melanomas. We found that TIMP1 was overexpressed in the NRC of melanomas with partial regression (PR) compared with the NRC in melanomas with segmental regression (SR) (P=0.011). TIMP2 was overexpressed in the NRC of melanomas with PR compared with the NRC in melanomas with SR (PR/SR, P=0.009); or compared with the NRC in melanomas with simultaneous SR-PR (P=0.002); or compared with melanomas without regression (absence of regression) (P=0.037). Moreover, TIMP3 was overexpressed in the NRC of all melanomas with SR as compared to the RC component (P=0.007). Our findings on the differential expression of TIMP1, TIMP2 and TIMP3 in melanomas with regression support the hypothesis that the morphological differences identified in the melanoma regression spectrum may have a correlation with prognosis. This may explain the controversial findings within the literature concerning the biological and prognostic role of regression in melanoma.