SPINE20 recommendations 2022: spine care-working together to recover stronger.

PURPOSE: Globally, spine disorders are the leading cause of disability, affecting more than half a billion individuals. However, less than 50% of G20 countries specifically identify spine health within their public policy priorities. Therefore, it is crucial to raise awareness among policy makers of the disabling effect of spine disorders and their impact on the economic welfare of G20 nations. In 2019, SPINE20 was established as the leading advocacy group to bring global attention to spine disorders. METHODS: Recommendations were developed through two Delphi methods with international and multi-professional panels. RESULTS: In 2022, seven recommendations were delivered to the leaders of G20 countries, urging them to: Develop action plans to provide universal access to evidence-based spine care that incorporates the needs of minorities and vulnerable populations. Invest in the development of sustainable human resource capacity, through multisectoral and inter-professional competency-based education and training to promote evidence-based approaches to spine care, and to build an appropriate healthcare working environment that optimizes the delivery of safe health services. Develop policies using the best available evidence to properly manage spine disorders and to prolong functional healthy life expectancy in the era of an aging population. Create a competent workforce and improve the healthcare infrastructure/facilities including equipment to provide evidence-based inter-professional rehabilitation services to patients with spinal cord injury throughout their continuum of care. Build collaborative and innovative translational research capacity within national, regional, and global healthcare systems for state-of-the-art and cost-effective spine care across the healthcare continuum ensuring equality, diversity, and inclusion of all stakeholders. Develop international consensus statements on patient outcomes and how they can be used to define and develop pathways for value-based care. Recognize that intervening on determinants of health including physical activity, nutrition, physical and psychosocial workplace environment, and smoking-free lifestyle can reduce the burden of spine disabilities and improve the health status and wellness of the population. At the third SPINE20 summit 2022 which took place in Bali, Indonesia, in August 2022, 17 associations endorsed its recommendations. CONCLUSION: SPINE20 advocacy efforts focus on developing public policy recommendations to improve the health, welfare, and wellness of all who suffer from spinal pain and disability. We propose that focusing on facilitating access to systems that prioritize value-based care delivered by a competent healthcare workforce will reduce disability and improve the productivity of the G20 nations.

SPINE20 recommendations 2021: spine care for people's health and prosperity.

PURPOSE: The focus of SPINE20 is to develop evidence-based policy recommendations for the G20 countries to work with governments to reduce the burden of spine disease, and disability. METHODS: On September 17-18, 2021, SPINE20 held its annual meeting in Rome, Italy. Prior to the meeting, the SPINE20 created six proposed recommendations. These recommendations were uploaded to the SPINE20 website 10 days before the meeting and opened to the public for comments. The recommendations were discussed at the meeting allowing the participants to object and provide comments. RESULTS: In total, 27 societies endorsed the following recommendations. SPINE20 calls upon the G20 countries: (1) to expand telehealth for the access to spine care, especially in light of the current situation with COVID-19. (2) To adopt value-based interprofessional spine care as an approach to improve patient outcomes and reduce disability. (3) To facilitate access and invest in the development of a competent rehabilitation workforce to reduce the burden of disability related to spine disorders. (4) To adopt a strategy to promote daily physical activity and exercises among the elderly population to maintain an active and independent life with a healthy spine, particularly after COVID-19 pandemic. (5) To engage in capacity building with emerging countries and underserved communities for the benefit of spine patients. (6) To promote strategies to transfer evidence-based advances into patient benefit through effective implementation processes. CONCLUSIONS: SPINE20's initiatives will make governments and decision makers aware of efforts to reduce needless suffering from disabling spine pain through education that can be instituted across the globe.

SPINE20 Recommendations 2024 -Spinal Disability: Social Inclusion as a Key to Prevention and Management.

