RESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: To maximize utility and prevent premature liver transplantation (LT), a delayed LT strategy (DS) was adopted in France in 2015 in patients listed for any single HCC treated with resection or thermal ablation during the waiting phase. The DS involves postponing LT until recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the DS to make sure that it did not hamper pre- and post-LT outcomes. METHODS: Patients listed for HCC in France between 2015 and 2018 were studied. After data extraction from the national LT database, 2,025 patients were identified and classified according to six groups: single tumor entering DS, single tumor not entering DS, multiple tumors, no curative treatment, untreatable HCC or T1 tumors. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 18-month risk of dropout for death, too sick to be transplanted or tumor progression before LT, 5-year post-LT HCC recurrence and post-LT survival rates were compared. RESULTS: Median waiting-time in the DS group was 910 days. Pre-LT dropout probability was significantly lower in the DS group compared to other groups (13% vs. 19%, p = 0.0043) and significantly higher in the T1 group (25.4%, p = 0.05). Post-LT HCC recurrence rate in the multiple nodules group was significantly higher (19.6%, p = 0.019), while 5-year post-LT survival did not differ among groups and was 74% in the DS group (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: The DELTA-HCC study shows that DS does not negatively impact either pre- nor post-LT patient outcomes, and has the potential to allow for redistribution of organs to patients in more urgent need of LT. It can reasonably be proposed and pursued. The unexpectedly high risk of dropout in T1 patients seems related to the MELD-based offering rules underserving this subgroup. IMPACTS AND IMPLICATIONS: To maximize utility and prevent premature liver transplantation (LT), a delayed LT strategy was adopted in France in 2015. It involves postponing LT until recurrence in patients listed for any single HCC curatively treated by surgical resection or thermal ablation. The DELTA-HCC study was conducted to evaluate this nationwide strategy. It shows in a European LT program that delayed strategy does not negatively impact pre- nor post-LT patient outcomes and is relevant to up to 20% of LT candidates; thus, it could potentially enable the redistribution of organs to patients in more urgent need of LT. Such a delayed strategy can reasonably be pursued and extended to other LT programs. Of note, an unexpectedly high risk of dropout in T1 patients, seemingly related to MELD-based offering rules which underserve these patients, calls for further scrutinization and revision of allocation rules in this subgroup.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Transplante de Fígado , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Transplante de Fígado/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , França/epidemiologia , Idoso , Listas de Espera/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, age at liver transplantation (LT) has markedly increased. In the context of organ shortage, we investigated the impact of recipient age on post-transplantation mortality. METHODS: All adult patients who received a first LT between 2007 and 2017 were included in this cross-sectional study. Recipients' characteristics at the time of listing, donor and surgery data, post-operative complications and follow-up of vital status were retrieved from the national transplantation database. The impact of age on 5-year overall mortality post-LT was estimated using a flexible multivariable parametric model which was also used to estimate the association between age and 10-year net survival, accounting for expected age- and sex-related mortality. RESULTS: Among the 7610 patients, 21.4% were aged 60-65 years, and 15.7% over 65. With increasing age, comorbidities increased but severity of liver disease decreased. Older recipient age was associated with decreased observed survival at 5 years after LT (p < .001), with a significant effect particularly during the first 2 years. The linear increase in the risk of death associated with age does not allow any definition of an age's threshold for LT (p = .832). Other covariates associated with an increased risk of 5-year death were dialysis and mechanical ventilation at transplant, transfusion during LT, hepatocellular carcinoma and donor age. Ten-year flexible net survival analysis confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: Although there was a selection process for older recipients, increasing age at LT was associated with an increased risk of death, particularly in the first years after LT.
Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Idoso , Fatores Etários , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida , Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Doença Hepática Terminal/mortalidade , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Due to its intrinsic complexity and the principle of collective solidarity that governs it, solid organ transplantation (SOT) seems to have been spared from the increase in litigation related to medical activity. Litigation relating to solid organ transplantation that took place in the 29 units of the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and was the subject of a judicial decision between 2015 and 2022 was studied. A total of 52 cases of SOT were recorded, all in adults, representing 1.1% of all cases and increasing from 0.71% to 1.5% over 7 years. The organs transplanted were 25 kidneys (48%), 19 livers (37%), 5 hearts (9%) and 3 lungs (6%). For kidney transplants, 11 complaints (44%) were related to living donor procedures and 6 to donors. The main causes of complaints were early post-operative complications in 31 cases (60%) and late complications in 13 cases (25%). The verdicts were in favour of the institution in 41 cases (79%). Solid organ transplants are increasingly the subject of litigation. Although the medical institution was not held liable in almost 80% of cases, this study makes a strong case for patients, living donors and their relatives to be better informed about SOT.
