New developments in clinical oncology: the interdependence of bench and bedside.

Efforts to diminish the overall morbidity and mortality of malignancy have required a variety of strategies and a balanced national research agenda. The design of curative regimens against leukemia, lymphomas, testis cancer, and childhood malignancies is a tribute to the interactions between laboratory and clinical scientists. Laboratory models illustrated the importance of dose and the need for combinations to avoid the emergence of drug resistance in heterogeneous tumors. In addressing the incurability of common epithelial cancers in adults once disseminated, again laboratory models suggested that regimens which produced responses in advanced disease might be curative in patients with micro-metastases. Such proved to be the case in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer involving lymph nodes and for osteogenic sarcoma. Recent studies have extended this strategy to less advanced breast cancer and to locally advanced colon cancer. Lung cancer has required a different strategy. A coalition has developed to support the strongest possible public position against smoking. For the first time lung cancer incidence has leveled off in white males. Women and minorities continue to be a major target for smoking cessation programs. While large randomized trials are expensive (and to some scientists, unexciting), they are our most reliable means of detecting treatment differences of 10 to 15%. Because lung, breast, and colon cancer kill almost 250,000 Americans each year, such "small" differences represent thousands of Americans. There are also a number of interesting current studies that may impact in the longer term on the care of patients with cancer. Research of three different groups of investigators has recently converged. Over the past 3 decades several groups of basic laboratory investigators had been studying and cloning hematopoietic growth factors. Large randomized trials now confirm that myelosuppression after intensive chemotherapy can be substantially ameliorated, reducing infections and decreasing hospital days, risks, and costs. Another cohort of clinical pharmacologists and clinicians were studying bone marrow transplantation, developing combinations of agents that can be given at high dose to overcome resistance, albeit with considerable toxicity. Other groups in blood banks and those interested in the regulation of hematopoiesis recognized that early hematopoietic progenitor cells circulate in the peripheral blood. Their number were increased after certain chemotherapy regimens, by growth factors and most remarkably, with growth factors given after chemotherapy. Patients supported with peripheral blood progenitor cells reengraft both platelets and granulocytes more rapidly than those given marrow, in the time frame of recovery after standard doses of chemotherapy (i.e., 21 days).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Serotherapy of a patient with a monoclonal antibody directed against a human lymphoma-associated antigen.

A preliminary serotherapeutic trial was undertaken with a monoclonal antibody designated antibody 89 (Ab 89) directed against a lymphoma-associated antigen. In vitro studies demonstrated that Ab 89 could mediate complement-dependent lysis and macrophage adherence but not antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. To evaluate toxicity and therapeutic efficacy, two courses of Ab 89 were administered to a patient with an Ab 89-reactive tumor. Transient decreases in the number of circulating tumor cells and the appearance of circulating dead cells were noted with the infusion of Ab 89. Following administration of 150 mg or more of Ab 89, small amounts of antibody could be demonstrated on circulating tumor cells at a time when no free antibody was found in the serum. The inability to deliver a significant amount of Ab 89 to tumor cells in vivo is thought to be secondary to a circulating tumor antigen. Following each infusion, the amount of this blocking antigen decreased but could not be entirely cleared from the serum. This study provides preliminary evidence for the lack of clinical toxicity of a monoclonal antibody and identifies circulating blocking antigens as a significant obstacle to serotherapy.

Randomized trials of high dose chemotherapy for breast cancer.