Spine disorders are the leading cause of disability worldwide. To promote social inclusion, it is essential to ensure that people can participate in their societies by improving their ability, opportunities, and dignity, through access to high-quality, evidence-based, and affordable spine services for all.To achieve this goal, SPINE20 recommends six actions.- SPINE20 recommends that G20 countries deliver evidence-based education to the community health workers and primary care clinicians to promote best practice for spine health, especially in underserved communities.- SPINE20 recommends that G20 countries deliver evidence-based, high-quality, cost-effective spine care interventions that are accessible, affordable and beneficial to patients.- SPINE20 recommends that G20 countries invest in Health Policy and System Research (HPSR) to generate evidence to develop and implement policies aimed at integrating rehabilitation in primary care to improve spine health.- SPINE20 recommends that G20 countries support ongoing research initiatives on digital technologies including artificial intelligence, regulate digital technologies, and promote evidence-based, ethical digital solutions in all aspects of spine care, to enrich patient care with high value and quality.- SPINE20 recommends that G20 countries prioritize social inclusion by promoting equitable access to comprehensive spine care through collaborations with healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations.- SPINE20 recommends that G20 countries prioritize spine health to improve the well-being and productivity of their populations. Government health systems are expected to create a healthier, more productive, and equitable society for all through collaborative efforts and sustained investment in evidence-based care and promotion of spine health.

SPINE20 recommendations 2023: One Earth, one family, one future WITHOUT spine DISABILITY.

Introduction: The purpose is to report on the fourth set of recommendations developed by SPINE20 to advocate for evidence-based spine care globally under the theme of "One Earth, One Family, One Future WITHOUT Spine DISABILITY". Research question: Not applicable. Material and methods: Recommendations were developed and refined through two modified Delphi processes with international, multi-professional panels. Results: Seven recommendations were delivered to the G20 countries calling them to:-establish, prioritize and implement accessible National Spine Care Programs to improve spine care and health outcomes.-eliminate structural barriers to accessing timely rehabilitation for spinal disorders to reduce poverty.-implement cost-effective, evidence-based practice for digital transformation in spine care, to deliver self-management and prevention, evaluate practice and measure outcomes.-monitor and reduce safety lapses in primary care including missed diagnoses of serious spine pathologies and risk factors for spinal disability and chronicity.-develop, implement and evaluate standardization processes for spine care delivery systems tailored to individual and population health needs.-ensure accessible and affordable quality care to persons with spine disorders, injuries and related disabilities throughout the lifespan.-promote and facilitate healthy lifestyle choices (including physical activity, nutrition, smoking cessation) to improve spine wellness and health. Discussion and conclusion: SPINE20 proposes that focusing on the recommendations would facilitate equitable access to health systems, affordable spine care delivered by a competent healthcare workforce, and education of persons with spine disorders, which will contribute to reducing spine disability, associated poverty, and increase productivity of the G20 nations.

Postural control deficit in acute QTF grade II whiplash injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental in vivo study. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the balance control in patients with acute QTF grade II whiplash injuries of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Tetra-ataxiametric posturography in chronic pain patients after whiplash injuries of the cervical spine has revealed an impaired regulation of balance. However, so far it is unclear if this is caused by the accident or other factors that are associated with the pain chronification process. METHODS: 40 patients with acute QTF grade II whiplash injuries and 40 healthy matched controls were examined on a posturography platform. The stability index ST(Sigma) and the Fourier analysis FA(Sigma) (0.10-1.00Hz) were established for eight standing positions and sum scores were calculated. The pain index was established using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 100. A follow-up examination was conducted for the patients after 2 months. RESULTS: The patients with acute whiplash injuries of the cervical spine achieved significantly poorer results for both ST(Sigma) and FA(Sigma) than the healthy controls. There were no differences between the eight standing positions for both ST(Sigma) and FA(Sigma). After 2 months, 17 patients had no change in the pain development, 21 patients showed an improvement in pain intensity and 2 patients had deteriorated. The subgroup of patients with improvement in pain intensity showed a significant improvement in balance control concerning the FA(Sigma) compared to patients with unchanged pain intensity. CONCLUSION: Patients with acute whiplash injuries have a reduced balance control as compared to matched controls. This study gives an indication that post-traumatic neck pain is associated with impairments of postural control.