Assuntos
Hospitais Universitários , Transplante de Órgãos , Humanos , Transplante de Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais Universitários/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Doadores Vivos/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Fígado/legislação & jurisprudência , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/legislação & jurisprudência , Europa (Continente) , Transplante de Pulmão/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study examined 1071 adult primary kidney transplants from the French-controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCD) program, which uses normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), and involves short cold ischemia times (CIT) and constrained asystole times differing by donor age. METHODS: Logistic regression identified risk factors for primary nonfunction (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), and graft failure. RESULTS: Risk factors for PNF included donor hypertension, admission for ischemic vascular stroke, and HLA DR mismatches. Risk factors for DGF included functional warm ischemia time >40 min, dialysis >2 y, recipient body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher, recipient diabetes, and CIT >10 h. Risk factors for 1-y graft failure included donor hypertension, donor lung recovery, ostial calcification, recipient cardiovascular comorbidities, and HLA DR mismatches. A high donor estimated glomerular filtration rate protected against DGF and graft failure at 1-y. After adjustment restricted to recipient and graft factors and donor age, the risks of PNF, DGF, and graft failure increased with donor age up to 65 y and then remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that cDCD kidney transplants are highly successful, but also that its outcomes are influenced by lung recovery, poor HLA DR matching, and warm ischemia times differing with donor age. Our study identified several risk factors for kidney transplantation failure after cDCD with systematic use of NRP and some of them seem as modifiable variables associated with cDCD transplant outcome.
RESUMO
Background: About 10-20% of pancreas allografts are still lost in the early postoperative period despite the identification of numerous detrimental risk factors that correlate with graft thrombosis. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study including 899 pancreas transplant recipients between 2000 and 2018. Early pancreas failure due to complete thrombosis, long-term pancreas, kidney and patient survivals were analyzed and adjusted to donor, recipient and perioperative variables using a multivariate cause-specific Cox model stratified to transplant centers. Results: Pancreas from donors with history of hypertension (6.7%), as well as with high body mass index (BMI), were independently associated with an increased risk of pancreas failure within the first 30 post-operative days (respectively, HR= 2.57, 95% CI from 1.35 to 4.89 and HR= 1.11, 95% CI from 1.04 to 1.19). Interaction term between hypertension and BMI was negative. Donor hypertension also impacted long-term pancreas survival (HR= 1.88, 95% CI from 1.13 to 3.12). However, when pancreas survival was calculated after the postoperative day 30, donor hypertension was no longer a significant risk factor (HR= 1.22, 95% CI from 0.47 to 3.15). A lower pancreas survival was observed in patients receiving a pancreas from a hypertensive donor without RAAS (Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System) blockers compared to others (50% vs 14%, p < 0.001). Pancreas survival was similar among non-hypertensive donors and hypertensive ones under RAAS blockers. Conclusion: Donor hypertension was a significant and independent risk factor of pancreas failure. The well-known pathogenic role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system seems to be involved in the genesis of this immediate graft failure.
Assuntos
Angiotensina II , Hipertensão , Transplante de Pâncreas , Trombose , Doadores de Tecidos , Humanos , Transplante de Pâncreas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Hipertensão/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Trombose/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Aloenxertos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologiaRESUMO
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION IN France. The number of transplants has been rising for ten years. Nevertheless, the stabilization of the number of brain-dead people identified as potential organ donors, and the persistently high rate of opposition to organ removal, accentuate the substantial gap between the number of candidates for transplantation and the number of transplants performed each year. Strategies are being used to reduce this imbalance, such as broadening the brain-dead donors selection criteria and increasing procurement from living donors and deceased donors after circulatory death. Unfortunately, the Covid-19 pandemic has further aggravated the difference between the supply of transplants and the need.
ÉPIDÉMIOLOGIE DE LA TRANSPLANTATION D'ORGANES EN France. Le nombre de greffes augmente depuis dix ans. Néanmoins, la stabilisation du nombre de personnes en état de mort encéphalique identifiées comme donneurs d'organes potentiels et le taux d'opposition au prélèvement d'organes qui reste élevé accentuent l'écart conséquent existant entre les candidats à une greffe et le nombre de greffes réalisées chaque année. L'élargissement des critères de sélection des donneurs en état de mort encéphalique et l'augmentation du prélèvement chez des donneurs vivants, ou décédés après arrêt circulatoire, sont autant de stratégies mises en place pour réduire le déséquilibre entre l'offre de greffes et les besoins, déséquilibre encore majoré par la pandémie de Covid-19.