'Now is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning'Winston Churchill in a speech to the Canadian Senate and House of Commons, December 30, 1941. In laboratory models of cancer, dose of cytotoxic chemotherapy correlates with curative therapy, while cumulative dose is associated with longer survival for those who are not cured. These observations suggests a strategy of using high doses when cure is the objective but smaller doses over a prolonged period when palliation and survival are the goal. A strategy combining repetitive cycles of higher doses of cytotoxic therapy, followed by the optimal combination of hormonal and biological agents based on the tumor's receptors might contribute to both the highest possible cure rate and the longest survival. The development of bone marrow transplant (BMT) for leukemias, and its subsequent modification for support after high dose therapy for other malignancies, has a long, complex and emotional history in medicine. At least partly because of firmly held opinions and the way large randomized trials are funded in the United States, few American randomized trials of BMT or high dose therapy strategies have been completed. The vast majority of published randomized BMT and high dose studies are European. Interestingly, in contrast, two large American randomized trials of high dose chemotherapy for breast cancer had actually completed accrual. Accrual on a third was on target until the presentation of five very small or very early randomized trials at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in May of 1999. Results from some of these trials, which were analyzed after a relatively brief follow-up, are too premature to allow definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, these data have been over and misinterpreted within the scientific and lay communities. The remaining studies included a limited number of patients, thus restricting the statistical power of the observations. The desire for quick answers impeded dispassionate analysis of the available data. The opportunity for collegial review of the data further deteriorated with another round of press coverage when the data from the South African adjuvant study were found to be unreliable. Rather than increasing commitment to accrual on randomized and appropriate pilot trials, accrual to the only large American study in existence at that time trickled to a halt. In response to press coverage, Susan Edmonds from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center observed that 'the NYT article tends to cast shadows generally on the therapy and those providing the therapy rather than pointing out early in the article (where the public will readily see it) that there are a number of very credible research institutions conducting research directed at breast cancer, some looking at high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.' Dr. Rodenhuis, presenting the large positive Dutch Randomized study (funded by the Dutch insurance industry) at ASCO in 2000, commented on the 'unreasonably high expectations until 1999' and 'unreasonably negative [opinion-ed] since 1999' for high dose adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Malignant mesothelioma following treatment for Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: Asbestos exposure is the major known risk factor for mesothelioma, but several case reports have suggested a link between radiation therapy and subsequent development of malignant mesothelioma. This report explores a possible association between radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease and mesothelioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four cases of malignant mesothelioma were observed following Hodgkin's disease at the Mesothelioma Clinic of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. A fifth such patient was found after a review of the literature. RESULTS: In all five cases, the mesothelioma arose in the field of prior radiotherapy. No history of asbestos exposure was elicited by careful questioning or by review of chest radiographs. Examination of lung tissue in one patient showed 250 ferruginous bodies per gram of lung tissue, consistent with no significant prior exposure. The mean interval between radiation treatment for Hodgkin's disease and development of mesothelioma was 15 years, which emphasizes the need for continued follow-up and evaluation of these patients and supports a causal relationship. CONCLUSION: Mesothelioma may need to be added to the list of second malignancies that arise following radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease. Further support is given to a causal link between radiation exposure and mesothelioma.

Response to ifosfamide and mesna: 124 previously treated patients with metastatic or unresectable sarcoma.

European and American investigators have reported response rates of 38% to 83% for ifosfamide alone in pretreated sarcomas. In a phase II trial of ifosfamide 2.0g/m2 days 1 to 4 with mesna uroprotection in 124 patients with previously failed sarcomas, four (3%) responded completely (95% exact confidence interval, 1% to 8%) and 26 (21%) had a complete or partial response (95% exact confidence interval, 14% to 29%). The median time to progression was 5 and 9 months for partial and complete responders, respectively. In the subset of soft tissue sarcomas, the response rate for the patients receiving bolus administration was 26%, compared with 9% for the patients receiving a continuous infusion schedule (P = .03). The response rates among patients with soft tissue and bony sarcomas with a performance score of 0-2 and 0-1 prior to chemotherapy administration were 20% and 40%, respectively. Somnolence or confusion developed in 19%. Neurotoxicity was significantly associated with poor performance status (P less than .01), elevated creatinine (P less than .01), and low bicarbonate levels (P = .05). A serum bicarbonate less than 20 developed in 31% of the patients and was significantly associated with older age (P = .01), elevated creatinine (P = .02), and female sex (P = .06). Hematuria was significantly associated with no uroprotection (the first four patients did not receive mesna because it was unavailable), but was not associated with prior cyclophosphamide, pelvic radiotherapy, age, or bolus v continuation infusion schedule. Thus, ifosfamide is active in failed sarcomas and warrants further study in previously untreated patients with sarcoma.