Influence of anthropometry on the kinematics of the cervical spine and the risk of injury in sled tests in female volunteers.

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of anthropometric data on the kinematics of the cervical spine and the risk factors for sustaining a neck injury during rear-end collisions occurring in a sled test. A rear-end collision with a velocity change (DeltaV) of 6.3 km/h was simulated in a sled test with eight healthy female subjects. The study analysed the association of anthropometric data with the initial distance between the head and the head restraint, defined kinematic characteristics, the neck injury criterion (NIC) and the neck injury criterion minor (NICmin). The head circumference is negatively associated (r=-0.598) with the initial distance between the head and the head restraint, the maximal head extension (r=-0.687) and the maximal dorsal angular head acceleration (r=-0.633). The body weight (r=0.800), body height (r=0.949) and thorax circumference (r=0.632) are positively associated with the maximal ventral head translation. The neck length correlates positively with the NIC (r=0.826) and negatively with the NICmin (r=-0.797). Anthropometric factors influence the kinematics of the cervical spine and the risk of injury. A high risk of injury may be assumed for individuals with a small head circumference, long neck, tall body height and high body weight.

Injuries of the cervical spine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: experience at two trauma centers.

OBJECT: The cervical spine in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (Bechterew disease) is exposed to maximal risk due to physical load. Even minor trauma can cause fractures because of the spine's poor elasticity (so-called bamboo spine). The authors conducted a study to determine the characteristics of cervical fractures in patients with AS to describe the standard procedures in the treatment of this condition at two trauma centers and to discuss complications of and outcomes after treatment. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2006, 37 patients were surgically treated at two institutions. All patients were examined preoperatively and when being discharged from the hospital for rehabilitation. Single-session (11 cases) and two-session anterior-posterior (13 cases), anterior (11 cases), posterior (two cases), and laminectomy (one case) procedures were performed. The injury pattern, segments involved, the pre- and postoperative neurological status, and complications were analyzed. Preoperative neurological deficits were present in 36 patients. All patients experienced improvement postoperatively, and there was no case of surgery-related neurological deterioration. In patients in whom treatment was delayed because of late diagnosis, preoperative neurological deficits were more severe and improvement worse than those treated earlier. The causes of three deaths were respiratory distress syndrome due to a rigid thorax and cerebral ischemia due to rupture of the vertebral arteries. There were 12 perioperative complications (32%), three infections, one deep venous thrombosis, five early implant failures, and the three aforementioned fatalities. There were no cases of epidural hematoma. In all five cases in which early implant failure required revision surgery, the initial stabilization procedure had been anterior only. A comparison of complications and the outcomes at the two centers revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The standard intervention for these injuries is open reduction, anterior decompression and fusion, and anterior-posterior stabilization; these procedures may be conducted in one or two stages. Based on the early implant failures that occurred exclusively after single-session anterior stabilizations (five of 10--a failure rate of 50%), the authors have performed only posterior and anterior procedures since 1997 at both centers. Diagnostic investigations include computed tomography scanning or magnetic resonance imaging of the whole spine, because additional injuries are common. The causative trauma may be very slight, and diagnosis may be delayed because plain radiographs can be initially misinterpreted. In cases in which diagnosis is delayed, patients present with more severe neurological deficits, and postoperative improvement is less pronounced than that in patients in whom a prompt diagnosis is established. Because of postoperative pulmonary and ischemic complications, the mortality rate is high. In the present series the mortality rate was lower than the mean rate reported in the literature.

The traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. A biomechanical in vitro evaluation of an instability model and clinical relevant constructs for stabilization.

