The Arabic Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8 (ASES-8): a valid and reliable measure of evaluating self-efficacy in Palestinian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale-8 (ASES-8) is one of the most commonly used scales to measure patient-reported arthritis-specific self-efficacy. However, evidence about the validity and reliability of ASES-8 in an Arabic-speaking arthritis population is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and assess aspects of validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the ASES-8. METHODS: The ASES-8 was translated into the Arabic language using the back-translation method, and administered to 67 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Construct validation methods used exploratory factor analysis and correlating the ASES-8 scores with disease-related variables expected to be related to the arthritis self-efficacy construct. An internal consistency test was conducted. Floor and ceiling effects were considered present if more than 15% of patients achieved high (=10) and low (=1) scores on the Arabic ASES-8 for both the scale and item scores. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor solution (factor loadings: 0.54-0.81). ASES-8 scores were correlated with all measures assessed (r = -0.24 to -0.57 and r = 0.06-0.66), demonstrating construct validity. Internal consistency was acceptable for measures of Cronbach's alpha (0.86-0.88). The scale did not exhibit ceiling or floor effects. CONCLUSIONS: The Arabic version of ASES-8 is valid and reliable for evaluating self-efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Implications for rehabilitationThe Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES-8) questionnaire was translated and adapted for use in Arabic language.This questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating self-efficacy among Arabic individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.This will support greater use of this tool worldwide in clinical and research practices that include Arabic people.

Factors Associated With Hand and Upper Arm Functional Disability in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: This original systematic review aimed to summarize evidence within observational studies on the factors associated with hand functional disability in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A rigorous extensive systematic literature search was conducted in 6 medical databases for peer-reviewed English language observational studies that explore the factors associated with hand function for people with RA. Factors were critically classified under the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework and health-related factors. The methodologic quality was determined using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. Factors related to hand function that were investigated in ≥2 studies were explored using a best-evidence synthesis. RESULTS: Twenty articles from 1,271 citations met the inclusion criteria. All presented cross-sectional data (5 high-quality and 15 low-quality articles), resulting in limited evidence in the best-evidence synthesis. For the factors classified under the ICF domains, the best-evidence synthesis indicated that a diverse range of positive and negative factors were associated with hand function. However, key factors were hand strength, disease activity, and pain intensity. It is evident that few sociodemographic factors have been explored for the association with hand function. CONCLUSION: Although the level of evidence was limited, modifiable factors such as grip strength, disease activity, and pain were identified as the most influential factors on hand function in people with RA. The findings of the present review indicate that important sociodemographic factors that impact hand function in individuals with RA have not yet been considered or reported in clinical research.