Ciprofloxacin versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for prophylaxis of bacterial infections in bone marrow transplant recipients: a randomized, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (CIP) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMS) for the prevention of bacterial infections in patients who received bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for the treatment of solid and hematopoietic neoplasms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult inpatients about to undergo BMT for lymphoma, leukemia, or solid tumors were enrolled onto a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial that compared CIP (750 mg orally twice per day) with TMS (160 mg trimethoprim and 800 mg sulfamethoxazole orally twice per day). Subjects were stratified before randomization according to tumor and BMT type. Prophylaxis was begun within 96 hours of initiation of the BMT preparative regimen and continued until the onset of fever, signs or symptoms of infection, serious adverse effects, or recovery of the absolute granulocyte count (AGC) to > or = to 400/microL. RESULTS: Seventy-five CIP recipients and 71 TMS recipients were assessable for efficacy. No difference was noted between the two groups in occurrence of fever during neutropenia, time to onset of first fever, or overall infection rates. Ten bacteremias occurred in CIP recipients versus six in TMS recipients (P = .43). Ten episodes of Clostridium difficile enterocolitis occurred in TMS recipients versus no episodes in CIP recipients (P = .001). Four infections caused by gram-negative bacilli, including one bacteremia, occurred in TMS recipients versus none in CIP recipients (P = .06). No differences were noted in the incidence of rash or organ toxicity. TMS recipients had longer durations of granulocytopenia at AGC levels < or = to 500/microL and < or = to 100/microL than did CIP recipients (P = .08 for both comparisons). Mean peak and trough serum levels of CIP decreased significantly between weeks 1 and 2 of prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: CIP and TMS were equally safe and effective in the prevention of bacterial infections in BMT patients when the overall infection rate was used as the principal end point. TMS prophylaxis was associated with a higher incidence of C difficile enterocolitis and infections caused by gram-negative bacilli, as well as a trend toward prolongation of granulocytopenia.

Response to mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine in 108 patients with metastatic or unresectable sarcoma and no prior chemotherapy.

In this phase II trial, 105 eligible patients with no prior chemotherapy and advanced sarcoma received doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine (DTIC) with mesna uroprotection (MAID). Starting doses of these drugs were 60, 7,500, and 900 mg/m2 divided over 72 hours by continuous infusion, respectively. Mesna was given for 84 to 96 hours at 2,500 mg/m2/d. Myelosuppression was dose limiting, causing the only toxic death (sepsis). Nonhematologic toxicity consisted predominantly of anorexia and vomiting. Severe mucositis, macroscopic hematuria, renal tubular acidosis, renal failure, and CNS toxicity occurred in less than 5% of cycles. No cardiotoxicity was detected. The overall response rate (10% complete response [CR]) was 47% (95% confidence intervals, 5% to 18% and 37% to 57%, respectively). Most responses (approximately 70%) were observed within two cycles. Median times to progression were 10 and 9 months, respectively. Histologic high tumor grade, lesions less than 5 cm, and less than 1 year from diagnosis to study entry correlated with the probability of response. The median survival was 16 months. Time from diagnosis to study entry, performance status, and extent of disease, but not histologic grade, correlated with survival. Following CR, two patients remain disease-free at 32 and 16 months. Of the 15 additional patients rendered disease-free with surgery, two remain disease-free at 30 and 18 months with no further therapy. While most relapses occurred in sites of prior involvement, death from CNS metastases occurred in 11 of the 80 patients with high-grade sarcomas, of whom seven were still responding systematically (three complete responders). Because of its substantial response in this phase II trial, the MAID regimen is being compared with doxorubicin and DTIC alone in advanced sarcomas and to observation in the adjuvant treatment of high-grade sarcomas in randomized trials.

Peritoneal mesothelioma: natural history and response to chemotherapy.