OBJECTIVE: Stepwise destabilization of the traumatic spondylolisthesis C2 with an increasing anterior defect of C2-C3 was investigated. The three-dimensional stabilizing capabilities of posterior transpedicle screw osteosynthesis and two anterior plate systems C2-C3, the H-plate and the titanium locking plate were tested. DESIGN: A biomechanical in vitro study was performed using a standardized experimental protocol in a spine tester. BACKGROUND: The extent of the instability of the traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2 within its different types remains unclear. Posterior and anterior approaches for stabilization exist for patients with isthmusfractures at C2, the stabilizing effect has not been demonstrated yet. METHODS: The motion levels from C2-C3 in six human specimen were tested in flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending and left and right axial rotation. The specimens were tested intact, after destabilization and after stabilization. RESULTS: In extension and axial rotation, each step of destabilization decreased the moment significantly, to achieve the range of motion of the intact specimen. In flexion a statistical significant destabilization after separation of the posterior longitudinal ligament was present. The flexibility tests showed an increasing range of motion of the posterior transpedicle screws, with increasing anterior instability markedly in flexion and extension. After H-plate and locking plate fixation, a significant decrease of the range of motion resulted in flexion. The stiffness in flexion and extension increased consecutively, while in lateral bending and axial rotation the transpedicle screw fixation showed the highest stiffness. CONCLUSIONS/RELEVANCE: The traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2 is a significantly unstable injury in case of additional segmental damage of C2-C3. Anterior stabilization in these injuries is mandatory.

Qualitative and quantitative accuracy of CAOS in a standardized in vitro spine model.

Pedicle breach with screw implantation is relatively common. For clinical application of computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery, it is important to quantitatively know the accuracy and localization of any guidance modality. We ascertained the accuracy of computed tomography and C-arm-based navigated drilling versus conventional fluoroscopy using an artificial thoracic and lumbar spine model. The 3.2-mm diameter transpedicle drilling target was the center of a 4-mm steel ball fixed in the anterior left pedicle axis. After drilling, we used computed tomography to verify the position of the steel ball and the canal and visually explored for cortex perforation. Quantitative vector calculation showed computed tomography-based navigation had the greatest accuracy (median, d(thoracic) = 1.4 mm; median, d(lumbar) = 1.8 mm) followed by C-arm navigation (median, d(thoracic) = 2.6 mm; median, d(lumbar) = 2 mm) and the conventional procedure (median, d(thoracic) = 2.2 mm; median, d(lumbar) = 2.7 mm). Visual examination showed a decreased perforation rate in navigated drillings. We found no correlation between pedicle breaches and inaccurate drilling. The data suggest computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery cannot provide sub-millimeter accuracy, and complete prevention of pedicle perforation is not realistic.

Does computer-assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses?

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. OBJECTIVE: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) means improved accuracy in inserting screws. Usually the required time of the intraoperative use of a C-arm device is reduced. The aim of the study was to quantify the radiation doses during spine surgery in different types of computer-assisted surgical procedures (i.e., computerized tomography [CT] based and C-arm) compared to standard methods and, as a new technique, the Iso-C3D C-arm (Siemens, GER). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A total of 38 individuals were enrolled in the study, including 8 who underwent standard spine surgery, 10 with CT-based, 9 with C-arm based, and 11 with Iso-C3D C-arm based. The thermoluminescence dosimetry measurements were 2 at the radiation source, 2 at the patient, and 2 at the receiver. METHODS: This study is based on the thermoluminescence method. A total of 38 individuals were enrolled in the study. Despite the small number of patients, the existing results up until now showed a clear reduction of the duration of radiation time using CAS compared to standard methods in spine surgery. Much more important is the fact that the radiation doses were clearly reduced from a median of 1091 mGy using the standard procedure versus 432 mGy in CT-based and 664 mGy in C-arm based guided surgery. The Iso-C3D C-arm showed a median of 152 mGy. RESULTS: The duration of radiation was reduced from 177 seconds in the standard spine procedure to 75 seconds in CT-based CAS spine intervention. Comparing the different types of CAS application at the spine, the Iso-C3D C-arm based surgery is the method with the lowest duration of radiation. The radiation doses at the C-arm tube (source) are reduced from a median of 1091 mGy in the standard procedure versus 432 mGy in CT-based and 664 mGy in C-arm based guided surgery. In this study, the median dose of an Iso-C3D C-arm was 152 mGy. CONCLUSION: These findings are important for the operating room personnel, which is exposed daily to radiation intraoperatively, as well as the patients, when using CAS procedures.