Twenty-three patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma seen at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and the University of Maryland Cancer Center from 1968 to 1982 were studied to assess the natural history of the disease and the efficacy of current treatment. Asbestos exposure was reported by 57%. Of 18 patients receiving a doxorubicin-containing regimen, 14 had measurable or evaluable disease. One complete response, four partial responses and one regression (in a patient with evaluable but not measurable disease) were observed, ranging in duration from 6 to 36 months. A single patient remains disease free for more than 36 months after subsequent radiotherapy. Significant clotting abnormalities (including disseminated intravascular coagulation, massive thrombosis, fatal pulmonary emboli, Coombs-positive hemolytic anemia, and phlebitis) occurred in 22% of the patients. Trends toward decreased survival were observed for smokers, patients presenting with ascites, and those with stage II-IV disease.

Decision analysis of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients.

PURPOSE: Young Ashkenazi Jewish women or those from high-risk families who test positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutant genes have a significant risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer by the age of 70 years. Many question whether they should have prophylactic surgical procedures, ie, bilateral mastectomy and/or oophorectomy. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to determine the survival, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic surgical procedures. The probabilities of developing breast and ovarian cancer were based on literature review among women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene and mortality rates were determined from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data for 1973 to 1992. The costs for hospital and ambulatory care were estimated from Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) payments in 1995, supplemented by managed care and fee-for-service data. Utility measures for quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were explicitly determined using the time-trade off method. Estimated risks for breast and ovarian cancer after prophylactic surgeries were obtained from the literature. RESULTS: For a 30-year-old woman, according to her cancer risks, prophylactic oophorectomy improved survival by 0.4 to 2.6 years; mastectomy, by 2.8 to 3.4 years; and mastectomy and oophorectomy, by 3.3 to 6.0 years over surveillance. The QALYs saved were 0.5 for oophorectomy and 1.9 for the combined procedures in the high-risk model. Prophylactic surgeries were cost-effective compared with surveillance for years of life saved, but not for QALYs. CONCLUSION: Among women who test positive for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation, prophylactic surgery at a young age substantially improves survival, but unless genetic risk of cancer is high, provides no benefit for quality of life. Prophylactic surgery is cost-effective for years of life saved compared with other medical interventions that are deemed cost-effective.

Benefits and costs of screening Ashkenazi Jewish women for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

PURPOSE: To determine the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening Ashkenazi Jewish women for three specific BRCA1/2 gene mutations. METHODS: We used a Markov model and Monte Carlo analysis to estimate the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of screening for three specific mutations in a population in which their prevalence is 2.5% and the associated cancer risks are 56% for breast cancer and 16% for ovarian cancer. We assumed that the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 98% and 99%, respectively, that bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy would reduce ovarian cancer risk by 45%, and that bilateral prophylactic mastectomy would reduce breast cancer risk by 90%. We used Medicare payment data for treatment costs and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for cancer survival. RESULTS: Our model suggests that genetic screening of this population could prolong average nondiscounted survival by 38 days (95% probability interval, 22 to 57 days) for combined surgery, 33 days (95% probability interval, 18 to 43 days) for mastectomy, 11 days (95% probability interval, 4 to 25 days) for oophorectomy, and 6 days (95% probability interval, 3 to 8 days) for surveillance. The respective cost-effectiveness ratios per life-year saved, with a discount rate of 3%, are $20,717, $29,970, $72,780, and $134,273. CONCLUSION: In this Ashkenazi Jewish population, with a high prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations, genetic screening may significantly increase average survival and, depending on costs and screening/treatment strategies, may be cost-effective by the standards of accepted cancer screening tests. According to our model, screening is cost-effective only if all women who test positive undergo prophylactic surgery. These estimates require confirmation through prospective observational studies and clinical trials.

High-dose ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection: a phase I study.

Phase II trials of ifosfamide have been performed with standard doses of 5 to 8 g/m2/course. In this phase I study, 29 patients were treated with a 4-day continuous infusion ifosfamide to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the nonhematologic dose-limiting toxicity. Autologous bone marrow support was to have been used for the subsequent dose level if granulocytes were more than 500/microL for more than 14 days in two of two to five patients at a given dose level. Doses were escalated from 8 to 18 g/m2 ifosfamide. Mesna was given at an equivalent dose by continuous infusion for 5 days. At the 18 g/m2 dose level, dose-limiting renal insufficiency and a median of 11 days (range, 8 to 18 days) of granulocytopenia (less than 500/microL) were observed. Thus, autologous bone marrow reinfusion ws not used. The duration of myelosuppression, the frequency and severity of mucositis, and renal tubular acidosis were all dose-dependent. Mild to moderate CNS toxicity also appeared to be related to dose; however, severe CNS toxicity (transient confusion, hallucinations, and somnolence) was observed sporadically at both low- and high-dose levels. Transient hematuria (greater than 50 red blood cells [RBCs]/high power field) occurred once but did not affect treatment. There were nine responses (two complete) in 27 heavily pretreated assessable patients including seven responses in 20 patients with advanced refractory sarcoma. Ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection can undergo considerable dose escalation over the usual prescribed doses before nonhematologic dose-limiting toxicity is encountered. Ifosfamide has broad cytotoxicity against solid tumors and may prove to be an important addition to high-dose combination chemotherapy regimens.

Node status has prognostic significance in the multimodality therapy of diffuse, malignant mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: We studied a multimodality approach using extrapleural pneumonectomy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1980 to 1992, 52 selected patients, underwent treatment. Median age was 53 years (range, 33 to 69). Initial patient evaluation was performed by a multimodality team. Pathologic diagnosis was reviewed and confirmed before therapy. Patients with no medical contraindication and potentially resectable mesothelioma on computed tomography (CT) (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] when it became available) received extrapleural pneumonectomy, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP) chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. RESULTS: Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 17% and 5.8%, respectively. The overall median survival duration is 16 months (range, 1 month to 8 years). The 32 patients with epithelial histologic variant had 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 77%, 50%, and 42%, respectively. Patients with mixed and sarcomatous cell disease had 1- and 2-year survival rates of 45% and 7.5%; no patient lived longer than 25 months (P < .01). At resection, positive regional mediastinal lymph nodes were found in 13. Positive lymph nodes were associated with poorer survival than were negative nodes (P < .01). Patients with epithelial variant and negative mediastinal lymph nodes had a survival rate of 45% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Multimodality therapy including extrapleural pneumonectomy has acceptable morbidity and mortality for selected patients. Prolonged survival occurred in patients with epithelial histologic variant and negative mediastinal lymph nodes. These data provide a rationale for a revised staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma; furthermore, they permit stratification of patients into groups likely to benefit from aggressive multimodality treatment.

Trimetrexate in malignant mesothelioma: A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Phase II study.

PURPOSE: Folic acid antagonists are reported to have activity against mesothelioma. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) undertook this phase II study of the new antifolate, trimetrexate (TMTX), to evaluate its response rate and toxicity in chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant mesothelioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients were accrued to this protocol. Because of concerns about TMTX toxicity in patients with malignant effusions and/or hypoalbuminemia, the first 17 patients were treated at a dose of 6 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 21 days. Because minimal toxicity was observed, the subsequent 35 patients were treated at a dose of 10 mg/m2. RESULTS: Two of 17 patients (12%) in the 6-mg/m2 treatment group had a partial response (PR) and four of 34 eligible patients (12%) in the 10-mg/m2 treatment group had a PR or regression (R) of assessable disease. No patient achieved a complete response (CR). Median survival durations were 5.0 and 8.9 months in the 6- and 10-mg/m2 treatment groups, respectively, while the 2-year survival rates were identical at 18%. At the 10-mg/m2 dose, toxicity was tolerable, with one toxic death from sepsis and a 12% rate of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia. CONCLUSION: In this large trial, TMTX showed minor activity in the treatment of malignant mesothelioma. Myelosuppression was mild and dose-related. Future studies of higher doses of TMTX should be considered.

Malignant mesothelioma following radiation exposure.