Regulation of gene expression in intervertebral disc cells by low and high hydrostatic pressure.

Intervertebral disc structures are exposed to wide ranges of intradiscal hydrostatic pressure during different loading exercises and are at their minimum during lying or relaxed sitting and at maximum during lifting weights with a round back. We hypothesize that these different loading magnitudes influence the intervertebral disc (IVD) by alteration of disc matrix turnover depending on their magnitudes. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess changes in gene expression of human nucleus cells after the application of low hydrostatic pressure (0.25 MPa) and high hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa). IVD cells isolated from the nucleus of human (n = 18) and bovine (n = 24 from four animals) disc biopsies were seeded into three-dimensional collagen type-I matrices and exposed to the different loading magnitudes by specially developed pressure chambers. The lower pressure range (0.25 MPa, 30 min, 0.1 Hz) was applied with a recently published device by using an external compression cylinder. For the application of higher loads (2.5 MPa, 30 min, 0.1 Hz) the cell-loaded collagen gels were sealed into sterile bags with culture medium and stimulated in a newly developed water-filled compression cylinder by using a loading frame. These methods allowed the comparison of loading regimes in a wide physiological range under an equal three-dimensional culture conditions. Cells were harvested 24 h after the end of stimulation and changes in the expression of genes known to influence IVD matrix turnover (collagen-I, collagen-II, aggrecan, MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP13) were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test(1) and a Wilcoxon 2-sample test(2) were performed to detect differences between the stimulated and control samples(1) and differences between low and high hydrostatic pressure(2). Multiple testing was considered by adjusting the p value appropriately. Both regimes of hydrostatic pressure influenced gene expression in nucleus cells with opposite tendencies for the matrix forming proteins aggrecan and collagen type-I in response to the two different pressure magnitudes: Low hydrostatic-pressure (0.25 MPa) tended to increase collagen-I and aggrecan expression of human nucleus cells (P < 0.05) but only to a small degree. High hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa) tended to decrease gene expression of all anabolic proteins with significant effects on aggrecan expression of nucleus cells (P = 0.004). Low hydrostatic pressure had no influence on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1, MMP2, MMP3 and MMP13). In contrast, high hydrostatic pressure tended to increase the expression of MMP1, MMP3 and MMP13 of human nucleus cells with high individual-individual variations. The decreased expression of aggrecan (P = 0.008) and collagen type II (P = 0.023) and the increased MMP3 expression (P = 0.008) in response to high hydrostatic pressure could be confirmed in additional experiments with bovine nucleus cells. These results suggest that hydrostatic pressure as one of the physiological stimuli of the IVD may influence matrix turnover in a magnitude dependent way. Low hydrostatic pressure (0.25 MPa) has quite small influences with a tendency to anabolic effects, whereas high hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa) tends to decrease the matrix protein expression with a tendency to increase some matrix-turnover enzymes. Therefore, hydrostatic pressure may regulate disc matrix turnover in a dose-dependent way.

Solvent-preserved, bovine cancellous bone blocks used for reconstruction of thoracolumbar fractures in minimally invasive spinal surgery-first clinical results.