Mesothelioma developed in proximity to the field of therapeutic radiation administered 10-31 years previously in four patients. In three, mesothelioma arose within the site of prior therapeutic radiation for another cancer. Mesothelioma in the fourth patient developed adjacent to the site of cosmetic radiation to a thyroidectomy scar. None of these four patients recalled an asbestos exposure or had evidence of asbestosis on chest roentgenogram. Lung tissue in one patient was negative for ferruginous bodies, a finding considered to indicate no significant asbestos exposure. Five other patients with radiation-associated mesothelioma have been reported previously, suggesting that radiation is an uncommon cause of human mesothelioma. Problems in the diagnosis of radiation-associated mesotheliomas are considered.

Dose-intensive therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: long-term outcome.

PURPOSE: To determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall long-term survival for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients aged 60 years or younger who respond to first-line chemotherapy followed by high-dose combination alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide 5,625 mg/m(2), cisplatin 165 mg/m(2), and carmustine 480 mg/m(2)) with hematologic stem-cell support and chest and prophylactic cranial radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were selected on the basis of their continued response to first-line therapy, their relative lack of significant comorbidity, and their ability to obtain financial clearance. RESULTS: Of 36 patients with stage III SCLC, nine patients (25%) had achieved a complete response (CR), 20 had achieved a near-CR, and seven had achieved a partial response before undergoing high-dose therapy. Toxicity included three deaths (8%). For all patients, the median PFS was 21 months. The 2- and 5-year survival rates after dose intensification were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39% to 72%), and 41% (95% CI, 28% to 61%). Of the 29 patients who were in or near CR before undergoing high-dose therapy, 14 remain continuously progression-free a median of 61 months (range, 40 to 139 months) after high-dose therapy. Actuarial 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 57% (95% CI, 41% to 79%) and 53% (95% CI, 38% to 76%). By multivariate analysis, short intensive induction chemotherapy was associated with favorable outcome (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Use of high-dose systemic therapy with intensive local-regional radiotherapy was associated with manageable treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Patients who were in or near CR before intensification are enjoying an unmaintained 5-year PFS rate of 53%. Late complications were infrequent, and most patients returned to full-time work and activity. A randomized comparison of this approach and conventional-dose therapy should define the use of dose intensification with hematopoietic support in patients with responding limited-stage SCLC.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America.

PURPOSE: To identify trends in high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support (autotransplants) for breast cancer (1989 to 1995). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of patients who received autotransplants and were reported to the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry. Between January 1, 1989 and June 30, 1995, 19,291 autotransplants were reviewed; 5,886 were for breast cancer. Main outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and survival. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1995, autotransplants for breast cancer increased sixfold. After 1992, breast cancer was the most common indication for autotransplant. Significant trends included increasing use for locally advanced rather than metastatic disease (P < .00001) and use of blood-derived rather than marrow-derived stem cells (P < .00001). One-hundred-day mortality decreased from 22% to 5% (P < .0001). Three-year PFS probabilities were 65% (95% confidence intervals [Cls], 59 to 71) for stage 2 disease, and 60% (95% Cl, 53 to 67) for stage 3 disease. In metastatic breast cancer, 3-year probabilities of PFS were 7% (95% Cl, 4 to 10) for women with no response to conventional dose chemotherapy; 13% (95% Cl, 9 to 17) for those with partial response; and 32% (95% Cl, 27 to 37) for those with complete response. Eleven percent of women with stage 2/3 disease and less than 1% of those with stage 4 disease participated in national cooperative group randomized trials. CONCLUSION: Autotransplants increasingly are used to treat breast cancer. One-hundred-day mortality has decreased substantially. Three-year survival is better in women with earlier stage disease and in those who respond to pretransplant chemotherapy.

Dose escalation of the hypoxic cell sensitizer etanidazole combined with ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support.

Multiple mechanisms of drug resistance contribute to treatment failure. Although high-dose therapy attempts to overwhelm these defenses pharmacologically, this approach is only successful in a fraction of treated patients. Many drug resistance mechanisms are shared between malignant and normal cells, but the expression of various drug resistance mechanisms associated with hypoxia is largely confined to tumor tissue. Thus, reversal of this mechanism is likely to provide a therapeutic advantage to the host. This study was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of etanidazole when it is given concurrently with high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE), with hematopoietic stem cell support. The maximum tolerated doses of high-dose ICE were administered concurrently with dose escalations of etanidazole, a hypoxic cell sensitizer. All agents were given by 96-h continuous i.v. infusion beginning on day -7. Mesna uroprotection was provided. Autologous marrow and cytokine mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells were reinfused on day 0. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered following reinfusion until the granulocytes recovered to > 1000/microliter. Fifty-five adults with advanced malignancies were enrolled in cohorts of five to nine patients. Four dose levels of etanidazole between 3 and 5.5 g/m2/day (12, 16, 20, and 22 g/m2 total doses) and two doses of carboplatin (1600 and 1800 mg/m2 total doses) were evaluated. Seven patients died of organ toxicity (13%); two each from veno-occlusive disease of liver and sepsis; and one each from sudden death, renal failure, and refractory thrombocytopenic hemorrhage. Five deaths occurred at the top dose level. One additional patient suffered a witnessed cardiorespiratory arrest from ventricular fibrillation and was resuscitated. Dose-dependent and largely reversible peripheral neuropathy was observed consisting of two syndromes: severe cramping myalgic/neuralgic pain, predominantly in stocking glove distribution, occurring between day -3 and day 0, and a sensory peripheral neuropathy with similar distribution peaking around day +60. The maximal achievable dose of etanidazole (16 g/m2 dose level) resulted in a mean serum level of 38 micrograms/ml (25-55 micrograms/ml). Etanidazole significantly enhanced host toxicity of high-dose ICE. Effective modulatory doses of etanidazole could not be given with acceptable toxicity using this schedule.

Cost-effectiveness and reimbursement in patient care.

The recent collapse of the previously effective coalition of the federal government, universities and medical schools, the pharmaceutical industry, and third-party payers has resulted in the current crisis in funding of clinical trials. The reduced financial support for clinical research comes at a time when a number of new investigational therapies offer the promise of better medical care for patients with life-threatening diseases. Controversy exists regarding the role of physicians in encouraging federal support for clinical research and third-party reimbursement for patient care for patients on clinical trials. Some believe the physician should take an activist role on the issues in general, while others believe that the physician should focus on protecting the interests of individual patients by acting as the patient's agent. Many difficult choices lie ahead for society as a whole in determining what percentage of its health-care budget will be allocated for clinical research, who will pay for patient-care costs of patients in clinical trials, and how this relatively limited resource should be distributed among the population at large. Case-management programs are one attempt to monitor and control health-care costs, but in many instances case management has been used to determine if patients are enrolled in clinical research trials and to disallow coverage for other than standard patient care.

Asbestos-related malignancy.

Due to the known association with asbestos exposure, malignant mesothelioma has assumed an importance out of proportion to its incidence in the American population (2.2 per million). Patients present with chest pain, shortness of breath, or both. The initial chest X-ray generally reveals a large unilateral pleural effusion. A large piece of tissue obtained via open biopsy is usually required for histologic diagnosis. Investigational approaches include multiple needle biopsies obtained for electron microscopy, as well as for immunoperoxidase staining for keratin and CEA. The tumor characteristically remains localized until late in its course. The treatment of mesothelioma remains unsatisfactory. However, anecdotes report long-term disease-free survival after intensive treatment. Palliation with a response rate of up to 30% to various chemotherapeutic regimens has been reported by a number of investigators.

GM-CSF in marrow transplantation.

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is being increasingly used in a wide variety of diseases. During the period of re-engraftment the patient is particularly susceptible to a number of opportunistic infections which can radically affect acute morbidity and mortality. Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) has been shown to mobilise haemopoietic progenitor cells for use after high-dose therapy, to enhance myeloid engraftment and stimulate mature monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils. Evidence is emerging that GM-CSF may be useful in BMT. A review of clinical trials in patients receiving BMT has revealed that the administration of rhGM-CSF significantly reduces the duration to re-engraftment, number of antibiotic treatment days, and the period of hospitalisation. Thus, rhGM-CSF appears to be a useful adjunct to BMT.