We investigated the osseointegration of solvent-preserved, xenogenous cancellous bone blocks in the treatment of unstable fractures of the thoracolumbar junction. In 22 patients, the anterior repair procedure was performed by thoracoscopy or minimally invasive retroperitoneal surgery. Twenty-two patients had undergone monosegmental anterior fusion and were surveyed prospectively. Solvent-preserved, bovine cancellous bone blocks were used in 11 patients; iliac crest bone graft was used in the others. Follow-up after 12 months included CT scans, which revealed successful osseointegration in eight out of 11 patients who had received autogenous iliac crest bone grafts, while three patients showed a partial integration. There were no graft fragmentations. In patients who had received solvent-preserved, xenogenous cancellous bone blocks, complete osseointegration was achieved at the graft-bone interface in only two out of 11 cases, after 1 year. Partial integration was found in three patients. In view of these results, autogenous iliac crest bone grafts are still the unrivalled standard for defect repair in spinal surgery.

Computer-guidance in percutaneous screw stabilization of the iliosacral joint.

Nine patients with instability and one patient with degeneration of the iliosacral joint were treated surgically. The posterior pelvic ring was stabilized with the assistance of an optoelectronic navigation system. Registration was ensured by using fiducial screws in the iliac crest or by collecting landmarks on the external fixator. Computed tomography scans taken postoperatively provided additional information regarding implant localization in all patients. Accurate placement of 21 of 22 implanted iliosacral screws was observed. Two of the 21 screws touched the wall of the second sacral foramen without perforating the canal. One screw perforated the anterior wall of the sacrum because the navigated guide wire was bent during implantation. The initial results indicate that computer-aided frameless navigation in surgery of the iliosacral joint can facilitate surgical performance during screw stabilization in selected patients. Two important issues must be considered in the clinical application of this technique: first, any relative migration of the iliac and sacral bone structures between computed tomography scans taken preoperatively and intraoperative navigation may result in an intolerable inaccuracy of computer guidance. Second, bending of the guide wire of the tracked power drive, which cannot be accommodated by the navigation system, will lead to misguidance; therefore, only navigated drill sleeves should be used.

Spinal navigation in tumor surgery of the thoracic spine: first clinical results.

In this clinical study, the accuracy of computed tomography-based and computer-guided decompression and insertion of pedicle screws in patients who have had tumor-related posterior surgery of the thoracic spine was evaluated. Eight patients with advanced metastatic disease were treated surgically using a posterior approach with the assistance of an optoelectronic navigation system. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained for all patients and provided information regarding decompression and transpedicle implant localization. In all eight patients accurate decompression of the spinal canal was seen. Using the navigation system, 22 of 26 scheduled transpedicle screws were inserted using computer guidance. Eighty-six percent (19 of 22) of the navigated pedicle screws were positioned centrally in the bone. Initial results indicate that computer-aided frameless navigation in tumor surgery of the thoracic spine is a safe system to improve surgical performance during posterior decompression and transpedicle stabilization. Although computed tomography-based computer-assisted spinal navigation is important, the system is not 100% accurate. Therefore, application of the navigation system should be restricted to experienced surgeons who can continue the operation using a conventional approach. Finally, detailed knowledge of the principles of the tracking systems is necessary to prevent possible misinterpretation of information provided by the computer.

Navigation at the spine.

Computer aided and computer navigated operative techniques have been used for the first time in neurosurgery and surgery of the spine. For computer aided surgery of the spine there are currently two different methods: CT-based and C-arm based techniques. The advantage of the CT-based technique is its accuracy especially in difficult anatomical regions like the cervical and upper thoracic spine, and the possibility of preoperative planning. The advantage of C-arm navigation is the broad intraoperative availability with the disadvantage of limited image quality in some regions of the spine eg, the upper thoracic spine. This last disadvantage has been dramatically improved by introducing 3-D C-arm navigation (ISO C 3-D, Siemens, GER). Generally, all methods enhance the precision of pedicle screw insertion. Clinical as well as experimental studies show an exact pedicle screw position using the computer navigated techniques in over 90% of cases. C-arm based navigational techniques are being constantly improved and the future will be CT-like images with instant intraoperative availability.